Okay, a small, offtopic question. (I figured you guys were a far more
reliable source than my local ${electronics_store} salesperson...)
Consider the following setup:
internet pipe -> wired network -> (wireless router) wireless network ->
computer1, computer2
Suppose the signal coming in on the p
Sean Donelan wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Jeroen Wunnink wrote:
1. Customers remember it more easily
2. Some ISP's also block 587 (hence 'SMTP ports' rather then 'SMTP
port' in my previous comment ;-)
Those same clueless ISPs will probably block 2525 someday too,
clueless expands to fill any
Most MTAs don't come preconfigured with port 587 either. It is amazing
how many people/organizations go with the "if it isn't broke, don't fix
it" mentality, even though it clearly needs to be revised and something
new needs to be done/supported. Email needs to be revamped on a larger
scale than ju
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Jeroen Wunnink wrote:
1. Customers remember it more easily
2. Some ISP's also block 587 (hence 'SMTP ports' rather then 'SMTP port' in
my previous comment ;-)
Those same clueless ISPs will probably block 2525 someday too, clueless
expands to fill any void. And using non-
AT&T is the major one that I know of that is still enforcing this
policy.
But they said they can unblock port 25 upon request. I am not sure
how easy
it is.
It's trivial. A web form. You get the link when you try to send mail
to port 25 anywhere else. At least with Yahoo/SBC dsl.
I got
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith .
Routing
I am the ISP, and we currently don't. However, I inherited this setup and have
been slowly fixing glaring holes (those are fairly well gone now) and not so
glaring one. When our new firewall gets in, I will be rolling in port 25
blocks on dynamic IP addresses. The static ips will be unfiltered.
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>
> Except for those ISPs who choose to intercept port 587 as well. This is
> a big problem with Rogers in Vancouver. They hijack port 587 connections
> through some sort of lame proxy that connects you to your intended host,
> but strips the AUTH field
"'My competitors are welcome to them. They won't earn anything on them
either."
Says Marco Visser, head of KPN's mobile services division, in response to
the press' inquiry whether their elimination of free phones for
pay-as-you-go would result in an outflow of customers
http://www.telegeography
Peter, to follow up on a few of your RF questions here:
The idea behind the Fresnel zones is that objects (larger than one
wavelength, a few centimeters at the frequencies we're dealing with
here) within the zones will reflect the incoming radio wave from the
transmitting radio. As seen by the
This report has been generated at Fri Jun 19 21:13:57 2009 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 11-Jun-09 -to- 18-Jun-09 (8 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS919883410 7.5% 842.5 -- KAZTELECOM-AS Kazakhtelecom
Corporate Sales Administration
> We just open port 2525 for customers from ISP's blocking official SMTP
> ports so they can use their dedicated servers/domain mailservers.
for personal use, i have a box that has sshd running on 443 and i tunnel
2525 through it. that worked even in the narita red rug when they were
at their blo
Justin Sharp wrote:
I didn't read through all of the replies to see if this was suggested,
apologies if it was.
http://www.solectek.com/products.php?prod=sw7k&page=feat
I implemented a PTP link at about 3 miles using these Solectek radios.
I get 40Mbps consistently with TCP traffic and ~100Mb
Yes..
1. Customers remember it more easily
2. Some ISP's also block 587 (hence 'SMTP ports' rather then 'SMTP port'
in my previous comment ;-)
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any errors.
On Jun 19, 2009, at 8:53, Jeroen Wunnink wrote:
We just open port 2525
Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any errors.
On Jun 19, 2009, at 8:53, Jeroen Wunnink wrote:
We just open port 2525 for customers from ISP's blocking official
SMTP ports so they can use their dedicated servers/domain mailservers.
Is there any reason you do not use port 587, SUBMIT?
--
We just open port 2525 for customers from ISP's blocking official SMTP
ports so they can use their dedicated servers/domain mailservers.
Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 16:14 -0400, Joe Provo wrote:
then you should be shifting your userbase to authenticated on the
SUBMIT
port
17 matches
Mail list logo
