I would suggest that multiple models be pursued (since each appears to have
a champion) and that the market/drafting process will resolve the issue of
which is better (which is okay by me: widespread adoption of any of the
proposed models would advance the state of the norm; progress beats the
sno
On 06/23/2012 05:52 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
Leo,
This will never work. The "vested profiteers" will all get together and make it a condition that
in order to use this method the user has to have "purchased" a "verified" key from them.
Every site will use different profiteers (probably whoev
> 2. Pre-compromised-at-the-factory smartphones and similar. There's
> no reason why these can't be preloaded with spyware similar to CarrierIQ
> and directed to upload all newly-created private keys to a central
> collection point. This can be done, therefore it will be done, and when
> some se
Leo,
This will never work. The "vested profiteers" will all get together and make
it a condition that in order to use this method the user has to have
"purchased" a "verified" key from them. Every site will use different
profiteers (probably whoever gives them the biggest kickback). You will
As suspected, this ended up being an XO/DTAG peering issue. Took a
long time to get sorted out, but thanks to any and all who assisted!
Tim:>
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Tim Durack wrote:
> Trying to troubleshoot packet loss from NYC to DEU. Traceroute shows:
>
> tdurack@2ua82715mg:~$ trace
I have always had excellent response if you open up a ticket with their
helpdesk. Cogent helpdesk has solved some rather complex issues so I would
try there first.
Justin
--
Justin Wilson
Aol & Yahoo IM: j2sw
http://www.mtin.net/blog xISP News
http://www.twitter.com/j2sw Follow me on Twitter
Hi All,
If anyone has a contact at Cogent, who might be able to solve a reverse DNS
issue, could they contact me offline?
Thanks!
Garret
7 matches
Mail list logo
