Martin Hannigan wrote:
> The only question I have is a context switch. Why Mogadishu? Do the (sea)
> pirates need more capacity to manage their ship hijacking business?
Because ethiopia is the effectively land-locked economic power in the
neighborhood and it needs diverse landing sites. Also I
On 11/08/2009 00:24, Martin Hannigan wrote:
The only question I have is a context switch. Why Mogadishu? Do the (sea)
pirates need more capacity to manage their ship hijacking business?
The indications are that Somalia has been improving over the past year
or two. If this continues, then it m
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> americans are a bit naive about the rest of the world
Not the Americans who provided a large chunk of capital and are managing
SEACOM.
Short summary:
The operator is anticipating that South Africa and Kenya alone are going to
utilize 85%
Luke S Crawford wrote:
1. are there people who apply pressure to ISPs to get them to shut down
botnets, like maps did for spam?
Hi, Luke! MAAWG recently published a document to help ISPs deal with
infected machines in their networks. It's not the same kind of pressure,
but (as we learned w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p47m5XVt4WQ
Time for another interview. Martin Levy talks about his experiences,
what kind of customers they cater to, what worked and what didn't work
during deployment, and what internal strategy they had.
We recorded an interview with the Swedish government
This was responded to on the DNSEXT mailing list.
Sorry, but your question was accidentally attributed to Paul who
forwarded the message.
DNSEXT Archive: http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/
-Doug
>Why do you think this might be? Fear of (extralegal) retaliation by
>botnet owners? or fear of getting sued by listed network owners?
[TLB:] No more than any anti-spam RBL
or
>is
>the idea (shunning packets from ISPs that host botnets) fundamentally
>unsound?
>
[TLB:] That's an ongoing ragi
[Followups set to futures as organization discussion.]
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 08:13:55AM -0400, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> >above link, and routing, at transport, there is a tld effort as well.
> >
> >Randy Bush wrote:
> >>yes. informally, a fair number of nan
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:49:51PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/10/business/global/10cable.html
>
> if seacom completes, and it is looking likely (yay!), this will be great.
> but
>
> Alan Mauldin, research director at TeleGeography, a telecommunications
> m
> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/10/business/global/10cable.html
if seacom completes, and it is looking likely (yay!), this will be great.
but
Alan Mauldin, research director at TeleGeography, a telecommunications
market research company, said Africa was the last major area where
broa
On Aug 10, 2009, at 5:34 AM, Nathan Ward wrote:
On 10/08/2009, at 8:11 PM, goe...@anime.net wrote:
such a list would include all of chinanet and france telecom. it
would likely not last long.
You've mentioned France twice now. Is there a big botnet problem
there? I've never heard of anyt
On that note, folks might want to see
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/10/business/global/10cable.html
Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
above link, and routing, at transport, there is a tld effort as well.
Randy Bush wrote:
yes. informally, a fair number of nanogians have spent the last few
decades doing tech transfer to the developing economies, including
helping start sister groups such as afnog.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Franklin wrote:
>> Is anyone else that uses ServerBeach hosting having issues with their name
>> servers (ns[12].geodns.net) failing to resolve their hostnames?
>
> I haven't seen any recent problems, although I have the geodns servers slaving
> f
On 10/08/2009, at 8:11 PM, goe...@anime.net wrote:
such a list would include all of chinanet and france telecom. it
would likely not last long.
You've mentioned France twice now. Is there a big botnet problem
there? I've never heard of anything like that.
I'll admit I don't follow this area
> Is anyone else that uses ServerBeach hosting having issues with their name
> servers (ns[12].geodns.net) failing to resolve their hostnames?
I haven't seen any recent problems, although I have the geodns servers slaving
from my server. Are you doing the same, or generating DNS directly on their
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Luke S Crawford wrote:
goe...@anime.net writes:
On Fri, 8 Aug 2009, Luke S Crawford wrote:
1. are there people who apply pressure to ISPs to get them to shut down
botnets, like maps did for spam?
sadly no.
...
Why do you think this might be? Fear of (extralegal) retalia
goe...@anime.net writes:
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2009, Luke S Crawford wrote:
> > 1. are there people who apply pressure to ISPs to get them to shut down
> > botnets, like maps did for spam?
>
> sadly no.
...
Why do you think this might be? Fear of (extralegal) retaliation by
botnet owners? or fear o
18 matches
Mail list logo
