Ernie Rubi ðëúá òì éãé:
Um, down for everyone reports it as down for everyone.
Any news as to what may be causing it?
Ernesto M. Rubi
Sr. Network Engineer
AMPATH/CIARA
Florida International Univ, Miami
Reply-to: erne...@cs.fiu.edu
Cell: 786-282-6783
> Disclaimer: Limits of Liability and Disclaimer: This message is for the named
> person's use only. It may contain sensitive and private proprietary or
> legally privileged information. You must not, directly or indirectly, use,
> disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if
Hey all,
I have an urgent (today/tomorrow) requirement for how to deliver a normal
internet service in Singapore... most likely the downtown area.
Has anyone got any contacts or links to pricing - also maybe someone who can
install a router configured in Australia.
I'm looking for a good downl
Hello everyone!!!
Thank you for all answers. These answers are really what I was looking for
Regards
./diogo -montagner
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Tim Jackson wrote:
> Each KM does not ad 4.9ms..
>
> More like ~1msec per 100km...
>
> 1/4/msec usually per OEO conversion (depends
Each KM does not ad 4.9ms..
More like ~1msec per 100km...
1/4/msec usually per OEO conversion (depends on the box)...
--
Tim
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Mike Mainer wrote:
> Exfo, JDSU, Fluke all offer hand held test sets that can run a rfc2544
> (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2544.txt)
Exfo, JDSU, Fluke all offer hand held test sets that can run a rfc2544 (
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2544.txt) test. Do you own the path between cpe
<-> cpe? Remeber that for each km of fiber distance add about 4.9ms (one
way) of latency. Do basline tests on your cpe gear so you know what you are
On 10/27/2010 8:54 PM, Tim Jackson wrote:
We do ITU-T Y.156sam/EtherSAM and/or RFC2544 tests depending on the
customer requirements. (some customers require certain tests for x
minutes)
+1
Think JDSU also has some nice boxes. There's a few rack systems you can
use which can either generate pa
We dispatch a technician to an end-site and perform tests either
head->head with another test set, or to a loop at a far-end..
We do ITU-T Y.156sam/EtherSAM and/or RFC2544 tests depending on the
customer requirements. (some customers require certain tests for x
minutes)
http://www.exfo.com/en/Pro
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Nathan Eisenberg
wrote:
>> http://www.arlnow.com/2010/10/27/nsf-building-evacuated-in-ballston-
>> after-apparent-lightning-strike/
>>
>> lightning strike -> electrical fire
>
> At the science foundation. Nature has a sense of irony.
The real irony is that the fo
For comissioning testing, you can use a hardware packet generator to send
packets to an Ethernet demarcation with a MAC-swap loopback, and analyse the
returned traffic.
For ongoing performance monitoring, having Y.1731 capable CPE is highly
desirable.
Jonathon.
-Original Message-
Fro
many switch and routing vendors provide such functionality in their os.
this data can then be collected via SNMP, stored for reports and
forwarded as events, when necessary.
tate
On 10/27/2010 7:32 PM, Diogo Montagner wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am looking for performance test methodology for et
Hello everyone,
I am looking for performance test methodology for ethernet-based
circuits. These ethernet circuits can be: dark-fiber, l2circuit
(martini), l2vpn (kompella), vpls or ng-vpls. Sometimes, the ethernet
circuit can be a mix of these technologies, like below:
CPE <-> metro-e <-> l2circ
> http://www.arlnow.com/2010/10/27/nsf-building-evacuated-in-ballston-
> after-apparent-lightning-strike/
>
> lightning strike -> electrical fire
>
> -Dave
At the science foundation. Nature has a sense of irony.
http://www.arlnow.com/2010/10/27/nsf-building-evacuated-in-ballston-after-apparent-lightning-strike/
lightning strike -> electrical fire
-Dave
On Oct 27, 2010, at 3:58 PM, Samuel Petreski wrote:
> I think they had a fire in the building.
>
> --Samuel
>
> --
> Samuel Petreski
> Sr. Security
I think they had a fire in the building.
--Samuel
--
Samuel Petreski
Sr. Security Analyst
Georgetown University
-Original Message-
From: Ernie Rubi [mailto:erne...@cs.fiu.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 3:46 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: NSF.gov Unavailable
Um, down for every
Um, down for everyone reports it as down for everyone.
Any news as to what may be causing it?
Ernesto M. Rubi
Sr. Network Engineer
AMPATH/CIARA
Florida International Univ, Miami
Reply-to: erne...@cs.fiu.edu
Cell: 786-282-6783
On Oct 26, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
>
> I think ARIN is now doing sparse allocations on /28 boundaries.
Yes (two NANOG messages attached from earlier this month)
/John
Begin forwarded message:
> From: John Curran
> Date: October 18, 2010 2:55:49 PM EDT
> To: David Conrad
> Cc:
Also the FTC has set up a comprehensive site to protect kids, including a
guide for parents on kid's use of social networks.
http://www.onguardonline.gov/
Other places to look are http://www.safeinternet.org/ and
http://www.saferinternet.org/. Yes, these are different organis
On 27/10/10 3:01 PM, Joly MacFie wrote:
> Also the FTC has set up a comprehensive site to protect kids, including a
> guide for parents on kid's use of social networks.
>
> http://www.onguardonline.gov/
The Australian version has kids, parents and libraries as the primary focus:
http://www.cyber
19 matches
Mail list logo
