Jack Bates wrote:
> Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> Well, unfortunately, the local PUC owns the fibre, and they have a
>> switch aggregating all of their fibre in a star pattern. They then trunk
>> the VLANs to me across two redundant pair. I'm in the process of
>> persuading them to allow me to put my ow
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Well, unfortunately, the local PUC owns the fibre, and they have a
switch aggregating all of their fibre in a star pattern. They then trunk
the VLANs to me across two redundant pair. I'm in the process of
persuading them to allow me to put my own gear in their location so I
Danny McPherson wrote:
>
> On May 22, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>>>
>>> neighbor xxx.xx.xx.x timers 30 60
>>>
>>> Make sure that this is communicated to your peer as well so that
>>> their timer setting are reflected the same.
>>
>> Thankfully at this point, we manage all CPE of any
> If you want to converge a little fast than BGP holdtimes here
> and the fiber link is directly between the routers, you might
> look at something akin to Cisco's "bgp fast-external-fallover",
> which immediately resets the session if the link layer is
> reset or lost.
>
Also things to consider:
On May 22, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
neighbor xxx.xx.xx.x timers 30 60
Make sure that this is communicated to your peer as well so that
their timer setting are reflected the same.
Thankfully at this point, we manage all CPE of any clients who peer
with
us, and so far, the
Yes, thats what i had meant !
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Christopher Morrow <
morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Glen Kent wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It is well known in the community that AH is NAT unfriendly while ESP
> cannot
> > be filtered, and most firewa
Zaid Ali wrote:
> From experience I found that you need to keep all the timers in sync with all
> your peers. Something like this for every peer in your bgp config.
>
> neighbor xxx.xx.xx.x timers 30 60
>
> Make sure that this is communicated to your peer as well so that their timer
> setting a
>From experience I found that you need to keep all the timers in sync with all
>your peers. Something like this for every peer in your bgp config.
neighbor xxx.xx.xx.x timers 30 60
Make sure that this is communicated to your peer as well so that their timer
setting are reflected the same.
Zaid
Hi all,
I've got numerous single-site 100Mb fibre clients who have backup SDSL
links to my PoP. The two services terminate on separate
distribution/access routers.
The CPE that peers to my fibre router sets a community, and my end sets
the pref to 150 based on it. The CPE also sets a higher pref
On May 22, 2009, at 6:20 AM, Shivlu Jain wrote:
I have seen a weird behaviour in case of pseudo wire termination, it
keeps
on polling the destination ip even if the interface mapped to pseudo
wire is
down.
Is it the normal behaviour?
Shivula,
You probably need to address your query to eit
I can only imagine that costs are indeed affected. Companies
requesting combatant ship escorts are required to reimburse the
escorting nation.
--
Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net
Black Lotus Communications of The IRC Company, Inc.
Look for us
FYI, I thought this was interesting reading for the workaholics among us as
we head into the holiday weekend in the United States. I'd also like to
follow it with an (hopefully) interesting question.
http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090520_bandwidth_buyers_price_differences_global_market/
The cos
I must have forgotten to not my location. I am in Western Massachusetts.
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> I suspect that you might have more luck if you mentioned where you are, how
> far you would be willing to drive to pick one up and how long you would need
> to use i
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith .
Routing
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Glen Kent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is well known in the community that AH is NAT unfriendly while ESP cannot
> be filtered, and most firewalls would not let such packets pass. I am NOT
'the content of the esp packet can't be filtered in transit' I think
you mean... rig
Hi,
It is well known in the community that AH is NAT unfriendly while ESP cannot
be filtered, and most firewalls would not let such packets pass. I am NOT
interested in encrypting the data, but i do want origination authentication
(Integrity Protection). Do folks in such cases use AH or ESP-NULL,
I suspect that you might have more luck if you mentioned where you
are, how far you would be willing to drive to pick one up and how long
you would need to use it for...
For example, I could probably loan you an old 7200 that would fit the
bill, but I'm in VA which probably wouldn't work ou
Once upon a time, Bobby Kuzma said:
> Does anybody have any information on this? I've had 4 customers on Qwest for
> Internet connectivity in Florida drop off the net within a few minutes of
> each other.
I'm have Qwest via Atlanta and I'm not seeing any issues.
--
Chris Adams
Systems and Net
Does anybody have any information on this? I've had 4 customers on Qwest for
Internet connectivity in Florida drop off the net within a few minutes of each
other.
Thanks,
Bobby Kuzma, CISSP
VP, Professional Services
ElectroNerdz, Inc.
Office: 863-709-0204x1911
Fax: 863-709-0506
I have an urgent need for a router to replace the one that crocked last
night. If you have a router to sell or lend please contact me off list
It could be the following or equivalent of a Cisco 7000 with the following
interfaces:
1x T3 clear channel (like a PA-T3)
1x FastEthernet
(Alternatively
I have seen a weird behaviour in case of pseudo wire termination, it keeps
on polling the destination ip even if the interface mapped to pseudo wire is
down.
Is it the normal behaviour?
--
Thanks & Regards
shivlu jain
http://shivlu.blogspot.com/
This report has been generated at Fri May 22 21:21:01 2009 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 19-Apr-09 -to- 20-May-09 (32 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS3130 135278 2.3% 526.4 -- RGNET-3130 RGnet/PSGnet
2 - AS638954635 0.9%
on issues like this :
[1] JFGI
-> if fail :
[2] man smartnet
-> if fail :
[3] go back to studying to get that A+ and consider perhaps a yob in redmond
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Yes, i can get sample of configuration via Google search.
>>
Hi!
Yes, i can get sample of configuration via Google search.
but i am looking for best practices and from experience people.
Then post your suggested config and ask for comments.
...on a suitable list, dedicated to Cisco gear..
Sorry, yes. :-) Plenty of Cisco lists there to answer 'ques
Subject: Re: Local Peering and Transit - BGP multihoming Date: Fri, May 22,
2009 at 10:55:14AM +0200 Quoting Raymond Dijkxhoorn (raym...@prolocation.net):
> Hi!
>
>> Yes, i can get sample of configuration via Google search.
>> but i am looking for best practices and from experience people.
>
> The
Hi!
Yes, i can get sample of configuration via Google search.
but i am looking for best practices and from experience people.
Then post your suggested config and ask for comments.
Bye,
Raymond.
27 matches
Mail list logo
