Only thing I know is that as I was walking home, I saw a Level 3 van
with an open
manhole cover outside the front of the Tribeca Grand (a block from 32
Ave of A)..
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Peter Beckman wrote:
> Anyone know anything? Has happened twice today, right now, and between
> 12:2
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Mark Urbach wrote:
> Anyone have a good solution to get "accurate" speed results when testing at
> 10/100/1000 Ethernet speeds?
>
> Do you have a server/software that customer can test too?
One wonders how netnod does this... I believe they put in some servers
spe
Anyone know anything? Has happened twice today, right now, and between
12:22pm and 12:49pm (at least same symptoms as this issue)
Packets Pings
HostLoss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst
StDev
1. 208.72
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:30:18PM -1000, Michael Painter wrote:
> Nathan Ward wrote:
> >On 3/11/2009, at 10:56 AM, Mark Urbach wrote:
> >
> >>Anyone have a good solution to get "accurate" speed results when
> >>testing at 10/100/1000 Ethernet speeds?
>
> An NDT server?... such as:
> http://ndt.an
Nathan Ward wrote:
On 3/11/2009, at 10:56 AM, Mark Urbach wrote:
Anyone have a good solution to get "accurate" speed results when
testing at 10/100/1000 Ethernet speeds?
An NDT server?... such as:
http://ndt.anl.gov:7123/
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:56:56PM -0600, Mark Urbach wrote:
> Anyone have a good solution to get "accurate" speed results when
> testing at 10/100/1000 Ethernet speeds?
iperf. Check
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog43/abstracts.php?pt=MjkmbmFub2c0Mw==&nm=nanog43
and
http:/
I use iperf with packet capture on both sides, then analyze the packet
capture for per-second throughput and re-transmits. I usually do 10
TCP streams for 30 seconds.
Note that on GigE with significant RTTs (5-15 ms) some TCP tuning is
needed to deal with the bandwidth delay product. It is also po
perfsonar livecd offers npad service that remote hosts can connect and
see the performance and results.
http://www.internet2.edu/performance/toolkit/index.html
TcpOptimizer helps tunning the tcp/ip for windows systems.
http://www.speedguide.net/downloads.php
nuttcp is good to generate packets/s
On 3/11/2009, at 10:56 AM, Mark Urbach wrote:
Anyone have a good solution to get "accurate" speed results when
testing at 10/100/1000 Ethernet speeds?
If you want accuracy, you want to buy a packet generator/router tester
unit.
I just built a tool for a customer (a last-mile network provi
iperf is fairly standard and supports some handy features -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iperf
-Jack Carrozzo
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Mark Urbach wrote:
> Anyone have a good solution to get "accurate" speed results when testing at
> 10/100/1000 Ethernet speeds?
>
> Do you have a server/
Anyone have a good solution to get "accurate" speed results when testing at
10/100/1000 Ethernet speeds?
Do you have a server/software that customer can test too?
Thanks,
Mark Urbach
PinPoint Communications, Inc.
100 N. 12th St Suite 500
Lincoln, NE 68508
402-438-6211 ext 1923 Office
402-66
(Apologies for top-replying, but hey, it makes it easier to ignore stuff you've
already read.)
I think the main things to consider in identifying what things "belong" in a
standardized community are:
- is it something that is really global, and not local, in behaviour and scope?
- is it somethin
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:38:00PM -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
> Communities (except the standardized well known ones) are extremely
> diverse. For those that support even more granular traffic engineering
> by limiting which of their peers your routes might be transiting, I
> believe there are 2 d
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
more accessible and therefore more likely to be used, I don't think
traffic engineering is something I particularly want to encourage to
excess but RTBH is a know that more people need access to quite frankly.
I think creating a standard or at least a template might push mor
Jack Bates wrote:
> Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>>
>> A standardized set means it can be cooked into documentation, training,
>> and potentially even products.
>>
>
> Communities (except the standardized well known ones) are extremely
> diverse. For those that support even more granular traffic engineer
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
A standardized set means it can be cooked into documentation, training,
and potentially even products.
Communities (except the standardized well known ones) are extremely
diverse. For those that support even more granular traffic engineering
by limiting which of their pe
So this questions we have approached from time to time. Is there some
worth to be had in finding some consensus (assuming such a thing is
possible) on a subset of the features that people use communities for
that could be standardized? particularly in the context of source based
remote triggered b
The juniper pr event at the nyse actually contained some not
unreasonable information on their new silicon.
starts about 25 minutes in (silly registration required)...
http://www.thenewnetworkishere.com/simulcast.html
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> As Louis Mamakos pointed out back in 1992 or so, it's hard to conceal the
>> existence of said peering:
>
> g2 is raising the cost of gaining info. you can not prevent it
> absolutely.
No kidding--the traffic backlog on it this morning was hor
On Nov 2, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
But seriously now, the reason we have these squishy things taking up
space between our ears in the first place is so we can come up with
new
ideas and better ways to solve our problems.
and they need not be cute, clever, or complex. unless we d
> As Louis Mamakos pointed out back in 1992 or so, it's hard to conceal the
> existence of said peering:
g2 is raising the cost of gaining info. you can not prevent it
absolutely.
randy
Friends don't let friends drink and reply-all.
I'm just sayin.
-j
--Original Message--
From: Richard A Steenbergen
To: Steve Bertrand
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Small guys with BGP issues
Sent: Nov 1, 2009 11:07 PM
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 11:54:07PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> I'm
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 05:19:32AM -0500, Randy Bush wrote:
>> i try to use as few tricks, knobs, and clever things as possible and
>> still get my job done. i try to be extremely conscious of, and minimal,
>> when what i am doing effects or is visible to my neighbor
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Richard A Steenbergen
wrote:
> But seriously now, the reason we have these squishy things taking up
> space between our ears in the first place is so we can come up with new
> ideas and better ways to solve our problems. Obviously you can take it
> too far, I'm su
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 05:19:32AM -0500, Randy Bush wrote:
> i try to use as few tricks, knobs, and clever things as possible and
> still get my job done. i try to be extremely conscious of, and minimal,
> when what i am doing effects or is visible to my neighbors and/or the
> global net.
>
>
>>> i would rather earn it by designing things, not by cleaning up messes
>>> made by kiddies needing to show off.
>
> For those who try their best, given your comment, what in the fsck is
> one to do?
[ i prefer to speak in the first person, not tell you what you should
do. ]
i try to use as
26 matches
Mail list logo
