Re: puck.nether.net outage?

On Feb 13, 2013, at 4:00 PM, Jay Nugent wrote: > Greetings, > > On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Christopher Morrow >> wrote: apparently jared's working on it. >> >> sorry, also: "should be better later today" >> is the update...

Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 61, Issue 88

On Feb 13, 2013, at 4:00 PM, nanog-requ...@nanog.org wrote: > -- > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:50:50 -0800 > From: Sean Lazar > To: Michael Thomas > Cc: NANOG list > Subject: Re: home network monitoring and shaping > Message-ID: <511be08a.4020...@toast

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

Game. Blouses. >From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network. Original message From: Mark Andrews Date: 02/13/2013 5:25 PM (GMT-08:00) To: Masataka Ohta Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2? In message <511c3a4a.7050...@necom830.hpc

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

In message <511c3a4a.7050...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, Masataka Ohta writes: > Edward Dore wrote: > > > Sadly, despite this being challenged with both the telecoms > > regulator (Ofcom) and advertising watchdog (ASA), for some > > reason both seem pretty happy with the utter farce that is > >

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

Edward Dore wrote: > Sadly, despite this being challenged with both the telecoms > regulator (Ofcom) and advertising watchdog (ASA), for some > reason both seem pretty happy with the utter farce that is > advertising BT/OpenReach's VDSL based Fibre To The Cabinet > and Virgin Media's Hybrid Fibre

Re: NOC display software

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:19 AM, JoeSox wrote: > Just wondering if anyone can recommend Windows software (it could be > Linux too but I might need to create a separate host for that > configuration) > that enables rotating [on one monitor] several webpages (dashboards) > or windows (application da

RE: NOC display software

I use a VBScript that just ALT Tabs to go from screen to screen. -Original Message- From: Livio Zanol Puppim [mailto:livio.zanol.pup...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 4:17 PM To: Calin Chiorean Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: NOC display software You can do this using Jav

Re: NOC display software

You can do this using Javascript as well... 2013/2/13 Calin Chiorean > Hello, > > This should also work and can be customised however you want: > > http://pastebin.com/ty324mr8 > > I did add a test version at http://atl.ezeea.com/rotate.html just to check > it if you want. > > HTH, > Calin > > O

Re: puck.nether.net outage?

Greetings, On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote: On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: apparently jared's working on it. sorry, also: "should be better later today" is the update... Or the term we used at the ANS NOC (internally, of course) was: "It b

Re: NOC display software

Hello, This should also work and can be customised however you want: http://pastebin.com/ty324mr8 I did add a test version at http://atl.ezeea.com/rotate.html just to check it if you want. HTH, Calin On 2/13/13 4:19 PM, "JoeSox" wrote: >Just wondering if anyone can recommend Windows software

Re: puck.nether.net outage?

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: >> >> apparently jared's working on it. sorry, also: "should be better later today" is the update...

Re: puck.nether.net outage?

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > wait, email outages! wait! :) > > apparently jared's working on it. oh sorry,. 'whats going on' == zombie attack... > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Jay Ashworth

Re: puck.nether.net outage?

wait, email outages! wait! :) apparently jared's working on it. On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > Checking; thanks. > - jra > > Brian Dickson wrote: > >>Anyone know about puck.nether.net? >> >>I read the "outages" list via web archive there, but can't connect >>currently. >

Re: puck.nether.net outage?

Checking; thanks. - jra Brian Dickson wrote: >Anyone know about puck.nether.net? > >I read the "outages" list via web archive there, but can't connect >currently. > >(I know - irony or what.) > >If you know what's going on, please post on NANOG? > >kthanks, > >Brian -- Sent from my Android pho

Re: IPv6 support by wifi systems

Rather old document from 2010: Cisco + IPv6 over CAPWAP protocol: http://d2zmdbbm9feqrf.cloudfront.net/2012/usa/pdf/BRKEWN-2010.pdf

puck.nether.net outage?

Anyone know about puck.nether.net? I read the "outages" list via web archive there, but can't connect currently. (I know - irony or what.) If you know what's going on, please post on NANOG? kthanks, Brian

Re: home network monitoring and shaping

I've had good luck with a via mini ITX board and http://ipcop.org/ This was in 2005 so things may have changed/progressed. It wasn't hard to give out some static dhcp leases and look at graphs and see who the bandwidth piggies were, and then set some throttling. Housemates weren't kicking down an

Re: home network monitoring and shaping

On 02/12/2013 04:46 PM, Joel Maslak wrote: Large buffers have broken the average home internet. I can't tell you how many people are astonished when I say "one of your family members downloading a huge Microsoft ISO image (via TCP or other congestion-aware algorithm) shouldn't even be noticed by

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

Sadly, despite this being challenged with both the telecoms regulator (Ofcom) and advertising watchdog (ASA), for some reason both seem pretty happy with the utter farce that is advertising BT/OpenReach's VDSL based Fibre To The Cabinet and Virgin Media's Hybrid Fibre Coax networks as "fibre opt

Re: IPv6 support by wifi systems

Access point support from many vendors seems okay. But another vendor gap on IPv6 is WiFi AAA, policy servers, and tunnel servers from vendors like Ericsson and ALU. I hope to see richer IPv6 support for these aspects of WiFi (helpful for those operating lots of outdoor WiFi systems for example).

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

- Original Message - > From: "Masataka Ohta" > If you can't accept the shown reality that PON is more expensive > than SS and insist on stating it were my opinion without any > evidences, its your arrogance. > > PERIOD. Nope. It's you, dude. Really. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashwor

Re: NOC display software

On 13-2-2013 16:19, JoeSox wrote: > Just wondering if anyone can recommend Windows software (it could be > Linux too but I might need to create a separate host for that > configuration) > that enables rotating [on one monitor] several webpages (dashboards) > or windows (application dashboards). > I

Re: NOC display software

On 13/02/13 15:19, JoeSox wrote: > Just wondering if anyone can recommend Windows software This pains me to do this My quick google fu: http://www.autohotkey.com/ Loop { Send {Alt down}{Tab down}{Alt up}{Tab up} Sleep 6 ; wait 60 seconds } You may have to switch off 'Tab through re

Re: NOC display software

On 13 February 2013 15:19, JoeSox wrote: > Just wondering if anyone can recommend Windows software (it could be > Linux too but I might need to create a separate host for that > configuration) > that enables rotating [on one monitor] several webpages (dashboards) > or windows (application dashboar

NOC display software

Just wondering if anyone can recommend Windows software (it could be Linux too but I might need to create a separate host for that configuration) that enables rotating [on one monitor] several webpages (dashboards) or windows (application dashboards). It would be nice if it was freeware or open sou

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

On 13 February 2013 12:34, Scott Helms wrote: > Using the UK as a model for US and Canadian deployments is a fallacy. I don't believe anyone was looking at the UK model? But now that you mention it the UK has a rather interesting model for fibre deployment, a significant portion of the country ha

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

Scott Helms wrote: > Masataka, > > Using the UK as a model for US and Canadian deployments is a fallacy. May or may not be. But, what "Using the UK as a model for US and Canadian deployments"!? I'm afraid it's not me but you to have done so. So? Who are you arguing against? > Yo

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

Warren Bailey wrote: > No one wants to deal with an > arrogant prick, especially one who says someone "lost" because your > opinion seems to be more valid to yourself. Figures in http://www.soumu.go.jp/main_sosiki/joho_tsusin/policyreports/chousa/bb_seibi/pdf/041209_2_14.pdf is not my opinion b

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

Masataka, Using the UK as a model for US and Canadian deployments is a fallacy. The population density there is 673 per square mile, much closer to Japan's (873 per sq mile) than either the US (89 per sq mile) or Canada (10 per sq mile). The UK also has a legal monopoly for telephone infrastruct

RE: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network

> Multicast is dead. Feel free to disagree. :-) > > Tim:> > Multicast will never be dead. With ever raising bandwidth needs we'll always welcome a distribution method that allows us to pass the same data least times over the least number of links. We all remember the spikes in BW demands when th

Re: IPv6 support by wifi systems

On Feb 12, 2013, at 7:32 PM, Karl Auer wrote: > On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 16:29 -0500, Brandon Ross wrote: >> It seems that, then, >> MLD snooping is valuable as it will prevent DAD and other ND traffic from >> using bandwidth towards hosts not in that group. > > It will prevent *all* multicast t