On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 2:32 AM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
> So, if there's more than 4 billion ants... what are they going to do?
there will never be more than 4 billion ants.
> On 4/5/2014 1:44 AM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
>>
>>
>> Offered for your amusement--no followup.
>>
>> http://kottke.org/14/04/
So, if there's more than 4 billion ants... what are they going to do?
Andrew
On 4/5/2014 1:44 AM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
Offered for your amusement--no followup.
http://kottke.org/14/04/the-anternet
Offered for your amusement--no followup.
http://kottke.org/14/04/the-anternet
--
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
of System Administrators:
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to
Folks,
Anyone have a contact at Tishman that can help me with perimeter
security concerns at 165 Halsey? The situation in the neighborhood is
currently unsatisfactory (and unsafe) and I'd like to engage the
landlord directly. Currently a tenant of a colo provider, not the
landlord directly.
Ping
BGP Update Report
Interval: 27-Mar-14 -to- 03-Apr-14 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS36998 69594 2.8% 42.5 -- SDN-MOBITEL,SD
2 - AS982964062 2.6% 63.1 -
This report has been generated at Fri Apr 4 21:13:45 2014 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.ap
Quoting Julien Goodwin :
Show my anything short of a classic SONET transmission system (or
perhaps sync-E) where you actually have something with jitter that
low [tens of microseconds].
Since you asked, here you go: http://i.imgur.com/DvMJd5y.png
Two EndRun Unison GPS NTP servers, one in New
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Sharon Goldberg wrote>
>
>
> Actually, since this is NANOG, might as well ask:
>
> Do you all view filtering your downstream's downstreams as much more
> difficult than filtering only downstreams, or only stub ASes? Do you have
> a sense for how many networks fil
On 04/04/2014 16:17, Sharon Goldberg wrote:
> we assumed that no one filters their downstreams downstreams.
plenty of organisations do this. it can easily be done with irrdb AS sets.
Nick
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Friday, April 04, 2014 05:06:22 AM Sharon Goldberg wrote:
>
> > We also looked at prefix filtering and found that it has
> > better partial deployment characteristics. Our analysis
> > assumed that ISPs only filter routes from their *stub*
>
On 2014-04-04 09:08, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
On 4/3/14, 4:52 PM, char...@thefnf.org wrote:
Hello everyone,
It's been some time since I've been subscribed/replied/posted here (or
on WISPA for that matter). I've been pretty busy running a non profit
startup (protip: don't do that. It's really rea
On 4/3/14, 4:52 PM, char...@thefnf.org wrote:
Hello everyone,
It's been some time since I've been subscribed/replied/posted here (or
on WISPA for that matter). I've been pretty busy running a non profit
startup (protip: don't do that. It's really really terrible) :) I'm
cofounder and CTO of t
> So what, that sends IP packets, are you using to *measure* it. I can
Agilent if we need unidir. Normal run-of-the-mill 10GE SP router will give you
low single digit microsecond jitter when not congested. (You can run 99.99% no
problem, as long as you don't try >100% (i.e. >1 interface sending))
On 04/04/14 21:48, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2014-04-04 20:37 +1100), Julien Goodwin wrote:
>
>>> Meinberg[0] pegs rubidium at ±8ms per year, if you need NTP to do say single
>>> direction backbone SLA measurement you want to have microsecond precision.
>>
>> Those two statements don't go together.
>
I recently saw an interesting talk about this at 30c3, this is the way some
French ISPs are solving this:
http://media.ccc.de/browse/congress/2013/30C3_-_5391_-_en_-_saal_6_-_201312291130_-_y_u_no_isp_taking_back_the_net_-_taziden.html
D.
Oplerno is built upon empowering faculty and students
-
On (2014-04-04 20:37 +1100), Julien Goodwin wrote:
> > Meinberg[0] pegs rubidium at ±8ms per year, if you need NTP to do say single
> > direction backbone SLA measurement you want to have microsecond precision.
>
> Those two statements don't go together.
Point I was making is that free-running r
On 04/04/2014 05:06 AM, Sharon Goldberg wrote:
> Finally, like Randy says, RPKI deploys quite different from BGPSEC. My
> intuition says that (1) once the RPKI is fully populated with ROAs for all
> originated prefixes, then (2) a partial deployment of origin validation at
> a few large ISPs should
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, David Hubbard wrote:
Anyone have recommendations on NTP appliances; i.e. make, model, gps vs
cell, etc.? Roof/outdoor/window access not available. Would ideally
need to be able to handle bursts of up to a few thousand simultaneous
queries. Needs IPv6 support.
For some di
On 04/04/14 10:16, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 06:55:02PM -0400, David Hubbard wrote:
>> Anyone have recommendations on NTP appliances; i.e. make, model, gps vs
>> cell, etc.? Roof/outdoor/window access not available. Would ideally
>> need to be able to handle bursts of up to
On 04/04/14 17:29, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2014-04-03 21:25 -0700), Will Orton wrote:
>
>> There are commercially available NTP servers with GPS + Rb oscillators...
>> for NTP
>> use you could basically let it sync up a couple days, disconnect the GPS and
>> let
>> it freerun. You'd still be wi
On Fri Apr 04, 2014 at 09:42:29AM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> My device is indeed supposedly covered by a lifetime warranty. Since I'm
> still in the timeframe of less than 5 years after EOS...it should be
> good...should.
The *Limited* Lifetime Warranty is only offered to the original purchas
> That Upstream B is simply "accepting everything"
> their customer is sending to them without applying proper filters, or checking
> to confirm that what their customer needs to send them should come from
> them is absolutely and unacceptably shocking!
I wonder when (or if ever) we'll have such a
On 04/04/2014 01:51, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Brandon Ewing wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:26:58PM -0400, Michael Brown wrote:
Did you purchase SMARTnet when you bought the device? If you didn't,
you're probably SOL.
This is not true. Cisco provides a limited lif
24 matches
Mail list logo
