On 8 December 2012 16:12, Dan Luedtke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> hmm, they get away with it once again. On the other hand their prices
> stay low.
>
> Off-topic but somehow important to me:
>> HE has an open-peering policy (AFAIK);
>> which basically means that tunnelbroker.net traffic is free for
>> hetzne
> Frankly, the more I think about this, the less it's clear why someone
> like hetzner.de would actually want you to be using their native IPv6
> support, instead of the one provided by HE.net through their free
> tunnelbroker.net service. HE has an open-peering policy (AFAIK);
Yes, HE has a one-
Hi,
Just wondering if there was anyone around that might know what is up
with Charter Internet in South Eastern Washington State (Walla Walla /
Tri-Cities). Could even be a larger area that is effected. As usual the
normal support doesn't really know anything. On the plus side the lady I
got
On Dec 08, 2012, at 21:14 , Darius Jahandarie wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Dan Luedtke wrote:
>> Off-topic but somehow important to me:
>>> HE has an open-peering policy (AFAIK);
>>> which basically means that tunnelbroker.net traffic is free for
>>> hetzner.de
>>
>> Is that true?
>
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Dan Luedtke wrote:
> Off-topic but somehow important to me:
>> HE has an open-peering policy (AFAIK);
>> which basically means that tunnelbroker.net traffic is free for
>> hetzner.de
>
> Is that true?
> That would be great!
Just because companies A and B don't have
Hi,
hmm, they get away with it once again. On the other hand their prices
stay low.
Off-topic but somehow important to me:
> HE has an open-peering policy (AFAIK);
> which basically means that tunnelbroker.net traffic is free for
> hetzner.de
Is that true?
That would be great!
Regards
Dan
On 8 December 2012 13:03, Mark Andrews wrote:
> It's also more than likely a hold over of IPv4 think where, generally,
> only companies are allocated address blocks. I would be ringing
> the ISP and talking to the staff escalating until you get to someone
> who understands the issue. Also a /64
In message
,
Jimmy Hess writes:
> On 12/7/12, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> [snip]
>
> It seems you have an issue with the automated system of one provider
> in your RIR service region.This is unusual, I think; for the
> provider to not ask what NIC handle, or WHOIS detail should
8 matches
Mail list logo
