Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / ApplicationMonitoring

In that case might as well include Carp, vrrp, fping as well --Original Message-- From: Roland Dobbins To: NANOG list Subject: Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / ApplicationMonitoring Sent: Jul 21, 2009 21:42 On Jul 22, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Stefan wrote: > WebNM + Denik

Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring

On Jul 22, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Stefan wrote: WebNM + Denika + Logalot - set of tools nfdump/nfsen, Stager, RANCID, RCS, CVS, or Subversion - these should all be included in any list of useful open-source tools for network operators, IMHO. ---

Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring

WebNM + Denika + Logalot - set of tools -- ***Stefan Mititelu http://twitter.com/netfortius http://www.linkedin.com/in/netfortius On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Matthew Huff wrote: > I'm putting together a list of NMS systems for system (hardware,

RE: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Drew Weaver wrote: I'm probably wrong, but aren't the 7600s 40Gbps per slot vs the GSR only being 10Gbps per slot? and doesn't that mean that there should (fairly soon) be a new version of the GSR coming that ups the slot width? The GSR is currently power and cooling cons

Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

.. Or the new ASR-9000 maybe? On 21-Jul-09, at 5:06 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: GSR is far better platform. Concur 100%. --- I'm probably wrong, but aren't the 7600s 40Gbps per slot vs the GSR only being 10Gbps per slot? and doesn't that mean that there should (fairly soon) be a new

Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

> > GSR is far better platform. > > Concur 100%. > --- > > I'm probably wrong, but aren't the 7600s 40Gbps per slot vs the GSR only > being 10Gbps per slot? and doesn't that mean that there should (fairly soon) > be a new version of the GSR coming that ups the slot width? It's called the CRS-1

RE: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

On Jul 20, 2009, at 5:26 PM, Neil J. McRae wrote: > GSR is far better platform. Concur 100%. --- I'm probably wrong, but aren't the 7600s 40Gbps per slot vs the GSR only being 10Gbps per slot? and doesn't that mean that there should (fairly soon) be a new version of the GSR coming that ups the

Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring

Munin http://munin.projects.linpro.no/ -> has a "api" to nagios and cacti: www.cacti.net (with add-on plugings, ie weathermap) cricket: http://cricket.sourceforge.net/ munin, cacti and cricket are more graphing than alerting (nagios) systems Kind regards, Ingo Flaschberger

Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring

Munin http://munin.projects.linpro.no/ Example: http://munin.ping.uio.no/ping.uio.no/dahl.ping.uio.no.html On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Jason Granat wrote: Spiceworks? http://www.spiceworks.com/ Sent while mobile On Jul 21, 2009, at 10:06, Matthew Huff wrote: I'm putting together a list of NM

Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring

Spiceworks? http://www.spiceworks.com/ Sent while mobile On Jul 21, 2009, at 10:06, Matthew Huff wrote: I'm putting together a list of NMS systems for system (hardware, cpu util%, memory util%) and application monitoring rather than network management for our environment. We are looking for

Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring

Argus http://argus.tcp4me.com Andrew Matthew Huff wrote: > I'm putting together a list of NMS systems for system (hardware, cpu util%, > memory util%) and application monitoring rather than network management for > our environment. We are looking for low cost / opensource solutions that have >

Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring

I'm putting together a list of NMS systems for system (hardware, cpu util%, memory util%) and application monitoring rather than network management for our environment. We are looking for low cost / opensource solutions that have agents and/or reliable agentless monitoring for windows, linux and

Re: What is good in modular routers these days?

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009, Petersen, Mark wrote: > FreeBSD provides support for 802.11q, bgpd, ospfd, pf(firewall) and > ALTQ(QOS) but since I haven't tested it I have no idea what kind of real > world performance you can get with all these features in use. > > This is one group trying to pony up at l

Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

We purchased one 7609 for deployment of transit BGP...it doesn't come close to the performance of a GSR w/PRP2's. Extremely high CPU useage on the 7609 with each BGP session... But on the 6509's...it does fine... Larry May Network Services n|Frame 888-223-8633

RE: What is good in modular routers these days?

FreeBSD has done work to optimize for 10gbps and they have a nice netperf cluster for testing http://www.freebsd.org/projects/netperf/cluster.html#resources >From http://www.freebsd.org/features.html - "10Gbps network optimization: With optimized device drivers from all major 10gbps network vendor

Re: Cisco 12000 series routers and IOS XR.

Neil, What release ox XR are you on? We had the 12000-SIP-501 in both 12ks but juet RMAed one of them and receive a 12000-SIP-601. The SPA-5X1Ge remain the same. What hardware are you running? If I may ask, what do you mean by "painful". Our experience with the 12000 (running ISO XR day one) has

Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

On Jul 21, 2009, at 5:08 PM, Manu Chao wrote: what about ASR 9000? No NetFlow, as least for now (this is important in edge applications, not so much in core); the hardware can do it, but it's yet to be implemented, AFAIK. -

Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.

what about ASR 9000? 2009/7/20 Alex H. Ryu > > About 3 months ago, Cisco Account Team was recommending AS14000 for our > company, and we rejected it. > Poor product development management! > > > Alex > > > Mohacsi Janos wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Alex H. Ryu wrote: > > > >> > >>