On Saturday 24 September 2011 22:24, Adrian wrote:
> On Saturday 24 September 2011 21:27, Chris Woodfield wrote:
> > Hearing rumblings of a major AT&T Wireless outage in southern California.
> > Anyone have more detail? Limited to cell towers or are transit circuits
> > affected?
>
> Apparently the
On Saturday 24 September 2011 21:27, Chris Woodfield wrote:
> Hearing rumblings of a major AT&T Wireless outage in southern California.
> Anyone have more detail? Limited to cell towers or are transit circuits
> affected?
>
Apparently their switching and core infrastructure (affecting both voice a
Hearing rumblings of a major AT&T Wireless outage in southern California.
Anyone have more detail? Limited to cell towers or are transit circuits
affected?
-Chris
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> Just an fyi for anyone who has a marketing person dreaming up a big nxdomain
> redirect business cases, the stats are actually very very poor... it does
> not make much money at all.
> It is very important to ask the redirect partners about y
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> Just an fyi for anyone who has a marketing person dreaming up a big nxdomain
> redirect business cases, the stats are actually very very poor... it does
> not make much money at all.
>
> It is very important to ask the redirect partners about
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Will Dean wrote:
>
> On Sep 24, 2011, at 9:07 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
>> I think actually.. earthlink uses barefruit? (or they did when ...
>> kaminsky was off doing his destruction of the dns liars gan
Just an fyi for anyone who has a marketing person dreaming up a big nxdomain
redirect business cases, the stats are actually very very poor... it does
not make much money at all.
It is very important to ask the redirect partners about yields... meaning,
you may find that less than 5% of nxdomain r
On Sep 24, 2011, at 9:07 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> I think actually.. earthlink uses barefruit? (or they did when ...
> kaminsky was off doing his destruction of the dns liars gangs...)
> Maybe the same backend is used though for the adv
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Will Dean wrote:
>
> The "JOMAX.NET" response is indicative that there's a Paxfire box
> in the mix,
> intercepting the DNS query (probably installed by the ISP).
>
I think actually.. earthlink uses barefr
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Will Dean wrote:
The "JOMAX.NET" response is indicative that there's a Paxfire box
in the mix,
intercepting the DNS query (probably installed by the ISP).
> Anyone out there in Earthlink land? I am seeing what looks to be a cache
> poisoning attack on ns1.
Anyone out there in Earthlink land? I am seeing what looks to be a cache
poisoning attack on ns1.mindspring.com.
Sporadic of course so it takes a few queries to replicate.
will$ dig www.google.com @207.69.188.185
; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> www.google.com @207.69.188.185
;; global options: +cmd
;; G
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 8:57 PM, jim deleskie wrote:
> Wouldn't it make more sense to filter in bound default? or use a single
> static default if you where worried about that?
Yes, the aesthetics of using a "/1 route" for that purpose are very poor.
Don't implement design objectives using s
12 matches
Mail list logo
