Re: Nanog Webcast Equipment

2009-06-30 Thread Charles Wyble
You can reply off-list if you wish. Would love to see replies and/or summary on list if possible. It's a somewhat complex problem, and there are many solutions out there. Having feedback on what was used and any feedback on it would be great!

Nanog Webcast Equipment

2009-06-30 Thread Israel Lopez-LISTS
Hello There, I was hoping someone from the NANOG team could comment on what equipment/software they use for the live meeting broadcasts. I am looking to do the same for another professional association and could use some pointers. You can reply off-list if you wish. -Israel

Re: Telephones for Noisy Data Centers

2009-06-30 Thread Robert E. Seastrom
>> Not 100% what you asked for, but the noise cancelling Jawbone >> bluetooth earpieces are great. >> > Cordless phone that does bluetooth + jawbone was the first thing that > popped into my head as well. Jawbone good. Jawbone + http://www.averysound.com/ outstanding. -r

draft-scholl-idr-advisory

2009-06-30 Thread Ron Bonica
Folks, At our Philadelphia meeting, the operator community displayed strong support for IETF draft-scholl-idr-advisory. This draft describes a BGP extension for passing free-form advisory messages between peers. The IDR WG is split regarding this draft, with enthusiasm waning. I am about to post

Re: less than a /24 & BGP tricks

2009-06-30 Thread Anton Kapela
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:54 AM, neal rauhauser wrote: >   I have a network with two upstreams that land in datacenters many miles > apart. The hardware involved is Cisco 7507s with RSP4s and VIP4-80. I've got > a curious problem which I hope others here have faced. [snip] >   I can terminate this

Re: less than a /24 & BGP tricks

2009-06-30 Thread Stephen Kratzer
Neal, If your providers are doing uRPF, and it is always the case that hosts using provider A's IPs must route through provider A, and hosts using provider B's IPs must route through provider B, then why not enforce this behavior in your routing tables rather than doing PBR? From your descript

Re: Reduced ISP uptime after BGP annoucement

2009-06-30 Thread Mike Lewinski
Dylan Ebner wrote: Does anyone know if it is the policy of Qwest (or ISPs) to have lower > uptime metrics for BGP customers or am I just experiancing lots of > downtime with an ISP that is known for having lots of problems? We do BGP to Qwest Internet and they've been as reliable as any oth

Reduced ISP uptime after BGP annoucement

2009-06-30 Thread Dylan Ebner
My company started partial BGP annoucements several months ago with our primary ISP, Qwest, and ever since BGP went active we have had more Qwest downtimes in 3 months than we had the previous 5 years. All of the downtimes have been within the qwest DIA group and not the deliver compenent group. D

less than a /24 & BGP tricks

2009-06-30 Thread neal rauhauser
I have a network with two upstreams that land in datacenters many miles apart. The hardware involved is Cisco 7507s with RSP4s and VIP4-80. I've got a curious problem which I hope others here have faced. A while ago we got a /28 from each provider and attached it to a dedicated fast ethernet