Re: Meraki

Okay.. Get me my stick.. Morrow is in for it. ;) Sent from my Mobile Device. Original message From: Christopher Morrow Date: 11/20/2013 7:50 PM (GMT-09:00) To: Warren Bailey Cc: Ricky Beam ,nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Meraki On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Warren Baile

Re: Meraki

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Warren Bailey wrote: > If we had cheerios.. You just urinated in them. :( > > Sometimes a joke should be a joke to laugh at.. Not discredit. Next time we > will beat Morrow for not being funny enough.. ;) you CAN spin up a new LLC for less than their cheapy AP..

Re: Meraki

If we had cheerios.. You just urinated in them. :( Sometimes a joke should be a joke to laugh at.. Not discredit. Next time we will beat Morrow for not being funny enough.. ;) Sent from my Mobile Device. Original message From: Ricky Beam Date: 11/20/2013 11:32 AM (GMT-09:00

Re: Dynamic routing through firewall

On Nov 21, 2013, at 4:21 AM, Cliff Bowles wrote: > Finally, if you tried one of the options and it was terrible, please explain. They're all terrible, heh. Get the firewalls out of the picture: Stateful firewalls should not be placed in front of s

Re: NAT64 and matching identities

On 11/20/13 4:30 PM, "Gary E. Miller" wrote: >Yo Lee! > >On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:14:47 -0500 >Lee Howard wrote: > >> >There is obviously a long tail of ip4 destinations, but nearly all >> >of 500 of the Alexa global 500 have ip6 listeners, >> >> Do you have a data source for that? I see no in

Re: NAT64 and matching identities

Yo Lee! On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:14:47 -0500 Lee Howard wrote: > >There is obviously a long tail of ip4 destinations, but nearly all > >of 500 of the Alexa global 500 have ip6 listeners, > > Do you have a data source for that? I see no indication of IPv6 > listeners on 85% of the top sites. A s

Dynamic routing through firewall

Request for feedback... We have a need for an external partner to dynamically advertise their network to us in two separate data centers. The hitch is that, touching external partners, our edge routers for B2B partners reside in DMZs. Now, to ensure failover from one data center to another when

Re: NAT64 and matching identities

Leaving out stuff . . . On 11/19/13 6:53 PM, "Ian Smith" wrote: > >There is obviously a long tail of ip4 destinations, but nearly all of 500 >of the Alexa global 500 have ip6 listeners, Do you have a data source for that? I see no indication of IPv6 listeners on 85% of the top sites. Lee

Re: Meraki

On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:36:42 -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote: so you just decide: "How many may we have to deploy?" then schedule that many pitch meetings with them? :) Heh. No. It's not supposed to work like that. They want a verifiable company for the free (cheapest, most basic) AP. And

Re: Meraki

On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:08:53 -0500, Ray Soucy said: > I'm very interested in other user experiences with Ubiquity for > smaller deployments vs. traditional Cisco APs and WLC. > Especially for a collection of rural areas. The price point and > software controller are very attracti

Re: BGP neighbor/configuration testing

On 11/20/13, 11:53 AM, Eric A Louie wrote: > Scenario: a regional ISP preparing to cutover to a new upstream BGP provider > at one of my POPs. Want minimal or no network disruption, and want to ensure > everything is ready to go prior to the cutover. > > I'm planning to use the following order

Re: BGP neighbor/configuration testing

On 2013-11-20, at 14:53, Eric A Louie wrote: > Scenario: a regional ISP preparing to cutover to a new upstream BGP provider > at one of my POPs. Want minimal or no network disruption, and want to ensure > everything is ready to go prior to the cutover. > > I'm planning to use the following

BGP neighbor/configuration testing

Scenario: a regional ISP preparing to cutover to a new upstream BGP provider at one of my POPs.  Want minimal or no network disruption, and want to ensure everything is ready to go prior to the cutover.  I'm planning to use the following order of operations: 1. Establish IP connectivity to the n

Re: Meraki

I'm very interested in other user experiences with Ubiquity for smaller deployments vs. traditional Cisco APs and WLC. Especially for a collection of rural areas. The price point and software controller are very attractive. Anyone running a centralized controller for a lot of remote sites? On

Re: [renesys] The New Threat: Targeted Internet Traffic Misdirection

someone has already parsed out all route announcements from ris/routeviews for the 2 specific incidents in question in the article? and posted the contents somewhere for review? I didn't see Renesys do that :( So, they've got some unsupported conclusions that are tough to get behind absent that dat

Re: Meraki

Meraki did not work for me in a high density office environment, with heavy wireless usage. Kept dropping clients at peak times. We went with Aruba. On 11/19/13 9:25 AM, Hank Disuko wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've traditionally been a Cisco Catalyst shop for my switching gear. > > I am doing a si

RE: Meraki

Just finished a project doing an entire convention center with Xirrus. Awesome results and many more options than Meraki. I would say that it was one of those signature projects that had to happen in a very short schedule and we had to provide support for the event. Onsite engineers stated th

Looking for a Charter Backbone Engineer

If there is a Charter backbone engineer on the list could you email me off list. I am having a peculiar issue with a charter connection and support can't seem to figure it out. Thanks Dylan Ebner, Network Engineer Consulting Radiologists, Ltd. 1221 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55403 ph. 612.5