somehow, a serious case of testosterone poisoning combined with insane
goal drift has hit a number of the large european exchanges. instead of
the goal being how well they serve their local communities, they have
gone wild with sleazy means of having traffic contests, doing really
sick attempts at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 17/09/2013 20:15, Patrick W. Gilmore a écrit :
> On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:11 , Martin T wrote:
>
>> Thanks for all the replies!
>>
>>
>> Nick,
>>
>> counting traffic on inter-switch links is kind of cheating, isn't it?
>> I mean if "input bytes" and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 17/09/2013 20:15, Patrick W. Gilmore a écrit :
Hi,
Good reading, to get an idea:
https://www1.ethz.ch/csg/people/dimitroc/papers/p95pam.pdf
Section 3, mainly.
Cheers,
mh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Com
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Matthew Petach wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote:
>> > On Sep 16, 2013, at 19:07, "Matthew Petach"
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:25 AM, wrote:
In a message written on Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:11:23PM +0300, Martin T wrote:
counting traffic on inter-switch links is kind of cheating, isn't
it? I mean if "input bytes" and "output bytes" on all the ports
facing the IX members are already counted, then counting traffic
on links between the
In a message written on Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:11:23PM +0300, Martin T wrote:
> counting traffic on inter-switch links is kind of cheating, isn't it?
> I mean if "input bytes" and "output bytes" on all the ports facing the
> IX members are already counted, then counting traffic on links between
>
On 9/17/2013 2:51 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:11:23PM +0300, Martin T wrote:
counting traffic on inter-switch links is kind of cheating, isn't it?
I mean if "input bytes" and "output bytes" on all the ports facing the
IX members are already counted, th
On 17/09/2013 2:15 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:11 , Martin T wrote:
Thanks for all the replies!
Nick,
counting traffic on inter-switch links is kind of cheating, isn't it?
I mean if "input bytes" and "output bytes" on all the ports facing the
IX members are already
On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:11 , Martin T wrote:
> Thanks for all the replies!
>
>
> Nick,
>
> counting traffic on inter-switch links is kind of cheating, isn't it?
> I mean if "input bytes" and "output bytes" on all the ports facing the
> IX members are already counted, then counting traffic on li
On Sep 17, 2013, at 11:04 , Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 17/09/2013 14:43, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>> And yes, DE-CIX is more than well aware everyone thinks this is .. uh ..
>> let's just call it "silly" for now, although most would use far more
>> disparaging words. Which is probably why no seri
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote:
> > On Sep 16, 2013, at 19:07, "Matthew Petach"
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:25 AM, wrote:
> >>
> >>> Can someone from rr.com please contact me. Your abuse desk
Thanks for all the replies!
Nick,
counting traffic on inter-switch links is kind of cheating, isn't it?
I mean if "input bytes" and "output bytes" on all the ports facing the
IX members are already counted, then counting traffic on links between
the switches in fabric will count some of the traf
On 17/09/2013 14:43, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> And yes, DE-CIX is more than well aware everyone thinks this is .. uh ..
> let's just call it "silly" for now, although most would use far more
> disparaging words. Which is probably why no serious IXP does it.
It's not silly - it's just not what ev
Hi,
when one end-customer has been using for example /24 IPv4 allocation
for a while and returns this(for example changes an ISP) to LIR, then
are there some good practices before handing out this same /24 to a
new customer? I guess LIR should:
1) remove all the DNS PTR records, classless of clas
I'm not sure of te topology around there, but you can get these 2.4Ghz
dishes for *cheap* (I got one at a hamfest for $20 - spent as much on the
rp-sma converter cost almost as much). If someone (or a colo) is near
there, you might convince them to put up the same thing and work with that.
I think
On Sep 17, 2013, at 07:02 , Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 17/09/2013 11:52, Martin T wrote:
>> Is there a common method to count this traffic on a switch-fabric?
>> Just read all the switch interface "packets input" counters with an
>> interval to get the aggregated input traffic and read all the swi
WISPA.ORG would be a good resource.
Dustin Jurman C.E.O
Rapid Systems Corporation
1211 North Westshore BLVD suite 711
Tampa, Fl 33607
"Building Better Infrastructure"
On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:38 AM, "Christopher Morrow"
wrote:
> the katsucon folks do this hotel yearly... maybe finding them wou
On 17/09/2013 11:52, Martin T wrote:
> Is there a common method to count this traffic on a switch-fabric?
> Just read all the switch interface "packets input" counters with an
> interval to get the aggregated input traffic and read all the switch
> interfaces "packets output" counters to get the ag
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Martin T wrote:
Is there a common method to count this traffic on a switch-fabric? Just
read all the switch interface "packets input" counters with an interval
to get the aggregated input traffic and read all the switch interfaces
"packets output" counters to get the aggre
Hi,
many Internet exchange points post publicly available graphs which
describe aggregated traffic volumes on IX. For example:
Netnod: http://www.netnod.se/ix-stats/sums/
AMS-IX: https://www.ams-ix.net/technical/statistics
LINX: https://www.linx.net/pubtools/trafficstats.html
Is there a common
20 matches
Mail list logo
