Is this a song by Engelbert Humperdinck?
j
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:20 PM, flower tailor wrote:
> Delete me
>
>
--
---
Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
http://pinstand.com - http://pun
// wire pin 10 to +5v
void setup() {
pinMode(10, OUTPUT);
digitalWrite(10, LOW);
}
void loop() {
// ha ha you'll never get here, enjoy the blue smoke
}
// I like to classify my occupation as "gaff taping Arduino boards to
things till they 'work'"
Tom Morris, KG4CYX
Chairman, South Florida Tropic
dd if=/dev/null of=/
-Original Message-
From: Joe Hamelin [mailto:j...@nethead.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 7:42 PM
To: sur...@mauigateway.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re:
nanog:/root#rmuser
Please enter one or more usernames: flower_tailor Matching password entry:
flower_t
nanog:/root#rmuser
Please enter one or more usernames: flower_tailor
Matching password entry:
flower_tailor:*:13204:13204::0:0:User &:/home/flower_tailor:/bin/tcsh
Is this the entry you wish to remove? y
Remove user's home directory (/home/flower_tailor)? y
Removing user (flower_tailor): mailspoo
Chuck,
If you look at the communities on 68.115.27.0/24 you will see 7018:5000. That
community means AS209 is a AT&T peering partner.
> route-server>sh ip bgp 68.115.217.201
> BGP routing table entry for 68.115.217.0/24, version 13683280
> Paths: (18 available, best #7, table Default-IP-Routi
--- samba...@hotmail.com wrote:
From: flower tailor
Delete me
--
cisco-router> conf t
cisco-router(config)# banner ^c look at the email header to get off mailing
lists like NANOG ^c
cisco-router(config)# ^Z
cisco-router# wr mem
cisco-router# exit
>;-)
^H
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Mike wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 04:20 PM, flower tailor wrote:
>
>> Delete me
>>
>>
>
>
> You are deleted.
>
>
>
On 12/11/2012 04:20 PM, flower tailor wrote:
Delete me
You are deleted.
Delete me
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Eric Krichbaum wrote:
>> Absolutely. I'd rather see it done responsibly. It's hard to get rid of
>> bad data/incorrect data/stale data and it shouldn't be. If done properly,
>> it would be much frie
>
> Anyone,
>
>
>
>Hopefully this is a simple question about RADB. I'm
> supporting a small wireless ISP, they just recently added a second upstream
> connection - Charter (AS 20115). The IP space was originally issued by the
> other upstream Windstream (AS 7029). Looking at
Hello.
We are seeing approx. 3% - 10% packet loss between a fixed address on the
Cogent network and services on the Comcast network in the SF Bay Area.
Are we alone in this?
Andrew Stern, CBNT | Broadcast IT Engineer
Cumulus Media San Francisco
KFOG | KNBR | KSAN | KTCT | KGO | KSFO
__
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Chuck Church wrote:
> -Original Message-
>>From: Eric Krichbaum [mailto:e...@telic.us]
>>Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 8:31 AM
>>To: 'Chuck Church'; nanog@nanog.org
>>Subject: RE: RADB entry
>
>>While not 100% accurate, it is very common. The origin be
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Eric Krichbaum wrote:
> Absolutely. I'd rather see it done responsibly. It's hard to get rid of
> bad data/incorrect data/stale data and it shouldn't be. If done properly,
> it would be much friendlier. There is incentive for people to put data in
> but not to
-Original Message-
>From: Eric Krichbaum [mailto:e...@telic.us]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 8:31 AM
>To: 'Chuck Church'; nanog@nanog.org
>Subject: RE: RADB entry
>While not 100% accurate, it is very common. The origin being entered by a
provider as their own allows them to add the
Absolutely. I'd rather see it done responsibly. It's hard to get rid of
bad data/incorrect data/stale data and it shouldn't be. If done properly,
it would be much friendlier. There is incentive for people to put data in
but not to remove the other.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: christ
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Eric Krichbaum wrote:
> The origin being entered by a
> provider as their own allows them to add the prefix (and have it accepted by
> anyone who filters them by prefix generated) without being forced to add a
> downstream (and downstream's downstreams) AS to thei
While not 100% accurate, it is very common. The origin being entered by a
provider as their own allows them to add the prefix (and have it accepted by
anyone who filters them by prefix generated) without being forced to add a
downstream (and downstream's downstreams) AS to their AS-SET. In genera
Anyone,
Hopefully this is a simple question about RADB. I'm
supporting a small wireless ISP, they just recently added a second upstream
connection - Charter (AS 20115). The IP space was originally issued by the
other upstream Windstream (AS 7029). Looking at a few resources s
On Dec 10, 2012, at 8:35 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 12/10/2012 03:14 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 10, 2012, at 2:04 PM, Doug Barton
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/10/2012 01:27 PM, Schiller, Heather A wrote:
I think most folks would agree that, IPv4 /32 :: IPv6 /128 as
IPv4 /29 :: I
On Dec 10, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> On 8 December 2012 23:10, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>> Frankly, the more I think about this, the less it's clear why someone
>>> like hetzner.de would actually want you to be using their native IPv6
>>> support, instead of the one provided
On Dec 10, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <272782d1-8dea-4718-9429-8b0505dd3...@delong.com>, Owen DeLong
> write
> s:
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Dec 10, 2012, at 3:02 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>>> =20
>>> In message <50c65c84.6080...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Ba
22 matches
Mail list logo
