Re: playing NICE

With SOPA/PIPA and so much fuss about IP (not the protocol) protection, CBS should sue the government for using an image that looks like a Borg cube from Startrek. -J On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:38 PM, wrote: > > http://csrc.nist.gov/nice/framework/ > > its only a tad over 100 pages. :)  the comm

Re: IP Management Software

Subject: IP Management Software Date: Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 07:33:41PM +0330 Quoting Shahab Vahabzadeh (sh.vahabza...@gmail.com): > Hi everybody, > Can anybody share his/her experience with IP Management software's? Which I > can use it managing near 100K IP Address? > IPPlan is not good enough, I

Re: IP Management Software

++ For many reasons not the least of which is they listen to what their customers need. They run on top of OSS which is great and have the service provider work flow in mind. The only negative is they (at the time of eval) were lacking for enterprise customers, but as I said they listen and are

Re: IP Management Software

you didn't specify "open source"' so I'll throw out IPControl by BT/INS. I used it at my last place to manage about 100k+ DNS entries (3x /16s, misc blocks, RFC1918) and our DNS/DHCP servers. Worked great but not cheap :) -- Eric :) On Dec 16, 2011, at 4:46 PM, deles...@gmail.com wrote: > No

The Cidr Report

This report has been generated at Fri Dec 16 21:12:27 2011 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report. Recent Table History Date

BGP Update Report

BGP Update Report Interval: 08-Dec-11 -to- 15-Dec-11 (7 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS42116 163949 8.9%3345.9 -- ERTH-NCHLN-AS CJSC "ER-Telecom Holding" 2 - AS8402

Re: IP Management Software

Not to be a bandwagon jumper but +1 for 6connect as well. --Original Message-- From: Mike Walter To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: IP Management Software Sent: Dec 16, 2011 4:42 PM +1, agree on 6connect.net. -Original Message- From: Rafael Rodriguez [mailto:packetjoc...@gmail.com

RE: IP Management Software

+1, agree on 6connect.net. -Original Message- From: Rafael Rodriguez [mailto:packetjoc...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 12:55 PM To: Shahab Vahabzadeh Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: IP Management Software Check out 6connect. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 16, 2011, at 11:0

Re: IP Management Software

http://getipv6.info/index.php/IPv6_Management_Tools A good list of stuffs On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Rafael Rodriguez wrote: > Check out 6connect. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 16, 2011, at 11:03, Shahab Vahabzadeh wrote: > >> Hi everybody, >> Can anybody share his/her experience wi

I'm looking for routing/switching guys near the SF Bay Area

Preferably with consulting experience. If that's you, please contact me directly. Thanks. Thomas Cannon CCDP, CCNP, BCNE, CISSP tcan...@c2company.com

playing NICE

http://csrc.nist.gov/nice/framework/ its only a tad over 100 pages. :) the comment period has been extended to january 2012. something to read by the fire over the holiday. /bill

Weekly Routing Table Report

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group. Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net

Re: Wireless/Free Space Enterprise ISP in Palo Alto

I can't help with most, but for wireless gear check out the ubiquity nanobridge stuff. Cheap fast and good. I've seen these work at 5km range with high speeds (eg: 30-60mbps) when using 40mhz channels. Works well to bridge the last mile in cases where you have access to mount hardware. A pair

Wireless/Free Space Enterprise ISP in Palo Alto

Apologies if this is not the most appropriate forum for this, but I am not aware of a better list to use. I recently took over responsibility for the network connectivity at an office in downtown Palo Alto (University and Emerson). Unfortunately, and perhaps ironically, the connectivity options h

Re: IP Management Software

Check out 6connect. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 16, 2011, at 11:03, Shahab Vahabzadeh wrote: > Hi everybody, > Can anybody share his/her experience with IP Management software's? Which I > can use it managing near 100K IP Address? > IPPlan is not good enough, I think its covering all my need and

Re: Is AS information useful for security?

On 15/12/2011 16:28, Drew Weaver wrote: -Original Message- From: Justin M. Streiner [mailto:strei...@cluebyfour.org] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 9:45 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Is AS information useful for security? origin-AS could be another story. If you know of an A

Comcast Mail Admin

Apologies to the list for the noise, but if there's a clueful Comcast mail admin on list, can you please get in touch with me off list? My employer's network is having problems sending mail to your domain, and several attempts to clear it up using the "Blocked Provider Request Form" have faile

Re: IP Management Software

Try noc project On Friday, December 16, 2011, Shahab Vahabzadeh wrote: > Hi everybody, > Can anybody share his/her experience with IP Management software's? Which I > can use it managing near 100K IP Address? > IPPlan is not good enough, I think its >

Re: IP Management Software

Shahab Vahabzadeh (sh.vahabzadeh) writes: > Hi everybody, > Can anybody share his/her experience with IP Management software's? Which I > can use it managing near 100K IP Address? > IPPlan is not good enough, I think its covering all my need and not fully > flexible. > If you have discuss this befo

IP Management Software

Hi everybody, Can anybody share his/her experience with IP Management software's? Which I can use it managing near 100K IP Address? IPPlan is not good enough, I think its covering all my need and not fully flexible. If you have discuss this before here please share me the link. Thanks -- Regards,

RE: Overall Netflix bandwidth usage numbers on a network?

From: Blake Hudson [mailto:bl...@ispn.net] > > Yeah, that's an interesting one. We currently utilize netflow for this, > but you also need to consider that netflix streaming is just port 80 > www traffic. Because netflix uses CDNs, its difficult to pin down the > traffic to specific hosts in t

Re: Overall Netflix bandwidth usage numbers on a network?

I'll take a guess they are back logged - they have been working on our traffic stats since a week before that posting made it to nanog list --- Sent via IPhone On 2011-12-16, at 9:16 AM, "Dennis Burgess" wrote: > Same here. > > --- > Den

Re: BGP and Firewalls...

We run redundant solutions for a number of our customers and have always decoupled the routing and firewalling. I can think of one situation where the customer manages the BGP and firewall failover on their firewalls, it doesn't work too well. The issue as I see it is that in the event of a d

RE: Overall Netflix bandwidth usage numbers on a network?

Same here. --- Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training - Author of "Learn RouterOS" > -

Re: Overall Netflix bandwidth usage numbers on a network?

Requests to this address appear to go unanswered? Dave Temkin wrote the following on 12/11/2011 6:29 PM: Feel free to contact peering@netflixcom - we're happy to provide you with delivery statistics for traffic terminating on your network. Regards, -Dave Temkin Netflix On 12/7/11 8:57 AM, Bla

Re: BGP and Firewalls...

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Gregory Croft wrote: > Does anyone have any experience with using firewalls as edge devices > when BGP is concerned? Doing so very successfully with Fortigate devices.

Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy.

On Dec 15, 2011 10:35 PM, "Brielle Bruns" wrote: > > On 12/15/11 3:31 PM, Ricky Beam wrote: >> >> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:36:32 -0500, David Conrad >> wrote: >>> >>> ... I had thought new allocations are based on demonstrated need. The >>> fact that addresses are in use would seem to suggest they'