You won't be able to get many choices there. Given its a Hutchison
building, thought about Hutchison?
You'll need a local loop otherwise, coverage is probably not easy too and
being a hutch building, you wont get much choice.
Other recommendations (if you forget about local loop issues), Pacnet,
On 27 February 2013 11:47, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Feb 27, 2013, at 7:39 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Jared Mauch"
>>
>>> Sad as we all know the main cost for 1g to a site is in the optics
>>> (well actually the fiber build... But after that, it costs al
Hi Folks,
Any recommendation for a 1 Gig Transit provider at Hutchison Cavendish
Centre? Has to be able to black hole DDOS attack using BGP communities.
Preferable: Tier 1 provider with US present (IAD would be best)
HK NSP mailing list doesn't exist anymore?
Thanks.
Regards,
-lmn
On Feb 27, 2013, at 7:39 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Jared Mauch"
>
>> Sad as we all know the main cost for 1g to a site is in the optics
>> (well actually the fiber build... But after that, it costs almost
>> nothing to light it at 1g). A pair of 20km opti
info on bmpreceiver below..
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:24 PM, chip wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have an application that needs to gather BGP RIB data from the routers
> that connect to all of our upstream providers. Basically I need to know
> all the routes available from a particular provider.
On 2/27/13 6:26 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
The reason is Hilton outsources it to AT&T. They don't build the networks for
performance in my experience. I have started to avoid some hotels that moved from
level3 to AT&T for their Internet providers as they are very slow at peak times.
Sad as we all
Defense in Depth has been paid lipservice for too long, and now we are
witnessing the outcome.
> -- Original Message --
> From: Adele Thompson
> To: Kyle Creyts
> Cc: Derek Noggle , nanog@nanog.org
> Date: February 27, 2013 at 1:24 AM
> Subject: Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Jared Mauch"
> Sad as we all know the main cost for 1g to a site is in the optics
> (well actually the fiber build... But after that, it costs almost
> nothing to light it at 1g). A pair of 20km optics is about $250.
I see that assertion a lot, and I want to
The reason is Hilton outsources it to AT&T. They don't build the networks for
performance in my experience. I have started to avoid some hotels that moved
from level3 to AT&T for their Internet providers as they are very slow at peak
times.
Sad as we all know the main cost for 1g to a site is
>The property jumped on-board in the late nineties, putting in a system
>worthy of the next decade...
>and has never updated it, cause it's "good enough".
This is more likely the root cause of this particular problemŠyou see a
lot of crufty old access points in the big chains, at least in hotels
I'm evaluating between cBeyond, Cox, and Megapath.
Anyone have experience with their ethernet over copper or fiber products?
How are their reliability, service, and performance?
Regards,
Tri Tran
On 27/02/2013 03:51, Randy wrote:
> *received-routes*?
> If you still enable soft-reconfig-inbound on your routers(customer-facing
> sessions not withstanding), you most certainly hate your routers more than
> OP...;-)
it impacts memory, but if your management plane has enough memory to handle
i
12 matches
Mail list logo
