On Feb 5, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM, David Birnbaum
wrote:
We have noticed a lot of issues with Asterisk 1.2 and some 1.4
rollouts.
FreePBX had some truck-sized holes in it.
Most/all of the big issues that existed in previous version of
Asterisk
In message <6eb799ab1002061452s51f9cf61p303d36130291...@mail.gmail.com>, James
Hess writes:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:15 AM, wrote:
> >> > And now for the trick question. =A0Is :::077.077.077.077 a legal
> >> > mapped address and if it, does it match 077.077.077.077?
>
> Wasn't there an
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:15 AM, wrote:
>> > And now for the trick question. Is :::077.077.077.077 a legal
>> > mapped address and if it, does it match 077.077.077.077?
Wasn't there an internet draft on that subject, recently?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representa
> Yes this is a huge security hole. Management networks should always be
> restricted to some extent and the fact that default passwords allow you into
> VoIP gateways provides an avenue for call fraud. At a very minimum the
> devices should restrict which addresses can talk to them (ie. managemen
Folks,
Thanks for all the comments on the IPv6 regex...
-
Jeroen Massar wrote:
The only proper way of "testing" if an address is a valid IPv6 address
is to feed it to getaddrinfo() and then use it through that API.
Good point. One of the reasons to do this was for environments where
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Martin Hannigan
wrote:
> Honestly? A spreadsheet will do it.
Let me translate that into plain English for you.
He said that a "barebones database" will do it and he happens to use a
simple one that he built himself.
Clearly there are scaling issues with his techno
Big Brother is watching you! so last year!
True, but the lawfull intercept has been around for a while, active/passive
flow tap monitoring, port mirroring , called ID spoofing ...i also saw an
update on the IOS/Junos roadmpap not that long ago. the 7600 has been around
for a while now and s
Gurus,
Where I work we ship our own gear.
That being said, we've run out of 1U shipping boxes for cisco gear.
I've searched the list archives, uline, as well as a few other
shipping material websites and cannot find an acceptable shipping box
with foam inserts.
I would like a corrugated cardboard
Gurus,
Where I work we ship our own gear.
That being said, we've run out of 1U shipping boxes for cisco gear.
I've searched the list archives, uline, as well as a few other
shipping material websites and cannot find an acceptable shipping box
with foam inserts.
I would like a corrugated cardboard
Hi Jared,
Merit would be happy to sink and collected this traffic. Perhaps even the
entire /8
depending on the traffic level. Ideally we would want to do the entire /8.
We have disk and bandwidth in place for our other research activities and this
would
fit in nicely. We could probably do a
Hello nanog,
I was pointed to the recent thread about Google Groups spammers and
thought I'd throw out a few comments. Keeping Google free of spam, and
keeping the wider internet community on our side is important to us.
By the time I looked at it, the account named by Jim was already shut
down a
On 2/6/2010 8:12 AM, Mark Smith wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:22:23 -0600
Larry Sheldon wrote:
Present the cost and the plan in a public forum or widely distributed
memorandum (including as a minimum everybody that was at the meeting and
everybody in the chain(s) of command between you and th
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:22:23 -0600
Larry Sheldon wrote:
> On 2/4/2010 5:13 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
> > On 2/4/2010 3:30 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> >>
> >> A recent organizational change at my company has put someone in charge
> >> who is determined to make things perfect. We are a service provider
13 matches
Mail list logo
