Re: Catalyst IOS refresher site?

If it were me I would pickup a SupIII or SupIV off ebay. They are pretty cheap. Justin --- Justin Wilson MTIN Consulting Mikrotik ­ UBNT ­ Climbing ­ Network Design http://www.mtin.net/ http://www.thebrotherswisp.com -Original Message- From: Jay

Comcast/Level3 issues

Looking for a networking contact at comcast and/or level3. I've been having some slow speed issues with hitting some sites that's going through level3 and I think there might be some congestion. Doug

Re: Query: fate of ipdeny.com

On 1/1/2014 4:44 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > ipdeny.com provided a highly useful service: IP address allocations > on a per-country basis. The site's still live but all (or nearly > all) the data files are empty. The blog hasn't been updated, and > email via their contact form goes unanswered. I'

Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches

On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > On (2013-12-31 23:04 +), Warren Bailey wrote: > > > that RSA had a check cut for their participation (sell outs..), would it > > be out of the realm of possibility cisco knowingly placed this into their > > product line? And would it be thei

Query: fate of ipdeny.com

ipdeny.com provided a highly useful service: IP address allocations on a per-country basis. The site's still live but all (or nearly all) the data files are empty. The blog hasn't been updated, and email via their contact form goes unanswered. I'd like to know if anybody here has a clue as to wh

Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches

On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > Is this legal? Can NSA walk in to US based company and legally coerce to > install such backdoor? If not, what is the incentive for private company to > cooperate? > As evidenced by "Lavabit"; apparently, one thing that they CAN do is issue an

Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches

On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 11:55:37 +0200, Saku Ytti said: > Is this legal? Can NSA walk in to US based company and legally coerce to > install such backdoor? Well, legal or not... we will probably never know exactly what was said, but apparently the NSA was able to convince/coerce many of the 800 pound

Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches

Warren Bailey > I find it insanely difficult to believe cisco systems has a backdoor > into some of their product lines with no knowledge or participation. actually, i suspect a mix of both, the usg encouraging calea gone bad (while committing to bad-mouth huawei), and the TAO crew developing ser

Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches

Thank you Randy for pointing that out. However take into account the NANOG list is moderated, and my comment was delayed for moderation. I was commenting on posts about trivial things, before that nice post with nice codenames. A good year to all. May this be a smoother year to you all that have s

Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches

> If legal, consider risk to NSA. Official product ran inside company to add > requested feature, hundred of people aware of it. Seems both expensive to > order such feature and almost guaranteed to be exposed by some of the > employees. > > Alternative method is to presume all software is insecur

Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches

On (2013-12-31 23:04 +), Warren Bailey wrote: > that RSA had a check cut for their participation (sell outs..), would it > be out of the realm of possibility cisco knowingly placed this into their > product line? And would it be their mistake to come out with a “we had no > idea!” rather than

Re: First! [?]

Happy New Year! Tri Tran -Original Message- From: "A Mekkaoui" Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 02:45:01 To: ; 'Beavis'; 'Bryan Tong' Cc: 'NANOG list' Subject: RE: First! [?] Happy new year to all of you, all the best! Karim -Original Message- From: Christopher Young [mailto:chris.yo...