Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Painter"
Not sure where/what you're talking about, but here in the U.S.A, Dish
Network and DirecTV seem to put a max of 7 MPEG 4 HD
channels on a *transponder*.
http://www.satelliteguys.us/thelist/index.php?page=sub
Yup; at va
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Painter"
> Not sure where/what you're talking about, but here in the U.S.A, Dish
> Network and DirecTV seem to put a max of 7 MPEG 4 HD
> channels on a *transponder*.
> http://www.satelliteguys.us/thelist/index.php?page=sub
Yup; at varying bit rates;
- Original Message -
> From: "Philip Dorr"
> But the TV should only be receiving one stream at a time, unless there
> is pip. Each stream would probably be around 5mbps.
I believe you're an optimist.
Weekly football is probably the second most important thing on a TV network
behind the
- Original Message -
> From: "George Fitzpatrick"
> Smart tv's should help, no?
Maybe, maybe not. I think not, and for the reason I just posted as a comment
on Marketplace's story:
I call it the Compatible Color problem. Due to DMCA, SOPA, and other such
corporate paranoia legislation
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 21:40, Michael Painter wrote:
> Not sure where/what you're talking about, but here in the U.S.A, Dish
> Network and DirecTV seem to put a max of 7 MPEG 4 HD channels on a
> *transponder*.
> http://www.satelliteguys.us/thelist/index.php?page=sub
>
> --Michael
>
Referring to
Darius Jahandarie wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 19:11, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:41:15 EST, Jay Ashworth said:
Is 'The Internet' ready to deliver live 1080p HD with very close to zero
dropouts to 25-30 million viewers for 4 hours straight every week, yet?
Depends how much compression
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Philip Dorr wrote:
But the TV should only be receiving one stream at a time, unless there
is pip. Each stream would probably be around 5mbps.
If multicast is used it shouldn't take 150pbps, it should be much lower.
That could be one of the things that helps spur v6 adopt
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:32 PM, wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:19:57 GMT, George Fitzpatrick said:
>> Smart tv's should help, no?
>
> Only so much.
>
> No matter what they show on CSI about enhancing video, if that stream got
> compressed so the football Tim Tebow just threw is just a brown ell
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:19:57 GMT, George Fitzpatrick said:
> Smart tv's should help, no?
Only so much.
No matter what they show on CSI about enhancing video, if that stream got
compressed so the football Tim Tebow just threw is just a brown ellipse,
there;s no legitimate way to put the seams back
Smart tv's should help, no?
- Original Message -
From: Darius Jahandarie [mailto:djahanda...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 08:04 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: Monday Night Footbal -- on Google?
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 19:11, wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:41:15 EST, Jay Ash
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 19:11, wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:41:15 EST, Jay Ashworth said:
>
>> Is 'The Internet' ready to deliver live 1080p HD with very close to zero
>> dropouts to 25-30 million viewers for 4 hours straight every week, yet?
>
> Depends how much compression you use. :)
We w
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:41:15 EST, Jay Ashworth said:
> Is 'The Internet' ready to deliver live 1080p HD with very close to zero
> dropouts to 25-30 million viewers for 4 hours straight every week, yet?
Depends how much compression you use. :)
pgprMJ4o8lC7c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
In this week's CES coverage on Marketplace, venture capitalist Mark Suster
of GRP Partners opines that Google will bid on the broadcast rights to MNF
within the next 5 years.
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/ces-2012/future-television-way-we-watch
Is 'The Internet' ready to deliver live 1
- Original Message -
> From: "Bret Clark"
> On 01/11/2012 04:38 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> > And for the record, I've been quite happy with E-Sol; as long as
> > Knology plays no games with the staff, I don't expect any problems.
>
> It's extremely important you let the right people in Kno
On 01/11/2012 04:38 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
And for the record, I've been quite happy with E-Sol; as long as Knology
plays no games with the staff, I don't expect any problems.
Cheers,
-- jra
It's extremely important you let the right people in Knology know that.
Bret
- Original Message -
> From: "Jay Ashworth"
> No one actually appears to have anything specifically bad to say about
> them, so I guess that's good.
And for the record, I've been quite happy with E-Sol; as long as Knology
plays no games with the staff, I don't expect any problems.
Cheer
- Original Message -
> From: "Jay Ashworth"
> By Knology.
>
> Should I be scared?
>
> My experiences with Knology have been fairly thin, but uniformly negative,
> for at least the last 5 years. But I know that the plural of 'anecdote' is
> not 'data'. That said, I'm accepting all anecdo
If there is a Roadrunner contact monitoring the list can you please
contact me off list regarding a routing issue from ns1/2.adelphia.net
Thanks.
On 1/11/12 9:58 AM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
A better default could be that IGP will be automatically invoked
if DHCP does not supply a default router.
That's ridiculous. You need some link state to even find a
DHCP server. So, the very idea that DHCP would tell you where
your routers are is prep
>Very cool, but they haven't signed *all* of them. comcast.net still
>isn't signed, nor are any of the reverse zones, nor is comcastonline.com
>(in Comcast's SOAs).
We'll be there very soon. Sometimes unplanned work in other areas pulls
resources temporarily, conspiring against the best plans. ;-)
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>> Beyond that, if there are multiple routers, having a default
>> router and relying
> Yes yes we know, and we've understood this for a quarter century or so. My
> disagreement is that even though 99.8% of machines *don't* have multiple
> routers, you seem to be p
21 matches
Mail list logo