Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only

2012-10-10 Thread bmanning
https://intelligence.businessinsider.com/facebook-is-adding-over-25000-mobile-users-an-hour-2012-10 dream big /bill On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:31:44AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: > * Cameron Byrne > > > FYI http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r27324698-LTE-access-early- > > > > So much for ne

Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only

2012-10-10 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Tore Anderson wrote: So. With a green-field deployment, in their home market (supposed to be the first of their tree-digit million subscribers world-wide to get all the cool new tech), built on 3GPP specs that fully supports IPv6, already proven to work by other pioneers (

Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only

2012-10-10 Thread Tore Anderson
* Cameron Byrne > FYI http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r27324698-LTE-access-early- > > So much for next generation technology ... Yesterday, Telenor launched LTE. So. With a green-field deployment, in their home market (supposed to be the first of their tree-digit million subscribers world-wide

Re: Wired access to SMS?

2012-10-10 Thread Joly MacFie
More precisely http://www.twilio.com/sms j On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Tim M Edwards wrote: > Twillio.com > > On Oct 9, 2012, at 12:36 PM, William Herrin wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > > > I'm looking for a way to do wireline access to send and receive > > cellular phone short message service

Re: Typical additional latency for CGN?

2012-10-10 Thread Owen DeLong
On Oct 10, 2012, at 3:30 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message , Jon Lewis > writ > es: >> I just spent a few minutes looking into this again, and figured out the >> problem. AT&T has apparently changed the way their CGN works. I use a >> form of port knocking to restrict access to SSHd f

Re: Typical additional latency for CGN?

2012-10-10 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Jon Lewis writ es: > I just spent a few minutes looking into this again, and figured out the > problem. AT&T has apparently changed the way their CGN works. I use a > form of port knocking to restrict access to SSHd from "foreign" networks. > It used to work fine from my phone.

Re: Wired access to SMS?

2012-10-10 Thread Deepak Jain
On 10/10/2012 5:34 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote: You could also hitch up an analog modem to a POTS line, and then let your paging software dial your cell/home number. You won't hear anything, but the CallerID will let you know that your monitoring system is *desperately* trying to get in touch

RE: Wired access to SMS?

2012-10-10 Thread Nathan Eisenberg
> You could also hitch up an analog modem to a POTS line, and then let your > paging software dial your cell/home number. > You won't hear anything, but the CallerID will let you know that your > monitoring system is *desperately* trying to get in touch :-) You could take it one step further an

Re: Wired access to SMS?

2012-10-10 Thread Richard Brown
On Oct 10, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Bill Herrin wrote: > What about finding someplace offsite and setting up a persistent PPP > connection with modems (of the POTS variety) between it and home base? > Put half the modems there and maybe a low power Atom server with hooks > to send alerts like "connectio

Re: Wired access to SMS?

2012-10-10 Thread Mike Lyon
Inmarsat SMS? http://www.marlink.com/text-messaging.html -Mike On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:41 AM, William Herrin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: > > On 10/10/12 10:10 AM, William Herrin wrote: > >> So, I need to replace it with something that offers high availab

Re: Wired access to SMS?

2012-10-10 Thread William Herrin
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: > On 10/10/12 10:10 AM, William Herrin wrote: >> So, I need to replace it with something that offers high availability >> for each phone number, aka "SMS long code." I realize that the phone >> end will still suffer all the vagaries of SMS. But

Re: Wired access to SMS?

2012-10-10 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 10/10/12 10:10 AM, William Herrin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:18 PM, jamie rishaw wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Aaron Toponce >>> Instead, purchase a cellular USB modem with a standard plan. All 4 major >>> carriers provide APIs to interact with the modems, and you get every

Re: Wired access to SMS?

2012-10-10 Thread William Herrin
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:18 PM, jamie rishaw wrote: > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Aaron Toponce >> Instead, purchase a cellular USB modem with a standard plan. All 4 major >> carriers provide APIs to interact with the modems, and you get everything >> you need*. They aren't cheap (something

Re: Wired access to SMS?

2012-10-10 Thread jamie rishaw
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Aaron Toponce @ gmail.com > wrote: > > Instead, purchase a cellular USB modem with a standard plan. All 4 major > carriers provide APIs to interact with the modems, and you get everything > you need*. They aren't cheap (something in the neighborhood of $30/month), *

RE: MPLS on 6500 VSS

2012-10-10 Thread Otis L. Surratt, Jr.
Have you searched the c-nsp list? You might have better luck there IMO. http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp (if not a member) https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ (archives) I would look there first. There seems to be some discussion also on http://supportforums.cisco.com a

Re: MPLS on 6500 VSS

2012-10-10 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 10/10/2012 14:46, Dikkema, Michael (Business Technology) wrote: > I'm looking at deploying MPLS and MPLS VPN on a number of 6500 VSS > (VS-S720) systems. Was wondering if there were any major issues to look > out for specific to this platform. There may be several issues to look out for, depend

MPLS on 6500 VSS

2012-10-10 Thread Dikkema, Michael (Business Technology)
Hi, all. I'm looking at deploying MPLS and MPLS VPN on a number of 6500 VSS (VS-S720) systems. Was wondering if there were any major issues to look out for specific to this platform. Thanks.

Re: Typical additional latency for CGN?

2012-10-10 Thread Jon Lewis
I just spent a few minutes looking into this again, and figured out the problem. AT&T has apparently changed the way their CGN works. I use a form of port knocking to restrict access to SSHd from "foreign" networks. It used to work fine from my phone. Now, the port knocking request from the

Re: Typical additional latency for CGN?

2012-10-10 Thread Owen DeLong
The day before I left the US, it was still working on my iPad. Owen On Oct 8, 2012, at 5:20 AM, Jon Sands wrote: > On 10/7/2012 9:22 PM, Jon Lewis wrote: >> has anyone else noticed AT&T mobile is blocking ssh (outgoing 22/tcp) >> connections? > > Not here, have an SSH session open on my phone

Re: Wired access to SMS?

2012-10-10 Thread Bryan Tong
Arent most of the services now wrapped into Google for Business where you are the customer? I dont know about Google voice though. Thanks On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:47 PM, William Herrin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:05 PM, steve pirk [egrep] wrote: >> Have you looked at Google Voice much? I

Re: Typical additional latency for CGN?

2012-10-10 Thread Jon Sands
On 10/7/2012 9:22 PM, Jon Lewis wrote: has anyone else noticed AT&T mobile is blocking ssh (outgoing 22/tcp) connections? Not here, have an SSH session open on my phone on port 22 as we speak. I'm on an android on ATT's 3G network in central indiana, if that matters. -- Jon Sands Fohdeesha M

Re: Typical additional latency for CGN?

2012-10-10 Thread Andre Tomt
On 08. okt. 2012 11:27, Daniel Roesen wrote: On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 03:18:56PM -0700, Cameron Byrne wrote: On Oct 7, 2012 1:48 PM, "Tom Limoncelli" wrote: Have there been studies on how much latency CGN adds to a typical internet user? I'd also be interested in anecdotes. Anecdote. Sub-