> -Original Message-
> From: Chaim Rieger [mailto:chaim.rie...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 14 December 2011 06:10
> To: IPv4 Brokers; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Your Christmas Bonus Has Arrived
>
> What do you have for those that don't do the whole Jesus thing ?
>
That would be Hell..
--
I really didn't follow to much of this thread, it's all a bit weird with
some obvious industry under currents running that I don't follow.
What I will say is that I'm currently involved with exactly this issue
and would have to say that it's all just getting sillier by the day.
I've been rese
Is there a comapny behind that gmail mailbox? And they could make a deal with
MS & Borders using the same mailbox?
--
Babak Farrokhi
On Dec 14, 2011, at 9:10 AM, "Patrick W. Gilmore" wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2011, at 11:56 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Matt Taylor wrote:
>
What do you have for those that don't do the whole Jesus thing ?
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:56:19 EST, "Justin M. Streiner" said:
> As far as I'm concerned, they can have as much of 10/8 as they want. My
> rate per /24 is very reasonable.
Oh, I don't think they'll fall for that, everbody knows 10/8 and 192.168/16 are
private networks. However, I bet I can underb
On Dec 13, 2011, at 11:56 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Matt Taylor wrote:
>> On 14/12/2011 2:13 PM, IPv4 Brokers wrote:
>>> We are paying up-front (or escrow) for the use of networks that are not
>>> used. The networks are used for honeypots and other research.
>>>
>>> T
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Matt Taylor wrote:
On 14/12/2011 2:13 PM, IPv4 Brokers wrote:
We are paying up-front (or escrow) for the use of networks that are not
used. The networks are used for honeypots and other research.
The networks may be used for a month or longer, you are paid an agreed
u
... Heh
>
> ipv4brok...@gmail.com
>
> -.-
>
> If domain squatting and patent trolling are both legitimate sometimes
multi-million dollar businesses are you really surprised?
Do the blocks have to come from a company I still work for? If not I have
a boat load..
2011/12/13 IPv4 Brokers
> Do you have subnets that are not in use, or only used for specific
> purposes? If so, please contact us.
>
> We are paying up-front (or escrow) for the use of networks that are n
On 14/12/2011 2:13 PM, IPv4 Brokers wrote:
Do you have subnets that are not in use, or only used for specific
purposes? If so, please contact us.
We are paying up-front (or escrow) for the use of networks that are not
used. The networks are used for honeypots and other research.
You do not h
Do you have subnets that are not in use, or only used for specific
purposes? If so, please contact us.
We are paying up-front (or escrow) for the use of networks that are not
used. The networks are used for honeypots and other research.
You do not have to modify your BGP announcements, establi
(Apologies for an slightly-OT posting)
Last year, EFF organized an open letter from network engineers against
Internet censorship legislation being considered by the US Senate
(https://eff.org/deeplinks/2010/09/open-letter). Along with other activists'
efforts, we successfully delayed that propos
Solar winds as you send in the specific mib required to monitor and a
week later it's general release
Sent from my iPhone
On 2011-12-13, at 7:11 PM, "Robert Brockway"
wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Eric J Esslinger wrote:
>
>> I'm not looking to monitor a massive infrastructure: 3 web sites
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Eric J Esslinger wrote:
I'm not looking to monitor a massive infrastructure: 3 web sites, 2 mail
servers (pop,imap,submission port, https webmail), 4 dns servers
(including lookups to ensure they're not listening but not talking), and
one inbound mx. A few network points t
For those with Colo space in Melbourne FL. Please reply to me offlist; looking
to deploy a POP there.
Thanks.
Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint!
On 12/13/2011 5:11 AM, Michiel Klaver wrote:
At 22-07-2011 20:59, Eric J Esslinger wrote:
I'm not looking to monitor a massive infrastructure: 3 web sites, 2 mail
servers (pop,imap,submission port, https webmail), 4 dns servers (including
lookups to ensure they're not listening but not talking
At 22-07-2011 20:59, Eric J Esslinger wrote:
> I'm not looking to monitor a massive infrastructure: 3 web sites, 2 mail
> servers (pop,imap,submission port, https webmail), 4 dns servers (including
> lookups to ensure they're not listening but not talking), and one inbound mx.
> A few network po
On Dec 11, 2011, at 6:52 AM, John Curran wrote:
> The sooner we get the content on IPv6 in addition to IPv4, the sooner
> that connecting new customers up via IPv6 without additional unique
> IPv4 address space becomes viable (and obviously if we had the vast
> majority of content already o
Dear colleagues,
As a follow-up to the recent article "The Curious Case of 128.0/16", we
now looked at 128.0/16 as seen from RIPE Atlas:
https://labs.ripe.net/Members/dfk/128.0-16-seen-by-atlas
Kind regards,
Mirjam Kuehne
RIPE NCC
19 matches
Mail list logo
