Daniel Senie wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
>
>> For me, the entire debate boils down to this question.
>>
>> What should the objective be, decades or centuries?
>
> If centuries, how many planets and moons will the address space
> cover? (If we as a species manages to
Hola Nanog:
So after many years of a hiatus from Linux, I recently dropped XP in favour
of Fedora. Now that my happy windows blinders are off, I see alarming
things. Ugly ssh brute force, DNS server IP spoofing with scans and typical
script kiddie tactics.
What are the new set of best practice
ARIN is pleased to offer a Meetings Fellowship Program to bring new
voices and ideas to public policy discussions. This call is for Fellows
to attend ARIN XXV in Toronto, Canada 18-21 April 2010. If you are
interested in participating in the program, submit your application by
19 February. The appl
_ssl_web_attack/
http://www.shadowserver.org/wiki/pmwiki.php/Calendar/20100129
Maybe that has something to do with this ?
Hope you have a nice weekend.
rob...@robert ~
$ curl -i -G www.bankofamerica.com
HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
Server: Sun-ONE-Web-Server/6.1
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:25:08 GMT
Content-len
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Igor Gashinsky wrote:
> 1) ping-ponging of packets on Sonet/SDH links
> 2) ping sweep of death
...
> For most people, using /127's will be a lot operationaly easier then
> maintain those crazy ACLs, but, like I said before, YMMV..
I'm in the /112 camp - it's not g
This report has been generated at Fri Jan 29 21:11:29 2010 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 21-Jan-10 -to- 28-Jan-10 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS268621921 2.1% 139.6 -- AT&T Global Network Services -
EMEA
2 - AS18170 2
Looks like it may be a BoA issue. I also see their AS number peering to
AS 701 (Verizon Business / UUNet) with a dead traceroute to BoA.
On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:22 PM, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
> Anyone see any connectivity issues with Level-3 in the DC area? This
issue is causing big late
John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
> Anyone see any connectivity issues with Level-3 in the DC area? This
> issue is causing big latency problems
> that appeared to have taken out Bank of America's website.
>
Los angeles Downtown had a big power outage which affected quite a few dc's
dont know if its
Looks like an internal problem to BoA. The redirect works, and I get an
immediate reply. The https redirect page appears boinked. Even with a -k
curl took over 30 seconds to get the page, and the browser would have timed
out.
rob...@robert ~
$ curl -i -G www.bankofamerica.com
HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Pe
I've got low latency TO 'Level3 Washington' - but I time out about three hops
later. I'm coming from the Sprintlink.
On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:22 PM, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
> Anyone see any connectivity issues with Level-3 in the DC area? This issue is
> causing big latency problems
> th
Anyone see any connectivity issues with Level-3 in the DC area? This issue is
causing big latency problems
that appeared to have taken out Bank of America's website.
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith .
Routing
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 18:36 -0500, Steven Bellovin wrote:
> Actually, it's not at all surprising, but it depends on the UART or
> equivalent.
and the dynamic characteristics of the power rails, to a certain extent.
Sun kit is quite sensitive to this sort of thing.
Zonker has a good guide to what
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:50:22 EST, Steven Bellovin said:
> In all seriousness, will any attempt be made to select trial applicants
> based on (apparent) clue level and/or to receive feedback through
> channels other than the usual Tier 1 support?
Two comments:
1) People who manage to find out abou
15 matches
Mail list logo
