Hello,
I had an issue with lowered MTU through a portion of my network, and besides
the expected impact, some clients were unable to access resources either
directly hosted or indirectly served content by EdgeCast Networks (had to look
at traceroutes and view source to determine). I also found
This report has been generated at Fri Nov 11 21:12:18 2011 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 03-Nov-11 -to- 09-Nov-11 (6 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS982950212 2.8% 50.7 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet
Backbone
2 - AS84022
On 11/11/2011 1:11 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
Would it be*nice* to have RA Guard and DHCP6 snooping in place? Yes. Is it
totally impossible to deploy IPv6 until they're fully baked? Not at all - just
need to be aware of the issues and be prepared to mitigate. Sure it raises the
risk
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:04:31 GMT, Nick Hilliard said:
> another practical upshot is that switch manufacturers now need to support
> both RA Guard and DHCPv6 snooping instead of just a single protocol like we
> have in ipv4. That is, unless you're ok with the idea of arbitrary
> priority RA pack
On Nov 11, 2011, at 8:02 AM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 06:55:03AM -0800, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>>
>> The networks I run have been dual stacked for 5+ years. It works.
>>
>> --
>> Leo Bicknell - bickn...@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
>>PGP keys at http://
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 06:55:03AM -0800, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> The networks I run have been dual stacked for 5+ years. It works.
>
> --
>Leo Bicknell - bickn...@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
> PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
and I've been running single-stack IPv6 ne
On 11/11/2011 15:56, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
And yes, there's some RA/DHCP issues - but the *practical* upshot is that it's
hard to DHCP a v6-only host and get stuff like DNS and NTP servers to them.
another practical upshot is that switch manufacturers now need to support
both RA Guard
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:15:46 MST, Brett Watson said:
> Awesome, so you've solved the multi-homing issues with v6? The RA/DHCPv6
> issues? (I'll just leave it at those three).
What multi-homing issues? We've been multihomed on the IPv6 side for... ages.
And yes, there's some RA/DHCP issues - but
Hey all.
I wanted to say thanks for all the advice.
Barry
-Original Message-
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jba...@brightok.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 6:06 PM
To: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Firewalls - Ease of Use and Maintenance?
On 11/10/2011 12:24
Any one else seeing this?
This was done yesterday from Hawaii.
tracert speedtest.saas.infor.com
3 5 ms 5 ms 4 ms ip64-75-240-210.aloha.net [64.75.240.210]
4 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms hnl-edge-02.inet.qwest.net [67.129.94.69]
5 *** Request time
In a message written on Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:15:46AM -0700, Brett Watson
wrote:
> > The tide is coming. The tide is wet. The tide is full of IPv6 water.
> > Get over it.
>
> Awesome, so you've solved the multi-homing issues with v6? The RA/DHCPv6
> issues? (I'll just leave it at those three
actually - Paul Francis has done the community a massive favor by making the
argument
for NAT as a viable tool strong enough that NAT and NAT-like technologies are
pervasive.
NAT is even used to "glue" v4 and v6 enclaves together.
So it is too early to tell if IPv6-only will be the inevitable
On Nov 10, 2011, at 11:59 AM, David Conrad wrote:
> A tiny dose of reality:
> - The Internet (and world population as a whole) is growing most rapidly in
> the Asia/Pacific region.
> - There are companies who demand IPv4 addresses for which the combined yearly
> budgets of all the RIRs amounts
Lucky rich you to have such capacious v4 connectivity to be worrying about such
downstream stuff. The rest of the world is starring at abyss of zero
connectivity unless it deploys v6.
Solve that one.
Christian
On 11 Nov 2011, at 07:15, Brett Watson wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 6:56 AM, Le
Yes, AS20940 is on HKIX. You can check HKIX's Looking Glass (of MLPA Route
Servers) at http://www.hkix.net/hkix/hkixlg.htm or
http://www.hkix.net/hkix/connected.htm . I'm sure they do BLPA over HKIX too.
Regards,
Che-Hoo
On 11 Nov, 2011, at 4:19 PM, Harris Hui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybod
Hi,
Does anybody know where is the Akamai Edge servers located in Hong Kong?
Which ISPs they are using? Are they peering with HKIX?
Please advise.
Thanks
Harris
18 matches
Mail list logo
