Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-23 Thread Matt Palmer
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 07:47:12PM -0700, Kyle Creyts wrote: > You do realize that there are quite a few people (home broadband > subscribers?) who just "go do something else" when their internet goes > down, right? [...] > Will they really demand ubiquitous, unabridged connectivity? > > When?

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-23 Thread Kyle Creyts
You do realize that there are quite a few people (home broadband subscribers?) who just "go do something else" when their internet goes down, right? There are people who don't understand the difference between "a site being slow" and packet-loss. For many of these people, losing internet service c

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-23 Thread Owen DeLong
On Mar 23, 2013, at 12:12 , Jimmy Hess wrote: > On 3/23/13, Owen DeLong wrote: >> A reliable cost-effective means for FTL signaling is a hard problem without >> a known solution. > > Faster than light signalling is not merely a hard problem. > Special relativity doesn't provide that informatio

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-23 Thread William Herrin
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:44 PM, wrote: > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:16:57 -0500, Owen DeLong said: >> On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: >> > Based on the average clue of your average residential subscriber (anyone >> > here need not apply) I'd say that's a good thing. > >> If BGP we

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-23 Thread Jimmy Hess
On 3/23/13, Owen DeLong wrote: > A reliable cost-effective means for FTL signaling is a hard problem without > a known solution. Faster than light signalling is not merely a hard problem. Special relativity doesn't provide that information may travel faster than the maximum speed C.If you wan

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-23 Thread Owen DeLong
On Mar 22, 2013, at 15:44 , wrote: > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:16:57 -0500, Owen DeLong said: >> On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: >>> Based on the average clue of your average residential subscriber (anyone >>> here need not apply) I'd say that's a good thing. > >> If BGP were pl

Sabey opens Intergate.Manhattan DC

2013-03-23 Thread Jay Ashworth
1M sq ft datacenter in former VZN CO at 375 Pearl: http://www.wallstreetandtech.com/it-infrastructure/worlds-largest-high-rise-data-center-ope/240151399 >From the story: """ Intergate.Manhattan is not only one of the largest facilities [at 32 stories, all rentable space], but it also the only