Hi everybody,
I have change my core router from 7206 VXR to 7606 with RSP720 since last 1
month.
I had GRE Tunnel in 7206 with one of my regions with this config:
interface Tunnel1
> ip mtu 1500
> ip policy route-map clear-df
I have copy this config to new 7606 with the same config but now I h
No one from XO monitors the list? We have a cpl people from AT&T networks
reporting the same issues now.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Mikeal Clark wrote:
> Glad someone else is seeing it. TWC wasn't much help. Not sure how to
> follow up on this but I have 3 sites that can't stay online b
Glad someone else is seeing it. TWC wasn't much help. Not sure how to
follow up on this but I have 3 sites that can't stay online because of it.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Greg Smythe wrote:
> I'm seeing a problem between that IP and another XO router at
> 207.88.14.193
>
>
>
> -=-=-=-=
I'm seeing a problem between that IP and another XO router at 207.88.14.193
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-
Greg Smythe
-Original Message-
From: Mikeal Clark [mailto:mikeal.cl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 6:19 PM
To: NANOG [nanog@nanog.org]
Subject: XO/TWC problems?
I'm see
I'm seeing packet loss between XO and TWC.
206.111.2.89 seems to be the problem. Anyone else seeing similar?
Hello All,
I am trying to find an example config on how to configure QinQ/802.1ad/PB
on the Brocade MLX8 platform.
I have found some basic examples for PBB/Mac in Mac, but not a complete
config for 802.1ad
Can anyone on the list help?
Thanks!
> Hi,
>
> I've been working on a basic configuration for E-OAM starting with one
> domain. I have CFM working between the PEs (IOS-XR) devices tied to an
> EoMPLS instance, but have a few questions below:
>
> 1) I "think" I should be seeing MIPs in my traceroute when there is a P
> router in betwee
Thanks Bill. Clearly my Google-fu was failing because of plugging in
anachronistic terms when searching for a document that is only barely
old enough to drive.
-r
bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com writes:
> RFC 2182
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 02:57:06PM -0400, Rob Seastrom wrote:
>>
>> L
RFC 2182
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 02:57:06PM -0400, Rob Seastrom wrote:
>
> Larry Sheldon writes:
>
> > On 3/7/2014 5:03 AM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
> >
> >> for decades. i have a vague recollection of an rfc that said
> >> secondary nameservers ought not be connected to the same psn (rememb
Larry Sheldon writes:
> On 3/7/2014 5:03 AM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
>
>> for decades. i have a vague recollection of an rfc that said
>> secondary nameservers ought not be connected to the same psn (remember
>> those?) but my google fu fails me this early in the morning.
>
> Packet Switch Node?
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
