On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Unlike IPv4 with natural boundary of /24, routing table
explosion of IPv6 is a serious scalability problem.
I really don't see where you're getting that from. The biggest consumers
of IPv4 space in the US tended to get initial IPv6 blocks from ARIN t
(2012/06/23 10:35), TJ wrote:
> Rate of deployment is more inclusive than just the 'center', that would be
> my guess.
But, the context, as you can see, is this:
:> Even though it may be easy to make end systems and local
:> LANs v6 capable, rest, the center part, of the Internet
:> keep causing
On 06/22/2012 08:35 PM, TJ wrote:
The center part of the internet is the easiest part of
modification for IPv6 and is probably somewhere near 99%
complete at this point.
What do you mean something 99% complete is rapidly accelerating?
Is it a theory for time traveling?
Rate of deployment is mo
> >>> The center part of the internet is the easiest part of
> >>> modification for IPv6 and is probably somewhere near 99%
> >>> complete at this point.
>
> What do you mean something 99% complete is rapidly accelerating?
>
> Is it a theory for time traveling?
Rate of deployment is more inclusive
On Jun 22, 2012, at 6:15 PM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>>> Even though it may be easy to make end systems and local
>>> LANs v6 capable, rest, the center part, of the Internet
>>> keep causing problems.
>
>> Those problems are getting solved more and more every day.
>>
>> The
Owen DeLong wrote:
>> Even though it may be easy to make end systems and local
>> LANs v6 capable, rest, the center part, of the Internet
>> keep causing problems.
> Those problems are getting solved more and more every day.
>
> The rate of IPv6 deployment is rapidly accelerating at this point.
>
> Even though it may be easy to make end systems and local
> LANs v6 capable, rest, the center part, of the Internet
> keep causing problems.
>
> Masataka Ohta
Those problems are getting solved more and more every day.
The rate of IPv6 deployment
TJ wrote:
>>> The center part of the internet is the easiest part of
>>> modification for IPv6 and is probably somewhere near 99%
>>> complete at this point.
> Am I saying we are all done, and that IPv6 is fully deployed? Of course
> not, lots of work to do in the enterprise and last-mile areas
This report has been generated at Fri Jun 22 21:12:58 2012 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 14-Jun-12 -to- 21-Jun-12 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS8452 113559 4.4% 62.4 -- TE-AS TE-AS
2 - AS982950283 2.0% 38.7 -- B
The IETF pim working group is conducting a survey in order to advance
the PIM Sparse Mode spec on the IETF Standards Track, and would like
input from operators. The survey ends July 20th. Please see below for
more information.
thank you,
pim chairs Mike & Stig
Introduction:
PIM-SM was first pu
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.ap
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Masataka Ohta <
mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
> > The center part of the internet is the easiest part of
> > modification for IPv6 and is probably somewhere near 99%
> > complete at this point.
>
> That is a fairy tale once believed by so many infants
Still playing devils advocate here, but does this still not resolve the
human factor of "Implementation"?
--
- Robert Miller
(arch3angel)
On 6/22/12 7:43 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:43:44PM -0700, Leo Bicknell wrote:
(on the use of public/privat
+1 - Took the letters right out from under my fingers :-)
--
- Robert Miller
(arch3angel)
On 6/22/12 4:44 AM, Barry Greene wrote:
Shadowserver.org has a public benefit notification service.
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 22, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Yang Xiang
wrote:
Argus can alert prefix hijacking,
In a message written on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 04:48:47PM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
> there are no trustable third parties
With a lot of transactions the second party isn't trustable, and
sometimes the first party isn't as well. :)
In a message written on Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:53:18PM -0400, Chris
I used the example I did based on YubiKey, I own one and use it on a
regular basis. The real issue I am trying to make is the fact that even
in the scenario I placed forward it still requires trust. Trust of a
person or trust of a company. This reminds me of a quote:
Onl
Owen DeLong wrote privately to me, but as I think I need
public responses, I'm Ccing to nanog fairly quoting part
of his response:
>> Moreover, it is easy to have a transport protocol with
>> 32bit or 48bit port numbers with the end to end fashion
>> only by modifying end part of the Internet.
>
Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:43:44PM -0700, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> (on the use of public/private keys)
>
> > The leaks stop immediately. There's almost no value in a database of
> > public keys, heck if you want one go download a PGP keyring now.
>
> It's a nice thought,
Shadowserver.org has a public benefit notification service.
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 22, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Yang Xiang
wrote:
> Argus can alert prefix hijacking, in realtime.
> http://tli.tl/argus
> Hope to be useful to you.
>
> BR.
>
> 在 2012年6月22日星期五，Ganbold Tsagaankhuu 写道：
>
>> Hi,
>>
>
Hi,
Kindly would someone from Global Crossing contact me offlist.
Regards,
Righa Shake
21 matches
Mail list logo
