On (2012-12-20 03:24 +), Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> I actually was doing research on this today as well. Anyone have any
> experience with the solutions that implement VLAN management as well like
> Gestioip?
I'm not remotely interested in externally developed software for this
problem. But i
I actually was doing research on this today as well. Anyone have any
experience with the solutions that implement VLAN management as well like
Gestioip?
-Original Message-
From: Beavis [mailto:pfu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 8:10 PM
To: Aftab Siddiqui
Cc: NANOG Ope
+1 for ipplan http://iptrack.sourceforge.net/
-Ed
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Aftab Siddiqui
wrote:
> Kindly search the archives for many threads on the same subject, which
> should be the normal practice.
>
> nevertheless, IPPlan, PHPIP, PHPIPAM are good enough as per the need. The
> first
I'll have to check tonight when I get my next window to play with it.
-Original Message-
From: Job Snijders [mailto:j...@instituut.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:40 PM
To: Joe Freeman
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Need a Yahoo network contact
On Dec 19, 2012, at 8:46 PM, Jo
On Dec 19, 2012, at 8:46 PM, Joe Freeman wrote:
> I need a Yahoo contact if anyone is available.
> I'm having issues with customers on 186.65.92.0/22 (ASN52379) out of Costa
> Rica being able to reach Yahoo sites (www.yahoo.com/www.flickr.com) with
> their web browsers, but they can ping them j
I need a Yahoo contact if anyone is available.
I'm having issues with customers on 186.65.92.0/22 (ASN52379) out of Costa Rica
being able to reach Yahoo sites (www.yahoo.com/www.flickr.com) with their web
browsers, but they can ping them just fine.
Thanks-
joe
___
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, J. Oquendo wrote:
>
> Can someone from GOOG contact me off-list. After many
> submissions to have my corp IP space fixed for geolocation,
> I'm at wits end looking at British news, finding British
> searches, knowing more about the UK then the US than I care
> to. Makes for
On Dec 19, 2012, at 3:59 AM, Christopher J. Pilkington wrote:
> I'm looking for a simple tool to verify PMTUD is usable along a
> particular path. Ideally this tool would be cross-platform, or run on
> Linux or Windows.
>
> I've done some testing of my own by hand, but hoping a tool would help
You can look at the final outcome yourself (no password needed), at
http://www.itu.int/en/wcit-12/Documents/final-acts-wcit-12.pdf
RESOLUTION PLEN/5 on page 27 (by PDF count, out of 30 pages) describes
work to be done by Study Group 3 and cooperating members. Note that the
resolution is not pa
Can someone from GOOG contact me off-list. After many
submissions to have my corp IP space fixed for geolocation,
I'm at wits end looking at British news, finding British
searches, knowing more about the UK then the US than I care
to. Makes for difficult GHDB'ing when searching as well.
=+=+=+=
Watch out for licensing gotchyas.
In active/active ClusterXL situations (load sharing multicast mode) be
careful of multicast--make sure any traversed switches and routers are
compatible with Ethernet Multicast (make sure they don't partition ports
due to high broadcast traffic). Active/Active cl
Howdy,
I am just getting into an environment with a large Check Point
deployment and I am looking for a little bit of feedback from other real world
admins. Looking for what people like, what people don't (why hopefully). Also
for those of you who might run Check Point devices
> ... until the bad frame reached the first store-and-forward switch (or most
> any router) which would log the FCS error, correct?
Log and drop yes. cut-through would log it also, but it would be too late
to drop it.
--
++ytti
On 19/12/2012 15:17, Tony Finch wrote:
> Nick Hilliard wrote:
>> On 19/12/2012 14:25, Tony Finch wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you have any citations for that? I thought they had given up on trying
>>> to interfere with Internet peering and settlement.
>>
>> http://www.itu.int/net/ITU-T/lists/questions.aspx?G
Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 19/12/2012 14:25, Tony Finch wrote:
> >
> > Do you have any citations for that? I thought they had given up on trying
> > to interfere with Internet peering and settlement.
>
> http://www.itu.int/net/ITU-T/lists/questions.aspx?Group=03&Period=15
Looks vaguely ominous. Do
On 19/12/2012 14:25, Tony Finch wrote:
> Do you have any citations for that? I thought they had given up on trying
> to interfere with Internet peering and settlement.
http://www.itu.int/net/ITU-T/lists/questions.aspx?Group=03&Period=15
ETNO is very keen on introducing sending-party-pays, and rec
On 2012-12-19, at 10:02 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2012-12-19 09:53 -0500), Jason Lixfeld wrote:
>
>> Perhaps in simpler terms, a CRC error is a localized thing and would
>> never be forwarded from one device to another.
>
> It would be forwarded in cut-through switching.
... until the bad fr
On (2012-12-19 09:53 -0500), Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> Perhaps in simpler terms, a CRC error is a localized thing and would
> never be forwarded from one device to another.
It would be forwarded in cut-through switching.
--
++ytti
Hi all,
I'm trying to confirm (or debunk) my current understanding of FCS errors. An
FCS error is a layer 2 error. In Ethernet spake, the 4 bytes of FCS data
within each Ethernet frame is validated by a CRC check, which is done by the
device receiving said frame. If the CRC check fails, an
Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
> The main unfortunate outcome is that the ITU has managed to get Study
> Group 3 approved to try to figure out how to override peering agreements
> with government-imposed settlements.
Do you have any citations for that? I thought they had given up on trying
to interfere w
Hi,
On Dec 18, 2012, at 7:59 PM, Christopher J. Pilkington wrote:
> I'm looking for a simple tool to verify PMTUD is usable along a
> particular path. Ideally this tool would be cross-platform, or run on
> Linux or Windows.
>
> I've done some testing of my own by hand, but hoping a tool would h
21 matches
Mail list logo
