Yeah, I was just suggesting alternatives just incase. I have setup ICANN's axfr
servers :)
mehmet
On May 20, 2014, at 10:50 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> The last time I asked them, F-root had a "we allow it because it's the right
> thing to do but we don't like it" policy. Given that ICANN operat
The last time I asked them, F-root had a "we allow it because it's the
right thing to do but we don't like it" policy. Given that ICANN
operates an infrastructure purposely built for doing zone transfers, and
given that they offer more zones than are on the roots, that's the way I
recommend peo
F-root also allows you to axfr root-zone ( dig @f.root-servers.net . axfr )
On May 20, 2014, at 10:32 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> Signed PGP part
> On 05/20/2014 02:21 PM, Brandon Applegate wrote:
> | Is anyone using this and having failed login for a few days now ?
> I?ve been mirroring the root
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/20/2014 02:21 PM, Brandon Applegate wrote:
| Is anyone using this and having failed login for a few days now ?
I?ve been mirroring the root zone(s) for years and I just started
getting failures in my logs. I emailed an address I found on the
In article <537c1f17.6070...@digital-z.com> you write:
>On 5/20/14, 4:21 PM, Brandon Applegate wrote:
>> Is anyone using this and having failed login for a few days now ? I�ve been
>> mirroring the root
>zone(s) for years and I just started getting failures in my logs. I emailed
>an address I f
On 5/20/14, 4:21 PM, Brandon Applegate wrote:
> Is anyone using this and having failed login for a few days now ? I’ve been
> mirroring the root zone(s) for years and I just started getting failures in
> my logs. I emailed an address I found on the Verisign website but so far
> dead air. If a
Some output deleted to save spamminess:
}~/ ftp rz.verisign-grs.net
Connected to rz.verisign-grs.net.
220- Welcome to the VeriSign Global Registry Services gTLD Zone
FTP Server
Name (rz.verisign-grs.net:jamie): [myusername]
331 Please specify the password.
Password:
230 Login successful.
Deploy IPv6. This is the solution to this problem. Google supports
IPv6 on all their services AFAIK.
Mark
In message <537b64f7.5020...@edylie.net>, Pui Edylie writes:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> May I know what is the best approach so that Google would not ban our
> Natted IP from time to time as it
In article <904ce971-b779-4c9e-af8d-8dafcce01...@burn.net> you write:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Is anyone using this and having failed login for a few days now ? I�ve been
>mirroring the root
>zone(s) for years and I just started getting failures in my logs. I emailed
>an address I found on
>the Verisign
On May 20, 2014, at 5:32 PM, jamie <260...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have access; my last success was today at 12:27am est
>
> Wait; Do you have a userid or are you trying to log in anonymous? I'm pretty
> sure this is a closed system..
>
I have a username/pass. Got it by signing the agreement y
I have access; my last success was today at 12:27am est
Wait; Do you have a userid or are you trying to log in anonymous? I'm
pretty sure this is a closed system..
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Brandon Applegate wrote:
> Is anyone using this and having failed login for a few days now ? I’
On 20/05/2014 22:21, Brandon Applegate wrote:
> Is anyone using this and having failed login for a few days now ? I’ve
> been mirroring the root zone(s) for years and I just started getting
> failures in my logs.
ftp://rs.internic.net/domain/root.zone
Nick
Is anyone using this and having failed login for a few days now ? I’ve been
mirroring the root zone(s) for years and I just started getting failures in my
logs. I emailed an address I found on the Verisign website but so far dead
air. If anyone knows of a more pointed email POC that would act
>Some of the networks I work with do the "everything behind NAT" thing and
get bitten by this. Using a pool of addresses helps but... This is only
going to get more painful with more people doing >"Carrier Grade"
>NAT...
I Run CGN with tens of thousands of broadband users being translated behind
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:35:56AM -0400, Harald Koch wrote:
>
> Might help if all your hosts have their own IPv6 addresses
That was meant to be implied... But...
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:10:56AM -0600, Derek Andrew wrote:
> They take out our campus, both IPv4 and IPv6.
That's interesting, I
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:35:49PM -0400,
Brian Henson wrote
a message of 107 lines which said:
> Looks like it has been corrected now
Not from everywhere. From two different networks in France, I get:
% check-soa -i nipr.mil
CON1.nipr.mil.
199.252.157.234: ERROR: Timeout
CON2.nipr.
Looks like it has been corrected now
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
> Hi Clark
>
>
> It's down when looked upon from our DNS recursors in India as well.
>
>
> I have seen in past with many domains (not TLDs though) that when they are
> down due to non-reachability of aut
If at all possible, consider using a NAT pool instead of translating
all outbound web traffic to a single IP address. When I ran
Tribune's network (with about 15K internal client IPs), we were
blacklisted by Google several times due to high query volumes. In the
end I built a pair of /24 NAT poo
Their determination is based on the type of search traffic more than the
volume. I had some success using squid to proxy through to them and reduce the
overall number of complex queries.
On May 20, 2014, at 10:10 AM, Derek Andrew wrote:
> They take out our campus, both IPv4 and IPv6.
>
> Al
They take out our campus, both IPv4 and IPv6.
All hailing attempts fail.
Good luck.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Pui Edylie wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> May I know what is the best approach so that Google would not ban our
> Natted IP from time to time as it suspect it as a bot.
>
> Is the
On 20 May 2014 10:27, William Waites wrote:
> IPv6?
>
Might help if all your hosts have their own IPv6 addresses - doesn't help
if you run an http proxy. Google blacklists my (personal) IPv6 proxy at
least once a month.
--
Harald
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:21:43PM +0800, Pui Edylie wrote:
>
> May I know what is the best approach so that Google would not ban our
> Natted IP from time to time as it suspect it as a bot.
IPv6?
Hi Everyone,
May I know what is the best approach so that Google would not ban our
Natted IP from time to time as it suspect it as a bot.
Is there any official channel from Google which we could work with them
for resolution?
Thanks much!
Best,
Edy
http://www.lacnic.net/en/web/lacnic/inicio
Website is still showing phase 0 of address depletion, but the updated
quantity means that the /9 trigger has been reached.
Rubens
24 matches
Mail list logo
