On 6/14/2014 2:27 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 6/13/14, 12:39, Roy wrote:
Does Charter Cable have IPV6 for businesses yet? If so can someone
point me in the right direction. Their NOC seems to be clueless on
their IPV6 plans
I have native IPv6 with BGP on Charter (AS20115) since January 2013
On 6/13/14, 12:39, Roy wrote:
Does Charter Cable have IPV6 for businesses yet? If so can someone
point me in the right direction. Their NOC seems to be clueless on
their IPV6 plans
I have native IPv6 with BGP on Charter (AS20115) since January 2013.
Coax is probably still "no".
~Seth
Thanks Shawn. That is more along the lines of what I expected to see.
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Shawn L wrote:
> It seems ok from here
>
> traceroute 8.8.8.8
> traceroute to 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
>
> 4 dtr02rhnlwi-bue-1.rhnl.wi.charter.com (96.34.16.250) 20.8
It seems ok from here
traceroute 8.8.8.8
traceroute to 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
4 dtr02rhnlwi-bue-1.rhnl.wi.charter.com (96.34.16.250) 20.843 ms 21.236
ms 21.616 ms
5 crr02euclwi-bue-7.eucl.wi.charter.com (96.34.17.32) 27.662 ms 36.047
ms 35.623 ms
6 bbr02euclwi
Hoping someone auditing the list can provide some insight or a back
channel support option.
I started having some good latency spikes last night, which have
continued this morning, so I finally took a look at things and I am
seeing a lot more routing than I expected. Support is telling me this
is
We just turned up another BGP IPV4 circuit with them the other day, when I
pressed for IPV6, I
was told "End of year we might have it ready for deployment".
Richard Strittmatter
rich...@mesh.net
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of David Hill
Sent
6 matches
Mail list logo