Replied offlist
Mehmet
> On Apr 1, 2014, at 23:11, Henri Wahl wrote:
>
> Hello,
> can someone from Microsoft responsible for security contact me off-list
> please?
> Thanks & regards
>
> --
> Henri Wahl
>
> IT Department
> Leibniz-Institut fuer Festkoerper- u.
> Werkstoffforschung Dresden
>
Hello,
can someone from Microsoft responsible for security contact me off-list
please?
Thanks & regards
--
Henri Wahl
IT Department
Leibniz-Institut fuer Festkoerper- u.
Werkstoffforschung Dresden
tel: (03 51) 46 59 - 797
email: h.w...@ifw-dresden.de
http://www.ifw-dresden.de
Nagios status mon
Hi Paul,
I use Netscaler 10.1, and “use proxy port” option depends on “use source ip”. I
don’t understand why I cannot set no for proxy port without enabling source ip.
Its very bad solution for that.
From: Paul Bertain [mailto:p...@bertain.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 4:58 PM
To: Anil KAR
From: Clay Kossmeyer
To: nanog@nanog.org
Cc: Clay Seaman-Kossmeyer (ckossmey)
Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software SSL VPN Denial of
Service Vulnerability
Hi All -
The Cisco PSIRT has been sending IOS Security Advisories to the NAN
Job,
Fun! More generally, BGP has the same computing power as a Turing Machine:
Marco Chiesa, Luca Cittadini, Guiseppe Di Battista, Laurent Vanbever, and
Stefano Vissicchio
Using routers to build logic circuits: How powerful is BGP? (ICNP'13)
http://vanbever.eu/pdfs/vanbever_turing_icnp_2
On 04/01/2014 11:44 AM, Clay Kossmeyer wrote:
Hi All -
The Cisco PSIRT has been sending IOS Security Advisories to the NANOG mailing
list for well over a decade. We started this process a long time ago at the
request of the list’s then-membership and haven’t been asked to change since.
Admit
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
The Cisco PSIRT has been sending IOS Security Advisories to
the NANOG mailing list for well over a decade
Thank you, much appreciated
Given that there are a number of forums that more directly
address either Cisco-specific issues or are specific
> The Cisco PSIRT has been sending IOS Security Advisories to
> the NANOG mailing list for well over a decade
Thank you, much appreciated
> Given that there are a number of forums that more directly
> address either Cisco-specific issues or are specific to
> vulnerability announcements, were hap
--- ckoss...@cisco.com wrote:
From: Clay Kossmeyer
[...] we’re happy to discontinue sending to the NANOG list directly.
--
Instead of discontinuing them how about one email that contains
all the details, rather than one email per detail. Simi
On Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:24:32 -0400, "Chuck Church" said:
> Given that probably 80+% (a guess, but I'd be really surprised at a lower
> figure) of all internet traffic crosses at least one Cisco device somewhere,
> I think it would be a huge disservice to discontinue sending these emails.
Actually,
Given that probably 80+% (a guess, but I'd be really surprised at a lower
figure) of all internet traffic crosses at least one Cisco device somewhere,
I think it would be a huge disservice to discontinue sending these emails.
10 to 15 emails per year isn't much overhead, compared to seemingly
never
Hi All -
The Cisco PSIRT has been sending IOS Security Advisories to the NANOG mailing
list for well over a decade. We started this process a long time ago at the
request of the list’s then-membership and haven’t been asked to change since.
Admittedly, vulnerability disclosure/discussion/repo
Replied Off-list
Mehmet
> On Apr 1, 2014, at 10:53, Casey Deccio wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for a Microsoft mail contact, specifically for MTAs in
> 2a01:111:f400::/48 address space. Please contact me off-list.
>
> Thanks,
> Casey
Hi all,
I'm looking for a Microsoft mail contact, specifically for MTAs in
2a01:111:f400::/48 address space. Please contact me off-list.
Thanks,
Casey
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014, Job Snijders wrote:
Do you often find yourself in need of a simple calculator, and all you
have available to you is a Brocade or Cisco IOS router? No longer will
you experience the horror and dread of mental arithmetics. The route-map
calculator is here!
Is this meant as
Hi all,
Do you often find yourself in need of a simple calculator, and all you have
available to you is a Brocade or Cisco IOS router? No longer will you
experience the horror and dread of mental arithmetics. The route-map calculator
is here!
Brocade : http://instituut.net/~job/calculator-rout
Hi Anil,
The command is for the service or servicegroup and it is:
set service -useproxyport (NO|YES)
Paul
> On Apr 1, 2014, at 1:38, Anil KARADAG wrote:
>
> My aim is forwarding all sip packages from netscaler snip:client port number
> to backend server ip: backend server port. I tried the
My aim is forwarding all sip packages from netscaler snip:client port number to
backend server ip: backend server port. I tried the following scenarios;
- "use source ip" is enabled, "use proxy port" is set no
o Result: we see client port as source port but no SNIP for source ip-add
Have you configured RNAT yet? Might tidy up your SIP problem. Do you need
the servers to see the client's source port, or is your issue that SIP
response traffic is not on the port the client expects?
Give the guide to setting up RNAT here a try -
http://support.citrix.com/proddocs/topic/netscaler
Maybe you did not understand my message. I know what you say. However:
I see a message from a list as a message-from-a-list , not as a
forwarded-message-from-a-list-user. Because: How can a user authorize someone
to send a message on behalf of his/her name (by sending an email). This should
not
20 matches
Mail list logo
