A finely tuned killfile that remains mostly static once defined works
wonders across all threads and fairly well.
Best,
Marty
On 3/15/09, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> On Mar 15, 2009, at 1:20 AM, Charles Wyble wrote:
>
>> Can we please get this thread closed or something?
>>
>
> Maybe we shoul
On 2009-03-15, Mike Lyon wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I am wondering what folks are recommending/using these days for Linux SSL
> proxies? I need to build a linux box that basically acts as an SSL offloader
> would (like a BigIP / Cisco ACE / Netscaler would do). Listen on port 443,
> decrypt the SSL and t
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Maybe we should start the nanog-law mailing list.
Maybe we should stick to the operational "Subject" at hand: log retention?
Is there any disagreement that everybody SHOULD keep dynamic assignment logs
for at least 36 hours as a Best Current Practice?
Is there any evi
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009, Michael K. Smith wrote:
> We use Apache with mod_security and mod_proxy to do this, although the
> application is more as an application layer firewall than an SSL offloader.
> It works well for lower traffic applications; I haven't tested it under the
> loads that are advert
Hello Mike:
On 3/14/09 9:56 PM, "Mike Lyon" wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I am wondering what folks are recommending/using these days for Linux SSL
> proxies? I need to build a linux box that basically acts as an SSL offloader
> would (like a BigIP / Cisco ACE / Netscaler would do). Listen on port 443,
On Mar 15, 2009, at 1:20 AM, Charles Wyble wrote:
Can we please get this thread closed or something?
Maybe we should start the nanog-law mailing list.
Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 23:17, Joe Greco wrote:
"Looking around" Rockefeller Center generally isn't a crime.
"Look
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Andy Bierlair wrote:
Im trying to run netflow on one of our Cisco core routers (SUP720-3BXL),
but I think I am hitting some limitations because of this:
%EARL_NETFLOW-SP-4-TCAM_THRLD: Netflow TCAM threshold exceeded, TCAM
Utilization [99%]
TCAM Utilization :
On 15/03/2009 01:55, Andy Bierlair wrote:
I’m trying to run netflow on one of our Cisco core routers (SUP720-3BXL),
but I think I am hitting some limitations because of this:
Sounds about right for the amount of traffic you're pushing through the
box. The SUP720 is a very poor netflow platfor
Have a look at
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps700/products_tech_note09186a00801b42bf.shtml#prob1a
// Olof
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Andy Bierlair wrote:
> yes ip cef, this is enabled:
>
> IP fast switching is enabled
> IP fast switching on the same interface is disab
9 matches
Mail list logo
