Re: My email recived in incorrect date by hotmail

On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:17:27 EST, "Tarig Y. Adam" said: > Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:23:03 -0800 > Wed, 3 Feb 2010 01:00:51 +0300 (EAT) > > Tue, 2 Feb 2010 17:00:51 -0500 (EST) What's wrong here? Different timezones in different parts of the world. It was 2PM Tuesday on the US West Coast, 5PM on US E

Re: My email recived in incorrect date by hotmail

At 01:17 03/02/2010 -0500, Tarig Y. Adam wrote: Your local PC has the date set incorrectly as Feb 3 rather than March 3. -Hank Hi all I notice all messages received by hotmail have wrong date header. for example I sent a message at "2 Feb 2010 01:00:51 +03",but hotmail display completely di

My email recived in incorrect date by hotmail

Hi all I notice all messages received by hotmail have wrong date header. for example I sent a message at "2 Feb 2010 01:00:51 +03",but hotmail display completely different. mail.suin.edu.sd (DeskNow) is ours. Below headers captured by hotmail. Received: from mail.suin.edu.sd ([196.29.170.205]) b

Re: Is there a gmail SMTP expert in the house?

On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:17:18 EST, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu said: > Gmail just bounced some mail to the RFC822 From: address rather than the > RFC821 MAIL FROM:. And http://mail.google.com/support/ won't let you > report a problem unless you have a gmail account. Due to an off-list reply, it's bee

SNMP, Static NAT and management systems including servers midwear and applications

Hi All: I have been asked to extend the capabilities of my current monitoring and management system to another division of the company. All IP space is rfc1918 with no public routed space in the mix. Needless to say, and rightfully so, the network folks won't allow me to directly attach my manag

Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)

On Mar 3, 2010, at 6:38 AM, Leen Besselink wrote: > >>> Not comparing this to the former-DDR or Chinese situation (please refer >>> to my tin-foil remark above) a per-country specific prefix is not >>> necessarily a bad thing and may even have an upside. >>> >>> >> Care to explain what tha

Is there a gmail SMTP expert in the house?

Gmail just bounced some mail to the RFC822 From: address rather than the RFC821 MAIL FROM:. And http://mail.google.com/support/ won't let you report a problem unless you have a gmail account. pgptLxrMlfcMI.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)

just to undermine the ITU's (only) point, why don't we simply have IANA delegate lets say 25% of the available ipv6 space to AFRINIC and APNIC now, like, -now- already... if they're so concerned about the "developing countries" surely, most of them would be in those regions :P and that should

Re: Anyone seeing any issues in LA area with XO?

Confirmed major outage with XO- Master ticket 2041432. We lost a T1 to San Fernando, but one to Anaheim is still up. The tech I spoke with said they have something like 15 COs offline. On 3/2/10 3:24 PM, Raj Singh wrote: We just lost all our Santa Monica links with XO. Anyone else seeing this

RE: Anyone seeing any issues in LA area with XO?

We've been seeing issues with our XO connection in L.A as well. Mobile email powered by the force... Original Message From: "Carlos Alcantar" Date: 3/2/10 4:28 pm To: "Raj Singh" ; "NANOG" Subj: RE: Anyone seeing any issues in LA area with XO? I have 3 t1's that went down in the

RE: Anyone seeing any issues in LA area with XO?

I have 3 t1's that went down in the santa monica area at 1:47pm pst all off he same hub ds3. Carlos Alcantar Race Telecommunications, Inc. 101 Haskins Way South San Francisco, CA 94080 P: 650.649.3550 x143 F: 650.649.3551 E: car...@race.com -Original Message- From: Raj Singh [mailto:ra

L.A Network Outages today,

Sorry if this is better handled by outages, but anyone in the L.A area have an idea about the network/phone outages today in L.A? We've seen issues with x.o, but not sure of the full scope. Thanks. Mobile email powered by the force...

Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)

On 03/02/2010 11:46 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: Care to explain what that could possibly be? (I simply don't see an upside to making it easy to censor the internet by national identity). Maintenance of "GeoIP"-databases becomes easier and less error-prone ? Possible less out of date becau

Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)

>> Care to explain what that could possibly be? (I simply don't see an >> upside to making it easy to censor the internet by national identity). > > Maintenance of "GeoIP"-databases becomes easier and less error-prone ? > > Possible less out of date because of it. > > We've seen complaints about th

Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)

Not comparing this to the former-DDR or Chinese situation (please refer to my tin-foil remark above) a per-country specific prefix is not necessarily a bad thing and may even have an upside. Care to explain what that could possibly be? (I simply don't see an upside to making it easy to c

Anyone seeing any issues in LA area with XO?

We just lost all our Santa Monica links with XO. Anyone else seeing this? Thanks, Raj Singh |Director Network Engineering _ Demand Media | eNom, Inc. Direct: 425.974.4679 15801 NE 24th St. Bellevue, WA 98008 raj.si...@demandmedia.com

Re: Locations with no good Internet (was ISP in Johannesburg)

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Michael Sokolov wrote: > That got me thinking: ISDN/IDSL and T1 can be extended infinitely far > into the boondocks because those signal formats support repeaters.  What > I'm wondering is how can we do the same thing with SDSL - and I mean > politically rather tha

Re: Locations with no good Internet (was ISP in Johannesburg)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joel Jaeggli wrote: > On 03/01/2010 05:34 PM, Akyol, Bora A wrote: >> Michael >> > > point-to-point and ptmp 802.11phy derived tdm gear has been > outperforming cellular access layers on the throughput and cost > equations for a number of years. Ye

Re: 1.0.0.0/8 route from MERIT ?

I'm sorry my RR update was ... too late? Did this cause a problem for someone? --N (AS36561) On Mar 2, 2010, at 7:28, Larry Blunk wrote: Christopher Morrow wrote: On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Tomoya Yoshida wrote: Thank you Geoff. I asked because I could see 1/8 of merit AS237

Re: 1.0.0.0/8 route from MERIT ?

Christopher Morrow wrote: On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Tomoya Yoshida wrote: Thank you Geoff. I asked because I could see 1/8 of merit AS237 but couldn't see of origin AS36561 for those two in database. Even if it's an experiment and sort term, It's better to be registerd in right origi

Re: 1.0.0.0/8 route from MERIT ?

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Tomoya Yoshida wrote: > Thank you Geoff. > > I asked because I could see 1/8 of merit AS237 but couldn't see > of origin AS36561 for those two in database. > Even if it's an experiment and sort term, It's better to be registerd > in right origin I think. # It could

Re: hotmail help

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Matt Kelly wrote: > Anyone from hotmail on the list that can contact me please?  We're having a > widespread issue. Is this an issue with delivery, abuse, network issues, other? You need to be more specific -- Hotmail's a big place :) --Jaren

Re: 1.0.0.0/8 route from MERIT ?

Thank you Geoff. I asked because I could see 1/8 of merit AS237 but couldn't see of origin AS36561 for those two in database. Even if it's an experiment and sort term, It's better to be registerd in right origin I think. # It could be guessed but... When RPKI comes, is it no problem?? -t

Re: 1.0.0.0/8 route from MERIT ?

Hi, As I noted in the previous note quoted below, APNIC are undertaking a second experiment with these two /24 routes originated by AS 36561. These two /24s appear to be the major attractors in the 1.0.0.0/8 space. YouTube have generously provided assistance for this second experiment, and we a

Re: 1.0.0.0/8 route from MERIT ?

Are these from youtube also? 1.1.1.0/24 *[BGP/170] 07:04:22, MED 0, localpref 100 AS path: 2914 3356 36561 I 1.2.3.0/24 *[BGP/170] 07:01:21, MED 0, localpref 100 AS path: 2914 3356 36561 I tomoya On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:34:02 +1