Hi,
it seems, that hotmail send a bare LF in the added signature
(and violates RFC).
qmail drops the connection afterwards:
451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html
no helpfull response from hotmail:
https://windowslivehelp.com/community/t/121824.aspx
Kind regards,
Ingo Flaschberger
Obviously not as good a solution as having Hotmail fix their issue, but the
fixcrio application (http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/fixcrio.html) is designed to
correct this particular issue.
I have always thought it funny that DJB has a stance of "strict compliance
sending, loose acceptance receive" in hi
On 10/08/2009 04:54 PM, Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
Hi,
it seems, that hotmail send a bare LF in the added signature
(and violates RFC).
qmail drops the connection afterwards:
451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html
no helpfull response from hotmail:
https://windowslivehelp.com/community/t
Hi,
it seems, that hotmail send a bare LF in the added signature
(and violates RFC).
qmail drops the connection afterwards:
451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html
no helpfull response from hotmail:
https://windowslivehelp.com/community/t/121824.aspx
Kind regards,
Ingo Flaschbe
Gadi Evron wrote:
[snip]
This will be an interesting phenomenon to watch. If it is successful
perhaps it could work here too."
Comcast is launching a trial on Thursday of a new automated service that will warn broadband customers of possible virus
infections, if the computers are behaving as i
Looks like ISP-to-customer notification of possible infection is starting
on Comcast in the US now.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-10370996-245.html
---
Peter Beckman Inter
Hi Eric,
.-- My secret spy satellite informs me that at Thu, 08 Oct 2009, Eric Gearhart
wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing general routing weirdness on the Internets, or at
> least can someone point me at a good "BGP dashboard" site that monitors the
> state of routing tables at various places?
I h
I know this post sounds like a noobish thing to ask, but I've got sites in
three different cities - Tucson, Arizona; Devnver, Colorado and Salt Lake
City, Utah, and all three of them can't reach certain IPs of our clients
whom we have IPsec tunnels to. In one case I can traceroute to 4.2.2.2 fine,
Devangnp wrote:
Does Juniper firewall has same issue?
Nope. Just that you need to get an ISG 1000 or ISG 2000 to be able to
virtualize nowadays, as the old lower model NetScreen boxes are no
longer up for sale.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Philip Lavine wrote:
> Anyone know a good DC on England that caters to financial industry clients?
Have a look at Telecity* too, DCs in London, Manchester and Dublin,
others spread out over Europe. Not just colo but a bunch of services
too if you need them. They
On 08/10/09 11:46 +0100, Michael Dillon wrote:
There seems to be a variance between "It's OK to just give out a /64" to
"You better be thinking about giving out a /48". I can live in those
boundaries and am most likely fine with either. I'm leaning toward a /56
for regular subscribers and a /48 o
Philip-
I'm only really familiar with my employer's facilities: Savvis has
data centers in London, Slough, and Reading with good exchange
connectivity*. There is a financial-firm oriented microsite at http://financial.savvis.net/
, but beware the annoying* embedded video. You can look at htt
> Sorry to be a curmudgeon and let me play devil's advocate for a minute. I
> realize that the address space is enormous; gigantic, even, but if we treat
> it as cavalierly as you all are proposing, it will get used up. If its
> treated like an infinite resource that will never, ever be used up
And I will play devil's advocate to the devil's advocate ... wait, does that
make me God's advocate? Nice!
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Curtis Maurand wrote:
>
> Sorry to be a curmudgeon and let me play devil's advocate for a minute. I
> realize that the address space is enormous; giganti
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:24:30AM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
>
> Sorry to be a curmudgeon and let me play devil's advocate for a minute.
> I realize that the address space is enormous; gigantic, even, but if we
> treat it as cavalierly as you all are proposing, it will get used up.
> If it
Sorry to be a curmudgeon and let me play devil's advocate for a minute.
I realize that the address space is enormous; gigantic, even, but if we
treat it as cavalierly as you all are proposing, it will get used up.
If its treated like an infinite resource that will never, ever be used
up as
> There seems to be a variance between "It's OK to just give out a /64" to
> "You better be thinking about giving out a /48". I can live in those
> boundaries and am most likely fine with either. I'm leaning toward a /56
> for regular subscribers and a /48 only for business or large scale
> custome
> I would disagree. IPv6 is designed around class boundaries which, in my
> understanding, are:
>
> A layer two network gets assigned a /64
> A customer gets assigned a /48
A "site" gets assigned a /48. It could be a customer site, or one of
your many sites
or one of a customer's many sites. I int
Simon Lockhart wrote:
> On Wed Oct 07, 2009 at 02:33:33PM -0700, Philip Lavine wrote:
>
>> Anyone know a good DC on England that caters to financial industry clients?
>>
>
> Telehouse London started as a Banking DR centre, so would probably meet your
> needs. Otherwise, there's Interxion, w
19 matches
Mail list logo
