Re: CDN node locations

2013-11-17 Thread Martin Hannigan
There are a number of us here. Best, -M< On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Warren Bailey < wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote: > U.. So who gets to field the Akamai questions now? ;) > > > Sent from my Mobile Device. > > > Original message > From: "Patrick W.

Re: Best band for your buck router and switch (gigabit)

2013-11-17 Thread Pablo Lucena
What about a Cisco cloud services router? These devices scale quite nicely. You can even use them for 60 days on a trial license. On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Mike Hale wrote: > We get ours from Network Hardware Resellers. It's > Smartnet-contractable, which is important for us, and was pre

Re: Cisco announces it will no longer publishing The Internet Protocol Journal

2013-11-17 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Ole is not with Cisco anymore. Regards, Jeff > On Nov 17, 2013, at 10:11, "Courtney Smith" wrote: > > Another one bites the dust. Received the below this AM. Hopefully, > something similar finds it's way into an electronic format. > > > TO OUR READERS > > At this time, Cisco Systems, Inc

Re: Cisco announces it will no longer publishing The Internet Protocol Journal

2013-11-17 Thread Livingood, Jason
While Cisco won¹t solely publish it, I¹d call it too soon to say it is dead. ;-) Ole (copied) is a pretty resourceful guy and is working on ways to keep it going. Ping him 1:1 if you would like more info or like to help. Jason On 11/17/13, 1:09 PM, "Courtney Smith" wrote: >Another one bites th

Cisco announces it will no longer publishing The Internet Protocol Journal

2013-11-17 Thread Courtney Smith
Another one bites the dust. Received the below this AM. Hopefully, something similar finds it's way into an electronic format. TO OUR READERS At this time, Cisco Systems, Inc. has decided not to continue publishing The Internet Protocol Journal (IPJ) effective immediately. Cisco wishes to

Re: Question on routing of Tata AS6453 with their other network AS4755

2013-11-17 Thread Michael Smith
On Nov 16, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Anurag Bhatia wrote: > Hello everyone > > > I was looking around and noticed a pretty bad route from DTAG to Tata > AS6453 (basically destination was Tata Comm's Indian network on AS4755). I > am not able to understand cause for inefficient routing but I am sure I