Hi all,
As our organization has matured, we've discovered the joy of speaking the
same carrier ethernet languages as our vendors and as such we're going
through a process of aligning our service-offerings with MEF-centric
terminology.
Anyone out there taken any MEF-certification training programs
Hello,
I have a very strange problem on my ASR-1006 BRAS router.
This router is having two equal paths toward a P router via IS-IS. The BRAS is
seeing the P router over the two paths and the two paths are installed in the
RIB and FIB as follows:
bng.rams.ca.asr1#sh ip cef 10.10.10.141 intern
- Original Message -
> From: "Owen Roth via Outages"
> Is anyone else being impacted or have more information about a Verizon
> fiber ring repair in LA that went south yesterday afternoon? A
> client's fiber is STILL down more than 16 hours later, and the only
> information I have is that
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 02:20:45PM +0300, Tarko Tikan wrote:
> 2000::/6 with aspath 3257 3549 has appeared in global routing table. Surely
> we can't be only ones seeing it. Looks like someone messed up
> interface/route config at 3549 by omitting 4 from the prefixlen.
>
> According to https://sta
Hi,
::/24 is also present: AS-PATH 8455 13030 9498 7602
Mailed the tech-c 2 weeks ago, no response so far.
On 10 September 2014 14:33, Alain Hebert wrote:
> As of 8h30m EST.
>
> *>i 2000::/6 1001000 3257 3549 i
>Last update to IP routing table: 21h2
As of 8h30m EST.
*>i 2000::/6 1001000 3257 3549 i
Last update to IP routing table: 21h23m56s
-
Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G
hey,
2000::/6 with aspath 3257 3549 has appeared in global routing table.
Surely we can't be only ones seeing it. Looks like someone messed up
interface/route config at 3549 by omitting 4 from the prefixlen.
According to https://stat.ripe.net/2000%3A%3A%2F6#tabId=routing
"2000::/6 is visible
7 matches
Mail list logo
