Re: iBGP Scaling

2009-03-28 Thread isabel dias
Dave, Your netblock might be a standard /19 or just a modest /30 :-) or you are just deploying IPv6 and therefore applied for one of the most recent RIPE assigments. Do you have different AS private/public numbers running on your network? filtering IGP routes part pf the OSPF design would

Re: iBGP Scaling

2009-03-28 Thread Charles Gucker
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 1:13 PM, tt tt wrote: > > Hi List, > > We are looking to move our non infrastructure routes into iBGP to help with > our IGP scalability (OSPF).  We already run full BGP tables on our core where > we connect to multiple upstream and downstream customers.  Most of our > a

[NANOG-announce] VERP now active on all NANOG mailing lists

2009-03-28 Thread kris foster
Hi everyone All NANOG mailing lists were updated to use VERP (variable envelope return paths) at the beginning of the week. This will aid in bounce detection and help identify the subscriber. A more detailed description of VERP can be found here: http://wiki.list.org/display/DOC/So+what+is+

iBGP Scaling

2009-03-28 Thread tt tt
Hi List, We are looking to move our non infrastructure routes into iBGP to help with our IGP scalability (OSPF). We already run full BGP tables on our core where we connect to multiple upstream and downstream customers. Most of our aggregation and edge routers cannot hold full tables and it'

Re: Google Over IPV6

2009-03-28 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Athanasios Douitsis wrote: > Heard that they are somewhat picky about who they -enable. Our campus > has had native IPv6 everywhere and upwards all the way to Geant for many > years. We are thinking of applying in the hopes that it will boost IPv6 > usage. Did you have any trouble getting th

Re: REVERSE DNS Practices.

2009-03-28 Thread William Pitcock
On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 03:12 -0400, Luke S Crawford wrote: > bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com writes: > > or - the more modern approach is to let the node (w/ proper authorization) > > do a secure dynamic update of the revserse map - so the forward and reverse > > delegations match. ... a -VERY- use

Re: REVERSE DNS Practices.

2009-03-28 Thread Luke S Crawford
bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com writes: > or - the more modern approach is to let the node (w/ proper authorization) > do a secure dynamic update of the revserse map - so the forward and reverse > delegations match. ... a -VERY- useful technique. I have a question. Is this an abuse problem? som