Re: two interfaces one subnet

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Chris Meidinger wrote: > Just to restate here, for people who have been responding both publicly and > privately: > > I know that *I* can make it work, and I know that *you* can make it work. > But I also know that it's not likely to stay working. You might like

Multilink PPPoE Scalability Issue

Please help :) The network topology is: ADSL CPE (Cisco 2800) +===[PPPoE]===+ LAC (Telco's equipment) +===[L2TP]===+ LNS (Cisco 7513) The setup is for aggregating multiple PPPoE DSL lines with PPP. Using the Cisco 7513 as the LNS, the setup works up to 15 MLPPP bundles and with Cisco 72

Re: two interfaces one subnet

Completely off topic but, does this subject make anyone else immediately think of 2girls1cup? I blame the internets for my making this correlation... --Original Message-- From: Martin Hannigan To: Patrick W. Gilmore Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: two interfaces one subnet Sent: May 12, 2009

Re: two interfaces one subnet

On 12.05.2009, at 19:37, Curtis Maurand wrote: Try this: http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net:Bridge Wow. It's really hard to convince people that you're not trying to solve a problem today but to avoid one tomorrow. Stil, I want to thank everyone that responded - both publicly and pr

Re: two interfaces one subnet

Try this: http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net:Bridge --Curtis Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: On May 11, 2009, at 5:40 PM, Ben Scott wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Hector Herrera wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:22 PM, David Devereaux-Weber wrote: ... both> interfaces are on the same

Re: two interfaces one subnet

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > On May 11, 2009, at 11:43 PM, Ben Scott wrote: > >> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore >> wrote: >> > > Do you even read your own posts? Specifically: >>> >>> On May 11, 2009, at 5:40 PM, Ben Scott wrote: >>> >>> E

Re: two interfaces one subnet

On May 11, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Duane Waddle wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: IIRC, you can turn the feature off WHEN it makes an issue. Fixed that for you. S550 attached to a 6509, Dell blade in a blade chassis with Power connect switches cross-connected

Re: Checking bogon status of new address space

James Hess writes: >> 29/256 = 11% of the available address space.  My argument is, if >> someone is scanning you from random source addresses blocking 10% >> of the scan traffic is reaching a point of very little return for >> the effort of updating the address lists, and as we all know it is >

Re: 10-GigE for servers

Cisco is trying to push another kind of adapter called CNA, integrating Ethernet and FCoE for use in a "loss less" network. It uses several proprietary specifications. More information can be obtained here: http://www.qlogic.com/Products/Datanetworking_products_CNA_QLE8042.aspx http://www.qlogic.

Re: two interfaces one subnet

David Devereaux-Weber wrote: > > I work with iHDTV , a project that sends uncompressed high > definition television (1.5 Gbps) as UDP over two 1 Gbps interfaces. If both > interfaces are on the same subnet, the OS sees the same router (gateway) > address on both interfaces, and