Larry Sheldon writes:
>> The only response that works -- and even this is not guaranteed -- is
>> shunning.
>>
>> Drop the message. Do not respond. Ever.
>
> And for the love of Pete, when somebody (as I have) makes a mistake and
> does his bidding, tell the miscreant VIA PRIVATE EMAIL or a no
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, James Hess wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:59 PM, William Pitcock
> wrote:
> > For someone who is a CCNA, Mikrotik Certified Whatever, etc, etc, etc,
> > you really should know how to use dig(1).
>
> Certifications usually only suggest certain skills or knowl
[My apologies for spamming the list]
Seeing crazyness within AT&T network. Tier one circuit people are of no help as
circuits appear fine. I've talked to a number of Tier 1 techs today. The 138ms
at hot 5 must be a cross country bounce, but I am going from boi to sjc through
seattle.
Sporadica
Gang,
I've tried to get the attention of senderbase, which is claiming
activity from my address space which is in fact either un-routed or
within dynamic subscriber blocks that have outbound smtp filtering in
effect. Unfortunately, senderbase refuses to acknowledge the problem in
their dat
This report has been generated at Fri Apr 16 21:11:37 2010 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 08-Apr-10 -to- 15-Apr-10 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS23724 35122 3.4% 2.6 -- CHINANET-IDC-BJ-AP IDC, China
Telecommunications Corporation
On 4/16/10 11:28 AM, "Franck Martin" wrote:
> Would it not be time, to have the IPv6 equivalent of this table report?
>
> 5% of the Internet is IPv6, that's an interesting threshold that was just
> passed.
I think that time has come :)
Zaid
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
> Would it not be time, to have the IPv6 equivalent of this table report?
+1
It wold be nice to see how things gradually change as the 5% becomes larger.
Cheers
Jorge
Would it not be time, to have the IPv6 equivalent of this table report?
5% of the Internet is IPv6, that's an interesting threshold that was just
passed.
- Original Message -
From: "Routing Analysis Role Account"
To: ap...@apops.net, nanog@nanog.org, routing...@ripe.net, af...@afnog.org
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith .
Routing
Besides the Juniper specifics on which i do agree.
The fact that NetFlow v5 doesn't carry L2 information doesn't
per-se imply it can't be theorically applied to L2 interfaces
and report on upper layers - making it fair, on a multi-layer
thing. Which is the underlying issue here.
Cheers,
Paolo
O
> It is possible to get cflow working in a L2 way ?
Hi Giuliano,
The short answer is, unfortunately, no.
NetFlow v5 does not have any fields for Layer 2 information:
http://netflow.caligare.com/netflow_v5.htm
Although NetFlow v9 does have such fields, you (a) only get NetFlow v9
functionality
On Thursday 15 April 2010 05:05:05 pm Bill Lewis wrote:
> Since I'm told that DSL aggregation / mux is currently not possible, we
> are looking at doing stream splitting via a technology like FatPipe
> uses. Anyone have this in production usage? Or something similar?
No IMA over DSL? (IMA = Inver
I'd like to see the actual benchmarks. Something similar to
routerperformance.pdf spreadsheet, but something more recent. Seems like
those resources are alone available for partners.
I've been following this thread, but no one has pointed out any
documentation yet. Just speculation and personal exp
On 16/04/2010 16:48, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> the cx4 interface is xaui 4x3Gb/s, as is xenpack. xfp is xfi 1 x 10Gb/s
> so connecting the two requires a serdes device.
you're mixing up interfaces here. This is certainly true of the electrical
interface between transceiver and transceiver port. Howe
On 04/16/2010 08:53 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 04/16/2010 08:35 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, William Jobs wrote:
>>>
Has anyone else undertaken a similar setup? What were the difficulties
you
enc
On Thursday 15 April 2010 04:59:19 pm William Pitcock wrote:
> For someone who is a CCNA, Mikrotik Certified Whatever, etc, etc, etc,
> you really should know how to use dig(1).
Which IOS or RouterOS has that command?
Now, if the list included RHCE
As James said, certifications are pretty na
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
On 04/16/2010 08:35 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, William Jobs wrote:
Has anyone else undertaken a similar setup? What were the difficulties
you
encountered especially in terms of reduced throughput, packet loss
etc. Any
recommen
People,
Good afternoon,
We have a curious situation in a client's environment.
It has a M7i router with 2 IQ2E (4 GE) PICs.
It wants one of its PICs plugged into a L2 switch (802.1Q Trunk Mode)
and the another one plugged (via 1 giga of 4 ports only) to another L2
switch.
M7i
On 04/16/2010 08:35 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, William Jobs wrote:
>
>> Has anyone else undertaken a similar setup? What were the difficulties
>> you
>> encountered especially in terms of reduced throughput, packet loss
>> etc. Any
>> recommended media converters?
>
>
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, William Jobs wrote:
Has anyone else undertaken a similar setup? What were the difficulties you
encountered especially in terms of reduced throughput, packet loss etc. Any
recommended media converters?
Why media converter? There are CX4 XFPs as far as I can google...
--
Mi
Hi,
I need to connect a router and a server over 10G. The router has a XFP
interface and the server has a CX4 interface.
Has anyone else undertaken a similar setup? What were the difficulties you
encountered especially in terms of reduced throughput, packet loss etc. Any
recommended media convert
We are getting multiple reports of packet loss in Sprint Network in Saint Louis
which appears to be affecting some of our VPNs. Anyone seeing similar issues?
Internet Health Report not showing recent issues.
Chris Patterson, CCNA
Support Manager
Rapid Systems
Original Message -
From: "Bill Stewart"
To: "Tony Varriale"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: Router for Metro Ethernet
That's the spec sheet, and that's for straight forwarding.
If you want to do much of anything else at all with the router,
Cisco has anothe
In the April 2010 edition of Geoff Huston's ISOC ISP Column he
reports that the extent of full end-to-end IPv6 capability in today’s
Internet is now at a level of 5% of all end systems. This number is
now at a level where IPv6 deployment is now passing from mere
statistical interest to mainstream
25 matches
Mail list logo
