On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:35:05 -0400
"MageMojo" wrote:
> Does anyone know of competitors to internap's fcp product?
Also, I would greatly appreciate if anybody could explain what
technically is internap fcp.
--
With best regards,
Gregory Edigarov
_
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 05:17:55PM -0700, George Herbert wrote:
> Micron has some large-cap SLC drives in the chain for
> September/October/ish timeframes.
>
> Ramdisk with rsync or rdiffbackup to spinning storage will do just fine.
Or hybrid zfs pools.
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl
Does anyone know of competitors to internap's fcp product?
_
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
Hi all,
Looking for tools to optimize bgp routes based on performance, cost and
reliability. Paid, open source, doesn't matter. Even presentations or
research papers on performing tasks are welcome. But not configuration
guides on multihoming :) Specifically in the context of a hosting prov
On Jul 20, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> SSDs can be a good alternative these days as well. Some of them have gotten
> to be quite fast. Sure, you'll have to replace them more often than spinning
> media,
> but,
Actually the the scale of writes associated with this application is unlik
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Daniel Espejel
wrote:
> Thank you very much, now I'll try to perform some deployments over a
> C3600 w/NS module.
Unfortunately that is only a limited reproduction of what happens in a switch,
making it a nice toy. Having an ability to simulate the execution of
SSDs can be a good alternative these days as well. Some of them have gotten
to be quite fast. Sure, you'll have to replace them more often than spinning
media,
but, the write times can be quite a bit better.
Owen
On Jul 20, 2011, at 3:28 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:31 AM,
Anyone know what happened to the slide decks from
the most recent NANOG? They used to be linked off
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog52/agenda.php
but seem to have gone missing. :(
Thanks!
Matt
_
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
In message <21226672.1947.1311207580967.javamail.r...@benjamin.baylink.com>,
Jay Ashworth writes:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Jimmy Hess"
>
> > Of course, committing to a RAMDISK tricks the DHCP server software.
> > The danger is that if your DHCP server suffers an untimely reboot
Thank you very much, now I'll try to perform some deployments over a
C3600 w/NS module.
Best regards.
--
Daniel Espejel Perez
_
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
- Original Message -
> From: "Jimmy Hess"
> Of course, committing to a RAMDISK tricks the DHCP server software.
> The danger is that if your DHCP server suffers an untimely reboot, you
> will have no transactionally safe record of the leases issued, when
> the replacement comes up, or the
Good luck buying X25-Es; they're out of production and all gone from
supply chain. Replacement 710 and 720 models are ETA in late August
at the moment.
Micron has some large-cap SLC drives in the chain for
September/October/ish timeframes.
Ramdisk with rsync or rdiffbackup to spinning storage wi
On Jul 20, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Walter Keen wrote:
> We've recently setup ISC DHCPd with failover for lease information, and
> LDAP as a configuration source (mostly because of our need for
> dynamically adding dhcp reservations for cable modems, etc) -- we don't
> have any performance issues thu
We've recently setup ISC DHCPd with failover for lease information, and
LDAP as a configuration source (mostly because of our need for
dynamically adding dhcp reservations for cable modems, etc) -- we don't
have any performance issues thus far, but I'd imagine in a failover
environment, it migh
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Nick Colton wrote:
> We were seeing similar issues with low leases, moved the dhcpd.leases file
> to a ramdisk and went from ~200 leases per second to something like 8,000
> leases per second.
Yes, blame RFC2131's requirement that a DHCP server is to ensure that
hey,
> The free DHCP solution, ISC, seems to be having scaling issues (i.e.
> handling only about 200 DHCPDISCOVER and 20 DHCPRENEW requests), and I
> was wondering if anyone had any open source suggestions of solutions
> that could scale much better?
You are doing something wrong:
* turn off pi
Anyone have any good info on how many ARP entries one of the Huawei
CX600 routers can take?
http://www.huawei.com/en/products/data-communication/metro-services-platform/cx600/index.htm
I will be passing about 1000 L2TP tunnels to a router before it, and
the subscriber network that will be hitting
Ask your Cisco SE about IOU licensing and its capabilities regarding
switching. You can do some limited switch lab work with dynamips and an
NM-16-ESW though.
On Jul 20, 2011 12:08 PM, "Daniel Espejel"
wrote:
>
> Hello list!.
>
> I want to virtualize a CISCO Switch with CISCO IOS 12.x to perform s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco ASR 9000 Series Routers Line Card IP Version 4
Denial of Service Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20110720-asr9k
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2011 July 20 1600 UTC (GMT
Hello list!.
I want to virtualize a CISCO Switch with CISCO IOS 12.x to perform some
test on its RA-Guard implementation. By searching over Internet I've
found that its possible to virtualize some devices such as routers using
GSN3 and a CISCO IOS image. Is it possible to do something like this b
We were seeing similar issues with low leases, moved the dhcpd.leases file
to a ramdisk and went from ~200 leases per second to something like 8,000
leases per second.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:08 PM, George Herbert
wrote:
> 220-ish per second sounds roughly like a 1-disk (or 2 mirrored disk)
>
On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > As a temporary workaround, you can use an alternative hostname which will
> > point to a another mirror (ns6.dnswl.org (http://ns6.dnswl.org)).
>
> % host ns6.dnswl.org (http://ns6.dnswl.org)
> Host ns6.dnswl.org (http://ns6.dnswl.org)
>> opening tcp connection to rsync2.dnswl.org port 873
>> rsync: failed to connect to rsync2.dnswl.org (85.25.63.16): Operation
>> timed out (60)
>> rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(122)
>> [Receiver=3.0.8]
>>
>> any other paying users seeing this or know anything? no re
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> opening tcp connection to rsync2.dnswl.org port 873
> rsync: failed to connect to rsync2.dnswl.org (85.25.63.16): Operation
> timed out (60)
> rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(122)
> [Receiver=3.0.8]
>
> any other pa
24 matches
Mail list logo
