RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow

2012-02-14 Thread Blake Pfankuch
I would be happy if it was Juniper or Cisco ish. Right now it's just total crap :) From: brandon.j@live.com [mailto:brandon.j@live.com] On Behalf Of Brandon Kim Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:14 AM To: leigh.por...@ukbroadband.com; Blake Pfankuch; j...@miscreant.org; j...@baylink.c

Re: Clued contact at Brighthouse

2012-02-14 Thread James Milko
Thanks to everyone who contacted us off list. We got in touch with the correct people over at Brighthouse and are working on it now. Thanks, James Milko Senior Network Engineer www.inetwork.com 4001 Weston Parkway Cary, NC 27513 inetwork is a division of Bandwidth On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:32

Clued contact at Brighthouse

2012-02-14 Thread James Milko
Brighthouse seems to be announcing one of our prefixes. Does anyone have a contact for them that doesn't end up in residential support? Thanks, James Milko Senior Network Engineer www.inetwork.com 4001 Weston Parkway Cary, NC 27513 inetwork is a division of Bandwidth

Does anyone know anything about intelishift.com?

2012-02-14 Thread Landon Stewart
Does anyone know if intelishift.com has a reputation that is good or bad? I have never heard of them before but need to know some more about them. If you have anything to share please let me know off-list. We are seeing some unscrupulous behaviour from them regarding marketing and spam. --- Lan

RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow

2012-02-14 Thread Brandon Kim
Never messed around with Juniper > From: leigh.por...@ukbroadband.com > To: brandon@brandontek.com; bl...@pfankuch.me; j...@miscreant.org; > j...@baylink.com > CC: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow > Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:53:43 + > > > > > -Original

RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow

2012-02-14 Thread Leigh Porter
> -Original Message- > From: Brandon Kim [mailto:brandon@brandontek.com] > Sent: 14 February 2012 15:51 > To: bl...@pfankuch.me; j...@miscreant.org; j...@baylink.com > Cc: nanog group > Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow > > > I've been using 5.8 with no problems thus far. As for t

RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow

2012-02-14 Thread Brandon Kim
I've been using 5.8 with no problems thus far. As for the CLI, yes it is CLUNKY. But they are completely revamping it, it will be very similar to Cisco in the near future... > From: bl...@pfankuch.me > To: j...@miscreant.org; j...@baylink.com > Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow > Date: Tue

RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow

2012-02-14 Thread Blake Pfankuch
JRA, If you have questions contact me off list. I would shoot for a little higher device to support that bandwidth if you are going to be enabling Services at all. Also if you use services, make sure they are enabled only on 1 zone as to not double scan traffic. Also I would skip the

Re: Sonicwall 3500/netflow

2012-02-14 Thread Jay Mitchell
According to the spec sheet it does, haven't had the opportunity to play with one to comment any further though. http://www.sonicwall.com/us/products/NSA_3500.html#tab=specifications --jay On 14/02/2012, at 2:21 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > This will be my first time in Sonicwall territory. I'