On 08/14/2011 07:43 PM, Tim Wilde wrote:
> On 8/14/2011 8:36 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
>
>
> Yes, they prove that IPv6 is not a viable technology as it currently
> stands and we should be working on the next big thing, of course!
> IPv42, here I come!
:)
It certainly is being debated back and fo
On Aug 14, 2011, at 5:43 PM, Tim Wilde wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 8/14/2011 8:36 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
>> Can someone explain the operational relevance of the never ending v6
>> threads that are the EXACT SAME ARGUMENTS over and over and over
>> again?
On 08/14/2011 05:45 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
> I don't know, but 50 people had snarfed the picture I posted within
> 30 minutes, a few hundred have by now, and it's the weekend.
Yes. Exactly. I'll start my more operational focused threads on Monday.
Plus Randy started a personal backups thread. I need
All your dads are in the closet.
- Original Message -
> From: "Leo Bicknell"
> The GS110TP is a 8 port 10/100/1000 w/POE + 2 port SFP switch, no fan:
> http://www.netgear.com/business/products/switches/smart-switches/GS110TP.aspx
>
> Note that it only has a 48w power budget, so it can't do full power
> on each port.
>
> Of course, if he had local AC power available, it would kinda defeat one of
> the points of having PoE, which is to be able to put switches where there
> isn't a convenient AC drop to begin with.
But wait, there is more...
Maybe you want your POE devices (like phones) to stay alive during a pow
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 19:07 -0700, Matthew Petach wrote:
> Of course, if he had local AC power available, it would kinda defeat one of
> the points of having PoE, which is to be able to put switches where there
> isn't a convenient AC drop to begin with. ^_^;
True. Leo's point of being able to
Hi,
The CPE we're providing to our customers from Billion (78xxN/NL, 74xxNX etc)
and AVM (Fritz!Box 7290 and 7390) that have IPv6 code do have IPv6 stateful
firewalls.
Our requirement was that, as much as possible that the IPv4 and IPv6 outcome
should be similar (with obvious exceptions around
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:11 -0700, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
>> So, there you go, a way to star 8 8-port switches off a central switch
>> with the remote switches needing no power. This allows UPS'ing the
>> central switch only, while knowing they
I'm with this too, my house is much less complicated than it used to be. I
have dual WAN (Comcast Business Class and cheap DLS as a failover), fed into my
Cisco 3750 "core" switch. I have a Sonicwall NSA2400 as my primary Gateway
from LAN, with a Secondary Gateway of my Cisco UC520 (mostly for
On 8/14/2011 2:43 PM, Tim Wilde wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/14/2011 8:36 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
Can someone explain the operational relevance of the never ending v6
threads that are the EXACT SAME ARGUMENTS over and over and over
again? :)
Yes, they prove that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/14/2011 8:36 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
> Can someone explain the operational relevance of the never ending v6
> threads that are the EXACT SAME ARGUMENTS over and over and over
> again? :)
Yes, they prove that IPv6 is not a viable technology as
On 08/14/2011 03:49 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX) wrote:
> I hope someone will explain the operational relevance
> of this ...
Small home compute centers/networks need care and feeding as well. I've
learned a lot from this thread. Things like common designs/layouts,
cooling, POE switches et
On 08/13/2011 08:26 AM, David Swafford wrote:
> I'm borrowing a room at mom's place for this presently :-D, as the 1
> bedroom apartment was a bit too small!
I've got a two bedroom apartment currently. Seriously considering a 3
bedroom place. So I can have a dedicated server room/office and a gues
> I hope someone will explain the operational relevance
> of this ...
I don't know, but 50 people had snarfed the picture I posted within
30 minutes, a few hundred have by now, and it's the weekend.
Fun.
... JG
--
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
"We cal
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:11 -0700, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> So, there you go, a way to star 8 8-port switches off a central switch
> with the remote switches needing no power. This allows UPS'ing the
> central switch only, while knowing they will all stay up.
In some cases, that's not always a grea
I hope someone will explain the operational relevance
of this ...
Sun V100 FreeBSD firewall/border gateway
Sun V100 Plan 9 kernel porting test bed
Sun V100 OpenBSD build/test/port box
Intel 8-core Solaris fileserver and zones host
AMDx4Random OS workstation
In a message written on Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:08:28PM -0700, Leo Bicknell
wrote:
> The holy grail I'm searching for now? A GigE switch with POE,
> unmanaged is ok, and probably preferred from a price perspective;
> but with NO FAN.
Based on a private message and some poking around it appears N
b/c of coverage issues.
Cheers
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Charles N Wyble [mailto:char...@knownelement.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 11:31 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Verizon Business - LTE?
On 08/13/2011 12:54 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
>
> I was hoping to use LTE for a
With the dongle but installed in a cradlepoint with a high gain antenna
Cheers
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Charles N Wyble [mailto:char...@knownelement.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 11:37 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Verizon Business - LTE?
On 08/13/2011 11:52 PM, Ryan Finn
On 08/13/2011 11:56 PM, Tammy A. Wisdom wrote:
Clear is an absolutely horrible ISP.
I've heard people say that. I've used them heavily in Los Angeles and
Austin for over a year (almost two now actually). Never had a problem.
It is quite common for it to go in and out
Probably in fringe co
On 08/13/2011 11:52 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
The two problems I have with Clear is that it does not work well indoors
Oh? The dongle you mean? Yes. The dongle is complete garbage. The
Motorolla CPE has been top notch. Tried it various places in my
apartment (near window, not near window). Ke
On 08/13/2011 01:09 PM, chris wrote:
I'm in princeton, nj and I recently moved into a new place and had no
internet for about a week and had my router in client mode grabbing hotspot
from my phone and it worked surprisingly well. Of course latency can be a
bit jumpy but my speeds overall were bet
On 08/13/2011 12:54 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
I was hoping to use LTE for a large number of sites we are about to
roll out instead of DS1s. But looks like we will go down the TDM route.
Why is that?
I ran a nationwide network of digital signage systems with about 500 of
them being 3g (mix
> > My home backups are somewhat large and not yet offsite due to their size.
> > (~4.7TB).
> >
We (NAC) run a rather large ZFS thing to sell cheap 'scratch space.' When I say
large, I think it surpasses well over 100 TB at this point.
So for me, it was easy. At home, my stuff spins on disk (n
Leo,
> Why? Unless you live in a HUGE house, you can do 10GE over copper to
> all rooms. Copper is infinately easier to run and terminate.
Because you need optical so that you can run the feed into the backup
servers in the EMP protected room? :-)
(I have a shelter that had to be added for build
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> My home backups are somewhat large and not yet offsite due to their size.
> (~4.7TB).
>
> I've considered just subbing to backblaze as it's "cheap" on a single-host
> basis, but need something closer to ~5-7TB plus some room for growth (mayb
On Aug 13, 2011, at 10:44 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2011, at 1:12 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> charles skipped what i see as a highly critical question, personal
>> backup.
>
> I've been wondering this as well.
>
> My home backups are somewhat large and not yet offsite due to their size.
28 matches
Mail list logo
