+1, blanket banning is probably not the best way to go.
On 6/28/2014 午前 05:40, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014, Adam Greene wrote:
We're evaluating whether to add BGP feeds from these two sources in
attempt
to minimize exposure to DoS.
The Team Cymru BOGON list (
http://www.team-cymru.
On 6/27/2014 4:42 AM, Toney Mareo wrote:
Fascinating.
--
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
of System Administrators:
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to
BGP Update Report
Interval: 19-Jun-14 -to- 26-Jun-14 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS26615 106096 3.8% 122.7 -- Tim Celular S.A.,BR
2 - AS982986844 3.1% 6
This report has been generated at Fri Jun 27 21:13:58 2014 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
>> We're a little more leery about trying Spamhaus's BGPf service (DROP,
>> EDROP
>> and BCL,
>>
>> http://www.spamhaus.org/bgpf/
>
>
> This is more about stopping spam from entering your network and stopping
> compromised hosts on your network f
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014, Adam Greene wrote:
We're evaluating whether to add BGP feeds from these two sources in attempt
to minimize exposure to DoS.
The Team Cymru BOGON list (
http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/bogon-bn-nonagg.txt or
http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/bogon-bn-agg.
Appreciate the Clarification Darden, I wasn't aware Spamhaus had this other
division / service, time for some reading.
-Original Message-
From: Darden, Patrick [mailto:patrick.dar...@p66.com]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 11:50 AM
To: SysIT; Adam Greene; 'NANOG list'
Subject: RE: Team Cymr
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.ap
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Toney Mareo wrote:
> >
Hi Toney,
I think something must have gone wrong
with your email; all the fine advice you
had intended to pass along didn't seem
to make it through intact; all we got was
an empty message body, and no advice.
Thanks!
Matt
That wont stop a DoS.
A DoS or DDoS is pure bandwidth wars for the most part, if someone is to DoS
you, they already have your IP's and urls they need to attack you, thus a spam
list won't stop an attack.
If you want to minimize actual spam, sure.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto
On 06/26/2014 10:14 PM, Collin Anderson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:00 PM, John Levine wrote:
I've been looking for the case in PACER, and don't see
anything filed this year against ICANN so the case doesn't even exist.
Seth Charles Ben HAIM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The ISLAMIC REPUBLIC
John Levine wrote:
>
> The US has a long policy of not messing with ccTLDs, even of countries
> that we don't like such as .kp, .cu, and .iq (back in the day).
The latter had a fairly messy history:
http://www.iana.org/reports/2005/iq-report-05aug2005.pdf
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Could I also encourage you to do anti-spoofing filtering, a la BCP38?
- - ferg
On 6/27/2014 8:17 AM, Adam Greene wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> We're evaluating whether to add BGP feeds from these two sources in
> attempt to minimize exposure to DoS.
Hi all,
We're evaluating whether to add BGP feeds from these two sources in attempt
to minimize exposure to DoS.
The Team Cymru BOGON list (
http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/bogon-bn-nonagg.txt or
http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/bogon-bn-agg.txt
)
looks promising and
>> Yes. ccTLDs are treated as national sovereign resources.
>
>By whom and where?
>
>Regardless, there are 'State Sponsors of Terrorism'-related amendments to
>the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act that come into play here.
The US has a long policy of not messing with ccTLDs, even of countries
that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 6/27/2014 7:49 AM, Collin Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:50 AM, David Conrad
> wrote:
>
>> Yes. ccTLDs are treated as national sovereign resources.
>>
>
> By whom and where?
>
> Regardless, there are 'State Sponsors of Terrorism
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:50 AM, David Conrad wrote:
> Yes. ccTLDs are treated as national sovereign resources.
>
By whom and where?
Regardless, there are 'State Sponsors of Terrorism'-related amendments to
the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act that come into play here.
--
*Collin David Anderso
On Jun 27, 2014, at 5:35 AM, Joly MacFie wrote:
> But, are ccTLDs licenced by ICANN?
No.
Some ccTLD managers have signed "Affirmations of Commitments" with ICANN that
basically say both ICANN and the ccTLD admit each other exists, but it isn't
required.
> I thought they were independent.
Yes
On Jun 26, 2014, at 10:14 PM, Collin Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:00 PM, John Levine wrote:
>
>> I've been looking for the case in PACER, and don't see
>> anything filed this year against ICANN so the case doesn't even exist.
>>
>
> Seth Charles Ben HAIM, et al., Plaintiffs,
I was wondering: Would there be an interest in a similar IPsec SFP or is
that part already well taken care of by the router market?
Kind regards,
Pieter Hulshoff
21 matches
Mail list logo
