On Jun 14, 2009, at 12:50 AM, bobby...@gmail.com wrote:
So what's the update. Has iran gone back?
I don't think so but I think that there are interruptions.
There is still BGP to at least some Iranian sites. The University of
Teheran, for example, has
*> 80.66.176.0/21 38.101.161.11
So what's the update. Has iran gone back?
-Original Message-
From: Eric Brunner-Williams
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 8:28 PM
To: Steve Pirk
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: [inquiry] Internet/cell in Teheran down?
I exchanged notes with someone in Tehran shortly after 6am EDT this
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/jun/13/cell-phone-service-down-after-disputed-iran-vote/
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Matthew
Moyle-Croft wrote:
> Maybe there's just a lot of congestion and it's not actually down?
>
> Happens here (Australia) on some mobile networks at large events - jus
Maybe there's just a lot of congestion and it's not actually down?
Happens here (Australia) on some mobile networks at large events - just
not enough bandwidth to go around and so you can't make calls and sms
are delayed. Given that there's a lot of protests etc and a lot of
people out and ab
I exchanged notes with someone in Tehran shortly after 6am EDT this
morning. NPR is at least partially incorrect.
Steve Pirk wrote:
Npr (All things considered) is reporting that cell phones and Internet
access in at least Teheran if not all of Iran is down. Reporters are
unable to connect out.
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Jared Mauch wrote:
> the menog lists require you to subscribe to
> view the archives. (So this could be redundant to content
> there.. i am not on their list).
No, this conversation is not also occuring on the MENOG list.
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Steve Pirk wrote:
> Npr (All things considered) is reporting that cell phones and Internet
> access in at least Teheran if not all of Iran is down. Reporters are
> unable to connect out.
>
> Anyone hear of anything?
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 08:47:57PM -0500, Reese wrote:
> Steve Pirk wrote:
>> Npr (All things considered) is reporting that cell phones and Internet
>> access in at least Teheran if not all of Iran is down. Reporters are
>> unable to connect out.
>>
>> Anyone hear of anything?
>
>
> Given the rec
Steve Pirk wrote:
Npr (All things considered) is reporting that cell phones and Internet
access in at least Teheran if not all of Iran is down. Reporters are
unable to connect out.
Anyone hear of anything?
Given the recent election and the unrest that is also being reported,
I'd bet that it
Npr (All things considered) is reporting that cell phones and Internet
access in at least Teheran if not all of Iran is down. Reporters are
unable to connect out.
Anyone hear of anything?
-steve
With resolution 2009-02-03-04, the ICANN Board asked the Root
Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC), the Security and
Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC), and the ICANN staff to study
the potential impact on the root zone stability that might arise
when IPv6 address records, IDN top level nam
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 03:32:42PM +0200, Weber, Markus wrote:
>
> So, is L2 encapsulation (e.g. Ethernet) considered as framing characters
> or not?
>
> Cisco does count them (looks like they also count the FCS), while
> Juniper does not (at least not on their routers) with above MIBs.
> So who
- Original Message -
From: "jamie rishaw"
To: "NANOG list"
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 6:41 PM
Subject: [OT] Micros~1 Sysinternals
[Off Topic] [Dont annoy the MLC by making this a thread]
[MLC: *waves hand, jedi style* This post is okay.]
All,
I dont know the politics behind
13 matches
Mail list logo
