IANA AS Numbers registry update

2013-05-30 Thread Selina Harrington
The IANA AS Numbers registry has been updated to reflect the allocation of 1 block to ARIN in 2013-05-30: 62464-63487 You can find the IANA AS Numbers registry at: http://www.iana.org/assignments/as-numbers/as-numbers.xml Regards, Selina Harrington ***

Re: Verizon NY (LEC) prior notification

2013-05-30 Thread Patrick
On 2013-05-31 04:07, Warren Bailey wrote: > Sadly, I agree. If anyone is there late, it's a noc administrator looking at > pictures of cats. Sure. However, when you know the switch (or special circuits) techs and occasionally eat where they do, you'll probably catch an FYI or two that switch X th

Re: A bit of historical news

2013-05-30 Thread Heather Schiller
Congrats.. now get on with Global AS and merge all those 70x's together! :) --h On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Christopher Morrow < christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS19262view=2.0 > > note the list of 'withdrawn' ... err, 19262 is no mo

Re: Verizon NY (LEC) prior notification

2013-05-30 Thread Warren Bailey
Sadly, I agree. If anyone is there late, it's a noc administrator looking at pictures of cats. Sent from my Mobile Device. Original message From: "Justin M. Streiner" Date: 05/30/2013 8:11 PM (GMT-08:00) To: Patrick Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Verizon NY (LEC) prior no

Re: Verizon NY (LEC) prior notification

2013-05-30 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Fri, 31 May 2013, Patrick wrote: On 2013-05-30 21:43, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: May not be workable without a sufficiently high call rate 24/7. If you're a small call center that usually has 3-4 calls per hour at 2AM, now long is "too long without a call, time to get suspicious"? Cor

Re: Verizon NY (LEC) prior notification

2013-05-30 Thread Patrick
On 2013-05-30 21:43, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > May not be workable without a sufficiently high call rate 24/7. If you're a > small call center that usually has 3-4 calls per hour at 2AM, now long is "too > long without a call, time to get suspicious"? Correct. Alternatively, perhaps VZ ha

Re: Verizon NY (LEC) prior notification

2013-05-30 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 31 May 2013 09:04:17 +0800, Patrick said: > Probably better to watch stats for each NPA-NXX calling each DID. You > can fit a distribution to the data for the length of time before another > call arrives, and automatically throw a ticket at your carrier support > group when the time betwee

Re: Verizon NY (LEC) prior notification

2013-05-30 Thread Patrick
On 2013-05-30 16:37, Christopher J. Pilkington wrote: > Is anyone aware of a method to "mark" or "flag" certain services with > Verizon NY (the LEC) as critical, such that changes aren't made to the > services without prior notification? I know it's a lot to ask of Verizon. Probably better to wat

Verizon NY (LEC) prior notification

2013-05-30 Thread Christopher J. Pilkington
Is anyone aware of a method to "mark" or "flag" certain services with Verizon NY (the LEC) as critical, such that changes aren't made to the services without prior notification? I know it's a lot to ask of Verizon. We experienced an outage on a number of PRI that were rehomed to another switch wi

FIXED: Mail contact needed at CenturyLink.com

2013-05-30 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Jay Ashworth" > The Outages list is receiving hard bounces from *some* email address > hosted at Qwest/Centurylink. Thanks to Don and Theresa at Qwest/CenturyLink for identifying the relevant address so we could unsubscribe it; I gather the bouncer which doe

Re: ipp.gov and Google DNS (8.8.8.8)

2013-05-30 Thread Yunhong Gu
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Casey Deccio wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Yunhong Gu wrote: > > Google resolvers got no response (i.e. timeout) for ipp.gov/dnskey from > its > > authoritative name servers. If there is anyone on this list who manages > > ipp.gov DNS servers, please

Re: why does dail-up or pppoe access always has session-timeout ?

2013-05-30 Thread Jean-Francois Mezei
On 13-05-30 05:10, Joe wrote: > a question obsessed me for a long time. "why my pppoe connection to > internet has a max session time, even if every thing goes ok? " > In our DSL access network , max session timeout is set to 4 days, this > parameter is sent to BAS by radius server after

Re: ipp.gov and Google DNS (8.8.8.8)

2013-05-30 Thread Casey Deccio
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Yunhong Gu wrote: > Google resolvers got no response (i.e. timeout) for ipp.gov/dnskey from its > authoritative name servers. If there is anyone on this list who manages > ipp.gov DNS servers, please take a look. Our resolver IPs can be found at > https://developer

Re: why does dail-up or pppoe access always has session-timeout ?

2013-05-30 Thread Warren Bailey
It also probably has something to do with oversubscription. Providers generally allocated trunks (most dial up providers I knew used Livingston Port Masters), however their subscriber base was much larger than the number of phone lines available to take incoming calls. If you time out idle users, y

Re: why does dail-up or pppoe access always has session-timeout ?

2013-05-30 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 30 May 2013 09:10:21 -, Joe said: > a question obsessed me for a long time. "why my pppoe connection to > internet has a max session time, even if every thing goes ok? " >From a provider's point of view, forcing a connection to re-establish itself every few days means that if you

Re: ipp.gov and Google DNS (8.8.8.8)

2013-05-30 Thread Yunhong Gu
Google resolvers got no response (i.e. timeout) for ipp.gov/dnskey from its authoritative name servers. If there is anyone on this list who manages ipp.gov DNS servers, please take a look. Our resolver IPs can be found at https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/faq#locations. Thanks Yunhon

Re: ipp.gov and Google DNS (8.8.8.8)

2013-05-30 Thread Casey Deccio
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:04:44AM -0600, > Josh Galvez wrote > a message of 135 lines which said: > >> DNSSEC seems to be validating properly. > > Since Google Public DNS returns SERVFAIL even with the +cd option > (Checking Disable

Re: why does dail-up or pppoe access always has session-timeout ?

2013-05-30 Thread Clayton Zekelman
The simple answer is that it does not. If you don't specify a session timeout, the session will not timeout. This is how we run our PPPoE services. The protocol and BAS designer does not set the parameter - the network operator does. At 05:10 AM 30/05/2013, Joe wrote: hi. a question obs

Re: ipp.gov and Google DNS (8.8.8.8)

2013-05-30 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:04:44AM -0600, Josh Galvez wrote a message of 135 lines which said: > DNSSEC seems to be validating properly. Since Google Public DNS returns SERVFAIL even with the +cd option (Checking Disabled), I suspect that it is not a DNSSEC issue at all.

ipp.gov and Google DNS (8.8.8.8)

2013-05-30 Thread Josh Galvez
Google Public DNS (8.8.8.8, 8.8.4.4) is failing to resolve ipp.gov, returning a SERVFAIL. Other DNS servers seem to resolve this just fine (ie. OpenDNS) If I use dig +trace, I get appropriate results all the way down. DNSSEC seems to be validating properly. http://dnssec-debugger.verisignlabs.co

RE: why does dail-up or pppoe access always has session-timeout ?

2013-05-30 Thread Fred Reimer
Because PPPOE comes from PPP, which was designed for dialup. You typically don't want to leave a dialup connection up forever. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Joe Date: 05/30/2013 5:11 AM (GMT-05:00) To: NANOG Subject: why does dail-

why does dail-up or pppoe access always has session-timeout ?

2013-05-30 Thread Joe
hi. a question obsessed me for a long time. "why my pppoe connection to internet has a max session time, even if every thing goes ok? " In our DSL access network , max session timeout is set to 4 days, this parameter is sent to BAS by radius server after finishing authenticating procedu