Re: How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?

2011-04-13 Thread Tore Anderson
* Graham Beneke > Only 0.3 of a /8 left[1] before the rationing policy kicks in. Hi, Actually, they're already empty. Chinanet Fujian Province Network allocated 498432 addresses today, spread out over 1102(!) individual prefixes in the range /21-/24. Unless any resources has been returned to th

How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?

2011-04-13 Thread Graham Beneke
Only 0.3 of a /8 left[1] before the rationing policy kicks in. I hope everyone is ready :-) [1] http://www.apnic.net/community/ipv4-exhaustion/graphical-information -- Graham Beneke

Looking for Postmaster contact for js.pentagon.mil

2011-04-13 Thread Mark Keymer
We have a client that we resent moved to some new address space (We have had the the space for a couple of years now) However it looks like the mail server for js.pentagon.mil are droping all packet to them. :( If anyone had some leads on a way to contact them. Please contact me off-list. We did

Re: Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Chad Dailey
Sometimes with alternate propulsion: http://img24.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc188&image=ab44c_incroyable.jpg On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Lynda wrote: > On 4/13/2011 12:44 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > >> sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says >>> they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8

Re: Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Andrew D Kirch
On 4/13/11 4:50 PM, Leigh Porter wrote: > On 13 Apr 2011, at 21:45, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > and pigs fly >>> Well, sometimes they do. >> There underlying problem here is flying sheep: >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vkw2DdoskPY >> >> Note the accurate summarization of the entire issue.

Re: Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Leigh Porter
On 13 Apr 2011, at 21:45, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: >>> and pigs fly >> Well, sometimes they do. > > There underlying problem here is flying sheep: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vkw2DdoskPY > > Note the accurate summarization of the entire issue. > Yes that's it. 172/8 is nesting. Perhap

Re: Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
and pigs fly Well, sometimes they do. There underlying problem here is flying sheep: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vkw2DdoskPY Note the accurate summarization of the entire issue.

Re: Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Ryan Malayter
On Apr 13, 2:44 pm, Randy Bush wrote: > > sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says > > they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, > > and pigs fly And to think, Google manages to get by with the equivalents of a few / 16 or smaller.

Re: Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Lynda
On 4/13/2011 12:44 PM, Randy Bush wrote: sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, and pigs fly Well, sometimes they do. http://wardsci.com/product.asp_Q_pn_E_IG0035229 [Flying Pig: Unforgettable Fun with Physics] -- "The person

Re: Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Joel Jaeggli
On 4/13/11 6:11 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says > they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, > which is obviously bogus. They do have a 168.246.0.0/16 > however. > > Any tool to look the other two up quickly, without having to > iterat

Re: Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, Bugger. Now I have to renumber out of my 172.16/12 subnets :-(

Re: Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:44:19 +0900, Randy Bush said: > > sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says > > they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, > > and pigs fly Only if they're RFC1925 compliant. :) pgpNN8r9epD9z.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Doug Barton
On 04/13/2011 12:44, Randy Bush wrote: sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, and pigs fly /me pops open the kevlar umbrella (thanks for the warning!) -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.

Re: Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Leigh Porter
On 13 Apr 2011, at 20:44, Randy Bush wrote: >> sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says >> they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, > > and pigs fly > You can make almost anything fly if you put enough oomph behind it.. -- Leigh ___

Re: Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Don . DuQuette
Ill throw in 10.0.0.0 /8 for just the lint, but it better be really good lint From: Paul Graydon To: nanog@nanog.org Date: 04/13/2011 03:54 PM Subject:Re: Syngenta space On 04/13/2011 09:48 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >

Re: Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Paul Graydon
On 04/13/2011 09:48 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Randy Bush wrote: sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, and pigs fly indeed, an impressive claim, how much for it all? *checks pockets* $5 an

Re: Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Randy Bush
>>> sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says >>> they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, >> and pigs fly > indeed, an impressive claim, how much for it all? i am particularly impressed by the annexation of some of the rfc1918 space. randy

Re: Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >> sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says >> they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, > > and pigs fly indeed, an impressive claim, how much for it all?

Re: Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Randy Bush
> sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says > they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, and pigs fly

Re: Implementations/suggestions for Multihoming IPv6 for DSL sites

2011-04-13 Thread Jeff Wheeler
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > This is not true. There are several works out there showing that the FIB will > not grow as you are saying. Having taken some time to discuss this off-list with Luigi. I'd already read the paper he had in mind, which does not address DoS o

historical pricing data

2011-04-13 Thread Chris McDonald
This may be the wrong place to ask but maybe one of you could point me in a direction. I'm looking for [ideally] historical market pricing for mpls/ipl between as many as possible city pairs [with a focus toward Asia] as well as ip maybe 5 year back. Thanks, Chris

SDH 1+1 protected circuit and OSPF minimal setup on a single Juniper platform.

2011-04-13 Thread Lorenzo Rossi
Hi, I have some doubts about the minimal configuration to handle an SDH 1+1 protected circuit with OSPF on a single Juniper router platform (one interface as the Working Circuit and another interface as the Protect Circuit). Reading the JunOS documentation, for instance the 9.4 JunOS version: ht

RE: Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
> -Original Message- > From: Eugen Leitl [mailto:eu...@leitl.org] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 6:11 AM > To: NANOG list > Subject: Syngenta space > > Hi, > > sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says > they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, > which is obviously

Re: Barracuda Networks is at it again: Any Suggestions as to an Alternative?

2011-04-13 Thread AP NANOG
I would look into Asatro, they have a solid product and good support. If you want a contact person let me know and I will email you directly. On 4/9/11 11:55 AM, pr...@cnsny.net wrote: Andrew, We use and offer Postini - a front end service. Postini is a anti virus and spam filter, and can spo

Syngenta space

2011-04-13 Thread Eugen Leitl
Hi, sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, which is obviously bogus. They do have a 168.246.0.0/16 however. Any tool to look the other two up quickly, without having to iterate through the entire second octet? Thanks! -- Eugen* Le