On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 09:34:40AM -0600, Danny McPherson wrote:
>
> On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:26 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> > On (2010-07-19 23:45 -0500), Brad Fleming wrote:
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> >> : for local rtbh
> >> : for local + remote rtbh
> >>
> >> I didn't have much reason fo
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>> Maybe they are having issues with their multicast mail routing protocol.
> Looks like their mmrpf (multicast mail reply path forwarding) is broken ;)
>
Or.. perhaps someone over there just
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Maybe they are having issues with their multicast mail routing protocol.
Looks like their mmrpf (multicast mail reply path forwarding) is broken ;)
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
On Jul 20, 2010, at 10:29 PM, Jay Mitchell wrote:
9 Copies here.
The headers seem to show a bit of bouncing around inside cisco.com
Maybe they are having issues with their multicast mail routing protocol.
Regards
Marshall
-Original Message-
From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:se...@rolle
9 Copies here.
The headers seem to show a bit of bouncing around inside cisco.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:se...@rollernet.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 July 2010 12:22 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Multicast Network Monitoring
>
> On 7/20/2010 06:11, Bran
On 7/20/2010 06:11, Brandon Kim wrote:
>
> Interesting question, I'd like to know more about this myself. I'm so used to
> monitoring SNMP-based
> devices, never really thought about multi-casts and being able to see the
> pattern/tree
>
>
Is it just me, or is anyone else receiving multi
On Monday, July 19, 2010 05:40:07 pm Akyol, Bora A wrote:
> Except that the goal you set below is very very hard to do on a software
> router unless its CPU has packet classification properties implemented in HW.
And then there are Systems on a Chip (SoC) like the Realtek 8650 that really
take i
Folks,
NANOG 50 is looming. If you have content you'd like to present, please go to
pc.nanog.org, create a username (if you don't have one), and upload your
materials.
Thanks,
Dave
(for the NANOG PC)
___
NANOG-announce mailing list
nanog-annou...@nano
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:59:13 -0400
Robert Sager wrote:
> Curious if anyone has any experience with tools specifically for
> monitoring multicast. Finds where the trees are, paths they are on,
> tracks all senders/receivers per group, handles PIM-SM, RPs, MSDP,
> MDT Tunnels over MPLS VPN, etc.
On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:26 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2010-07-19 23:45 -0500), Brad Fleming wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
>> : for local rtbh
>> : for local + remote rtbh
>>
>> I didn't have much reason for selecting other than it was easy
>> to identify visually. And obviously, I have
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:36:57 EDT, Marshall Eubanks said:
> None of this is going to help configure any routers.
Most people call a network of routers run in isolation, without any care or
consideration of the outside world and its potential impact on operations, a
"test lab". The occasional injec
Wow that looks great! The URL has an extra "dot" before the SHTML though when
you click on it.
Easy fix though. Are there no commercial applications for this kind of
monitoring?
I see your graphs are powered by MRTG. =)
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:39:17 +0300
Subject: Re: Multicast Network Mo
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Brandon Kim wrote:
>
> Interesting question, I'd like to know more about this myself. I'm so used
> to monitoring SNMP-based
> devices, never really thought about multi-casts and being able to see the
> pattern/tree
>
>
Shameless plug, I once developed a tool w
Interesting question, I'd like to know more about this myself. I'm so used to
monitoring SNMP-based
devices, never really thought about multi-casts and being able to see the
pattern/tree
> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:59:13 -0400
> Subject: Multicast Network Monitoring
> From: rjsa...@gmail
Curious if anyone has any experience with tools specifically for monitoring
multicast. Finds where the trees are, paths they are on, tracks all
senders/receivers per group, handles PIM-SM, RPs, MSDP, MDT Tunnels over
MPLS VPN, etc. Such as Cisco Multicast Manager, EMC Ionix Multicast
Manager, CA
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 05:21:31PM -0700, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> Burstnet huh? Somehow I am not surprised.
> Currently I have the below in my blocklists. Since this company
> facilitates spammers and other dubious activity and doesn't look
> like it hosts much legitimate content.
They've been do
If there is sufficient CPU power (and I/O to the CPU) as compared to the
bandwidth, then this is doable.
Tony
On Jul 19, 2010, at 11:40 PM, Akyol, Bora A wrote:
> Except that the goal you set below is very very hard to do on a software
> router unless its CPU has packet classification proper
Experts,
is there a standard comprising these 2 vendor specific implementations
of the ~same~ feature?
Thanks,
bit.
Registration is now open for the 50th Meeting of the North American Network
Operators' Group. NANOG 50 will be held October 3-6 in the new Loews Atlanta
Hotel in Midtown. The meeting will be hosted by Telx.
The meeting will be back-to-back with ARIN XXVI. A joint NANOG/ARIN program
will be pr
On (2010-07-19 23:45 -0500), Brad Fleming wrote:
Hey,
> : for local rtbh
> : for local + remote rtbh
>
> I didn't have much reason for selecting other than it was easy
> to identify visually. And obviously, I have safe-guards to not leak
> those communities into other networ
20 matches
Mail list logo
