On 02/01/2010 00:24, ML wrote:
> Pardon my ignorance in this area but is too much to ask for OTDR data
> before signing contracts? In addition to data on the make of the fiber
> if you wanted to do xWDM in the future.
fibre grade / quality, absolutely. otdr is difficult, because fibre
providers
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 7:24 PM, ML wrote:
> Pardon my ignorance in this area but is too much to ask for OTDR data before
> signing contracts? In addition to data on the make of the fiber if you
> wanted to do xWDM in the future.
Yes, it's too much to ask. They won't splice your path until you si
On 1/1/2010 5:52 PM, Mike wrote:
I am looking at the possibility of leasing a ~70 mile run of fiber. I
don't have access to any mid point section for regeneration purposes,
and so I am wondering what the chances that a 120km rated SFP would be
able to light the path and provide stable connectivit
On Friday 01 January 2010 23:19:30 Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 02:52:33PM -0800, Mike wrote:
> > I am looking at the possibility of leasing a ~70 mile run of fiber. I
> > don't have access to any mid point section for regeneration purposes,
> > and so I am wondering what
On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 02:52:33PM -0800, Mike wrote:
> I am looking at the possibility of leasing a ~70 mile run of fiber. I
> don't have access to any mid point section for regeneration purposes,
> and so I am wondering what the chances that a 120km rated SFP would be
> able to light the path
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010, Mike wrote:
I am looking at the possibility of leasing a ~70 mile run of fiber. I don't
have access to any mid point section for regeneration purposes, and so I am
wondering what the chances that a 120km rated SFP would be able to light the
path and provide stable connectiv
I am looking at the possibility of leasing a ~70 mile run of fiber. I
don't have access to any mid point section for regeneration purposes,
and so I am wondering what the chances that a 120km rated SFP would be
able to light the path and provide stable connectivity. There are a lot
of unknowns
> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:16:31 +
> From: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com
>
> It would help if the BIND EDNS0 negotiation would not fall back to
> the 512 byte limit - perhaps you could talk with the ISC developers
> about that.
i don't agree that your proposed change would h
On 1/1/10 4:44 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
...
it's going to be another game of chicken -- will the people who build and/or
deploy such crapware lose their jobs, or will ICANN back down from DNSSEC?
Either (a) a large cohort of entries is added to the root before [pick
predicate condition of choice
> > Couldn't PBB or even Q-in-Q provide that isolation as well, at least for
> > point-to-point services? I must say that I don't personally have much
> > experience with those, because we tend to connect our customers to
> > EoMPLS-capable routers directly.
> QinQ does nothing to reduce the numbe
On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 09:44:13PM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
> Jason Bertoch writes:
>
> >> Dec 31 10:12:37 linux-1ij2 named[14306]: too many timeouts resolving
> >> 'XXX.YYY.ZZZ/A' (in 'YYY.ZZZ'?): disabling EDNS
> >
> > Do you have a firewall in front of this server that limits DNS packets to
>
This report has been generated at Fri Jan 1 21:11:45 2010 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 24-Dec-09 -to- 31-Dec-09 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS638925484 2.4% 6.1 -- BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK -
BellSouth.net Inc.
2 - AS17974
Jason Bertoch writes:
>> Dec 31 10:12:37 linux-1ij2 named[14306]: too many timeouts resolving
>> 'XXX.YYY.ZZZ/A' (in 'YYY.ZZZ'?): disabling EDNS
>
> Do you have a firewall in front of this server that limits DNS packets to
> 512 bytes?
statistically speaking, yes, most people have that. which i
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith .
Routing
[ (Non-cross)posted to NANOG, PPML, RIPE IPv6 wg, Dutch IPv6 TF. Web version
for the monospace font impaired and with some links:
http://www.bgpexpert.com/addrspace2009.php ]
2009 IPv4 Address Use Report
As of January first, 2010, the number of unused IPv4 addresses is 722.18
million. On Januar
Linen,
> As far as I'm concerned, enterprises should just connect their various
sites to the Internet independently, and use VPN
> techniques if and where necessary to provide the illusion of a unified
network. In practice, this illusion of a single
> large LAN (or rather, multiple organization
17 matches
Mail list logo
