Re: ANNOUNCE: bgptables.merit.edu - understanding visibility of your prefix/AS

2012-01-18 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Robert Kisteleki wrote: > One can also try RIPEstat for this: http://stat.ripe.net/ > > Amongst other modules it gives full (~10 year) BGP history for prefixes. Does it also give a similar history for ASN announcements?I see a lot many shady ASNs that simply m

Re: World IPv6 Launch Day - June 6, 2012

2012-01-18 Thread Joel Jaeggli
By the same token, The mobile broadband network is not some also-ran adjunct to the residential broadband service. On Jan 18, 2012, at 16:45, "Justin M. Streiner" wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Joel jaeggli wrote: > >> On 1/18/12 15:56 , Justin M. Streiner wrote: >>> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Chris

Re: World IPv6 Launch Day - June 6, 2012

2012-01-18 Thread Antonio Querubin
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Anurag Bhatia wrote: 1. No A or record on main worldipv6launch.org Odd and annoying. So 20th century... :) Antonio Querubin e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com

Re: Tata AS6453 not peering with NTT AS2914 in Japan

2012-01-18 Thread Matthew Petach
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote: > Call it funny or what - so far I have got 4 replies and in total 10emails > in one to one discussion. > > No one replied in mailing list! People are often hesitant to discuss dirty laundry in public; not least because it can sometimes have

Re: World IPv6 Launch Day - June 6, 2012

2012-01-18 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Joel jaeggli wrote: On 1/18/12 15:56 , Justin M. Streiner wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Christopher Morrow wrote: I wonder when Comcast and Verizon will get into an IPv6 advertising war. "v6... smhee-6! Ditch that cable modem and switch to Fios!" LTE has V6 natively and i

Re: bgp question

2012-01-18 Thread Jonathan Lassoff
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Deric Kwok wrote: > ls it supporting equally multipath in different bgp connections? Most software routing protocols have support for this in their RIBs, but the actual forwarding ability of the underlying kernel will determine the support for this. What platform

Re: World IPv6 Launch Day - June 6, 2012

2012-01-18 Thread Joel jaeggli
On 1/18/12 15:56 , Justin M. Streiner wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Christopher Morrow wrote: > >> My question is when is FiOS going to get v6 natively? could we get the >> engineers there to actually do something as opposed to trials of >> non-production systems that'll never actually get deploye

Re: World IPv6 Launch Day - June 6, 2012

2012-01-18 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Christopher Morrow wrote: My question is when is FiOS going to get v6 natively? could we get the engineers there to actually do something as opposed to trials of non-production systems that'll never actually get deployed? :) I wonder when Comcast and Verizon will get into

Re: bgp question

2012-01-18 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Deric Kwok wrote: Could you tell me more about "routing registries"? I would like to learn it In a nutshell, Internet Routing Registries (IRRs) are places where networks can store information that describes their routing policies. Other networks can query this informatio

Re: ANNOUNCE: bgptables.merit.edu - understanding visibility of your prefix/AS

2012-01-18 Thread Randy Bush
> One can also try RIPEstat for this: http://stat.ripe.net/ wfm > (Disclaimer: our team is working on this tool.) and you used your work email address. thank you. randy

Re: bgp question

2012-01-18 Thread Jo Rhett
On Jan 18, 2012, at 5:58 AM, Deric Kwok wrote: > Could you tell me more about "routing registries"? > I would like to learn it google it, and RADB for example. > 2nd questions? Are you familiar to quagga? > ls it supporting equally multipath in different bgp connections? Yes, absolutely. -- J

Re: Tata AS6453 not peering with NTT AS2914 in Japan

2012-01-18 Thread Anurag Bhatia
Call it funny or what - so far I have got 4 replies and in total 10emails in one to one discussion. No one replied in mailing list! On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Anurag Bhatia wrote: > Hello everyone! > > Was wondering is there's anyone from Tata Communications (VSNL/TeleGlobe) > or NTT Comm

Tata AS6453 not peering with NTT AS2914 in Japan

2012-01-18 Thread Anurag Bhatia
Hello everyone! Was wondering is there's anyone from Tata Communications (VSNL/TeleGlobe) or NTT Communications? I can see Tata Comm's AS6453 is not exchanging traffic with NTT AS2914 in Japan. Is there's any specific reason for that? I can see traffic exchange is being done at London, New York, S

RE: DNS Attacks

2012-01-18 Thread Drew Weaver
-Original Message- From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.li...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:43 AM To: Steven Bellovin Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: DNS Attacks yup... I think roland and nick (he can correct me, roland I KNOW is saying this) are basically saying

Re: VPC=S/MLT?

2012-01-18 Thread -Hammer-
Nice link. Thanks Joshua. -Hammer- "I was a normal American nerd" -Jack Herer On 1/18/2012 11:57 AM, joshua sahala wrote: vpc has a long list of unclear and/or seemingly contradictory caveats (spread across multiple cisco docs/webpages). when it doesn't work (as expected), it can be challen

Re: VPC=S/MLT?

2012-01-18 Thread -Hammer-
Found them all on the same page. Not exactly what I was looking for but it's worth sharing. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps9670/products_implementation_design_guides_list.html -Hammer- "I was a normal American nerd" -Jack Herer On 1/14/2012 7:10 PM, Charles Spurgeon wrote: On Fri, J

Re: enterprise 802.11

2012-01-18 Thread Robert E. Seastrom
Jay Ashworth writes: > - Original Message - >> From: "Jared Mauch" > >> network side. I'm personally not convinced of the value of very short >> lease times (less than an hour) > > Less than an hour, perhaps not. > > On small residential networks, though -- generally, anything where th

Re: VPC=S/MLT?

2012-01-18 Thread joshua sahala
vpc has a long list of unclear and/or seemingly contradictory caveats (spread across multiple cisco docs/webpages). when it doesn't work (as expected), it can be challenging to find someone with tac who can actually tell you why (or how to fix it properly). if your needs are fairly basic, are all

Re: World IPv6 Launch Day - June 6, 2012

2012-01-18 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote: > Hi Fred > > You can access on www.worldipv6launch.org but not > http://worldipv6launch.org (without > www) > > not everyone puts their web content on their domain? nothing to see here, please drive through...

Re: World IPv6 Launch Day - June 6, 2012

2012-01-18 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: >> >> My question is when is FiOS going to get v6 natively? could we get the >> engineers there to actually do something as opposed to trials of >> non-production systems that'll never actually get deployed? :) >> > > My understanding is that s

Re: World IPv6 Launch Day - June 6, 2012

2012-01-18 Thread Anurag Bhatia
Hi Fred You can access on www.worldipv6launch.org but not http://worldipv6launch.org (without www) It's available on IPv6 on www since Akami node has and seems fine. anurag@laptop:~$ dig www.worldipv6launch.org +short www.worldipv6launch.org.edgesuite.net. a1448.dscb.akamai.net. 2600:1

Re: World IPv6 Launch Day - June 6, 2012

2012-01-18 Thread Fred Baker
On Jan 18, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Shumon Huque wrote: > But, checking www.worldipv6launch.org just now shows that it > have IPv6 records now: I just successfully accessed it using IPv6. The service is real, not just the DNS record. The address I accessed it at was 2600:809:600::3f50:411.

Re: DNS Attacks

2012-01-18 Thread Cameron Byrne
On Jan 18, 2012 8:43 AM, "Christopher Morrow" wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote: > > > > On Jan 18, 2012, at 10:41 30AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > >>> On 18/01/2012 14:18, Leigh Porter wrote: > >>>

Re: World IPv6 Launch Day - June 6, 2012

2012-01-18 Thread Anurag Bhatia
Btw did someone noticed DNS setup of project site is really crazy! anurag@laptop:~$ ping worldipv6launch.org ping: unknown host worldipv6launch.org anurag@laptop:~$ dig worldipv6launch.org ns +short ns5.he.net. ns4.he.net. ns2.he.net. ns3.he.net. anurag@laptop:~$ dig worldipv6launch.org soa +short

Re: World IPv6 Launch Day - June 6, 2012

2012-01-18 Thread Owen DeLong
On Jan 18, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Shumon Huque wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:17:40PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote: >>> Another very sad thing about it: >>> >>> delong-dhcp202:owen (9) ~ % host www.worldipv6launch.org

Re: World IPv6 Launch Day - June 6, 2012

2012-01-18 Thread Shumon Huque
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:46:24AM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Shumon Huque wrote: > > > > I heard that it initially had records. After the site > > couldn't keep up with the initial load, it was migrated to > > Akamai's CDN (the DNS records you see no

Re: accessing multiple devices via a script

2012-01-18 Thread chip
Like many others on here, I utilize rancid's set of scripts to handle all the different platform's quirks for access. I then wrap that inside a perl script that can do things in parallel. I'm no developer by any stretch of the imagination but I can poke around in perl badly enough to write some t

Re: World IPv6 Launch Day - June 6, 2012

2012-01-18 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Shumon Huque wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:17:40PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote: >> Another very sad thing about it: >> >> delong-dhcp202:owen (9) ~ % host www.worldipv6launch.org                   >> 2012/01/16 21:24:21 >> www.worldipv6launch.org is an alias f

Re: DNS Attacks

2012-01-18 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote: > > On Jan 18, 2012, at 10:41 30AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: >>> On 18/01/2012 14:18, Leigh Porter wrote: Yeah like I say, it wasn't my idea to put DNS behind firewalls. As l

Re: DNS Attacks

2012-01-18 Thread Steven Bellovin
On Jan 18, 2012, at 10:41 30AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: >> On 18/01/2012 14:18, Leigh Porter wrote: >>> Yeah like I say, it wasn't my idea to put DNS behind firewalls. As long >>> as it is not *my* firewalls I really don't care what they

Re: DNS Attacks

2012-01-18 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 18/01/2012 14:18, Leigh Porter wrote: >> Yeah like I say, it wasn't my idea to put DNS behind firewalls. As long >> as it is not *my* firewalls I really don't care what they do ;-) > > As you're posting here, it looks like it's become you

Re: DNS Attacks

2012-01-18 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 18/01/2012 14:18, Leigh Porter wrote: > Yeah like I say, it wasn't my idea to put DNS behind firewalls. As long > as it is not *my* firewalls I really don't care what they do ;-) As you're posting here, it looks like it's become your problem. :-D Seriously, though, there is no value to maintai

Re: ANNOUNCE: bgptables.merit.edu - understanding visibility of your prefix/AS

2012-01-18 Thread Robert Kisteleki
On 2012.01.18. 15:22, Arturo Servin wrote: > > For example for any given prefix to get which ASNs have originated that > prefix over time and when. > > I think that could be interesting for discovering if a prefix has been > hijacked in the past. > > RIS from RIPE NCC provid

Re: ANNOUNCE: bgptables.merit.edu - understanding visibility of your prefix/AS

2012-01-18 Thread Arturo Servin
For example for any given prefix to get which ASNs have originated that prefix over time and when. I think that could be interesting for discovering if a prefix has been hijacked in the past. RIS from RIPE NCC provides something like this: http://www.ripe.net/data-tool

RE: DNS Attacks

2012-01-18 Thread Leigh Porter
Yeah like I say, it wasn't my idea to put DNS behind firewalls. As long as it is not *my* firewalls I really don't care what they do ;-) -- Leigh Porter > -Original Message- > From: Dennis [mailto:den...@justipit.com] > Sent: 18 January 2012 12:55 > To: Leigh Porter; toor > Cc: nanog@

RE: DNS Attacks

2012-01-18 Thread Drew Weaver
We ran into a 25Gbps SNMP 'reply/amplification attack' from a cable modem network about a month ago. Hopefully the particular network has fixed that issue now, but it was a banner day to be sure. Thanks, -Drew -Original Message- From: virendra rode [mailto:virendra.r...@gmail.com] Se

Re: bgp question

2012-01-18 Thread Deric Kwok
Hi Justin Thank you Could you tell me more about "routing registries"? I would like to learn it 2nd questions? Are you familiar to quagga? ls it supporting equally multipath in different bgp connections? Thank you so much On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote: > On Tue,

Re: DNS Attacks

2012-01-18 Thread virendra rode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi - We've been victims of these attacks many a times and more recently towards our customer dns servers which was rated at ~ 4gbps for a duration of 30mins. Tracking the source of an attack is simplified when the source is more likely to be "valid

Re: DNS Attacks

2012-01-18 Thread Dennis
I agree with Roland on the firewall placement. I add that the attack would have likely succeeded to exhaust the servers. There is alot of recent ddos activity on DNS with what looks like legitimate queries. You should also look at some DOS/ application level protections; Radware and Arbor to

Re: DNS Attacks

2012-01-18 Thread Joel jaeggli
On 1/17/12 23:45 , Leigh Porter wrote: > > > On 18 Jan 2012, at 05:06, "toor" wrote: > >> Hi list, >> >> I am wondering if anyone else has seen a large amount of DNS >> queries coming from various IP ranges in China. I have been trying >> to find a pattern in the attacks but so far I have come

Re: DNS Attacks

2012-01-18 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Jan 18, 2012, at 2:45 AM, Leigh Porter wrote: > The firewall is significant because the attacks killed the firewall as it is > rather under specified (not my idea..). DNS servers (nor any other kind of server, for that matter) should never be placed behind stateful firewalls - the largest