Hi
try netdot (https://netdot.uoregon.edu/trac/)
It's a pretty good stuff ,but not easy to setup
Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> Howdy.
>
> Had a customer come to me this morning who wanted to create a
> document for their switching infrastructure and thought I would
> bounce it off the rest of the worl
Hi Devang
We are using the vrf nat where the customer demands the firewall services.
For implementing this we are advertising a default route and vrf nat is used
per VPN basics.This is the rate services in case of whole sale.
Actual implementation; we are creating a INTERNET VRF which is having a
Is there anyone clueful in this list from Road Runner(Time Warner
Cable) that can explain what's going on with their DNS servers - just
contacted their tech support and heard their DNS servers have been
under attack over the last 3 days..
thanks,
--Ricardo
On Feb 25, 2009, at 8:14 AM, Ray Corbin wrote:
It depends on your environment. I've seen where it is helpful and
where it is overwhelming. If you are a smaller company and want to
know why you keep getting blocked then those should help. If you are
a larger company and get a several hundred
On Feb 26, 2009, at 5:08 PM, J.D. Falk wrote:
Blocking an entire site just because one John Doe user clicked a
button
they don't even understand just does not make sense.
You're right -- but Yahoo! has a sufficiently large userbase that
they can count multiple complaints before blocking an
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 6:45 AM, J.D. Falk
wrote:
> Many recipients of complaint feedback actually /want/ to receive every
> complaint, because -- like John Levine -- they treat those complaints as
> unsubscribe requests.
That's ONE use case. But we are not senders, and we do use a feedback
loop
Barry Shein wrote:
I suggested that probably 99% of the false positives I see could be
avoided by just waiting until there are two or more complaints from
the same source before firing it back as spam.
I've developed systems for ISPs to handle inbound complaints from AOL &
such, and that's ex
very old news.
their filter restrictions have some very absurd rules
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Micheal Patterson <
mich...@spmedicalgroup.com> wrote:
> This may be old news, but I've not been in the list for quite some time. At
> any rate, is anyone else having issues with Yahoo blocking
Brian Keefer wrote:
The other options is to stuff all the spam messages in a folder and
expose them to the user, taking up a huge amount of storage space for
something the vast majority of users are never going to look at any way.
Which is, in fact, what Yahoo! does by default. Users have the
Hello,
Have one question about VRF aware NAT for internet access! If we will enable
the VRF aware NAT on local PE to have an internet access via central
Internet PE then we will not have connectivity to any other VPN site as all
local CE prefixes will be translated to the loopback IP address of th
Blake Pfankuch wrote:
Howdy.
Had a customer come to me this morning who wanted to create a document for their
switching infrastructure and thought I would bounce it off the rest of the world on how
you usually do this. Typically I use a spreadsheet with outlines to define the
"switch" and th
On Feb 26, 2009, at 2:00 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
You're that confident people know the difference between a real
communication from a party they conversed with before and a phish
designed to look like the same thing?
What I worry about is when software is used to scrape lists such as
Man.. I'd love to have this for Netgear switches! :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Bielawa, Daniel W. (NS) [mailto:dwbiel...@liberty.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 2:07 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Documentation of switch maps
>
> Hello,
>
> We use switchmap h
$0.02 within
> -Original Message-
> From: Barry Shein [mailto:b...@world.std.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 10:29 PM
> To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Yahoo and their mail filters..
>
>
> On February 26, 2009 at 06:55 ops.li...@gmail.com (Sures
Dear Blake,
Had a customer come to me this morning who wanted to create a document
for their switching infrastructure and thought I would bounce it off the
rest of the world on how you usually do this. Typically I use a
spreadsheet with outlines to define the "switch" and then outlines for
t
Hello,
We use switchmap here for tracking port utilization, days inactive, and
devices connected. It uses SNMP to determine the information.
http://switchmap.sourceforge.net/
Thank You
Daniel Bielawa
Network Engineer
Liberty University Information Services
-Original Message-
F
Howdy.
Had a customer come to me this morning who wanted to create a document for
their switching infrastructure and thought I would bounce it off the rest of
the world on how you usually do this. Typically I use a spreadsheet with
outlines to define the "switch" and then outlines for the port
You're that confident people know the difference between a real communication
from a party they conversed with before and a phish designed to look like the
same thing?
If it's a bank, probably not. If it's a random online store, there's
about a 99.9% chance it's actual junk mail and .01% that
On Feb 26, 2009, at 8:28 AM, John R. Levine wrote:
This also pre-dates organized crime becoming heavily involved, and
pre-dates the obsession with browser exploits. Back then a lot of
spam was sent by semi-legitimate marketers from the US. These days
all the bad guys are out to get you to
On Feb 26, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:28 PM, John R. Levine
wrote:
This also pre-dates organized crime becoming heavily involved, and
pre-dates the obsession with browser exploits. Back then a lot of
spam was
sent by semi-legitimate marketers
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:28 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
> This also pre-dates organized crime becoming heavily involved, and
>> pre-dates the obsession with browser exploits. Back then a lot of spam was
>> sent by semi-legitimate marketers from the US. These days all the bad guys
>> are out to g
on Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 02:17:14PM -0500, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:44:13 PST, JC Dill said:
>
> > Universities are often major sources of spam. Spam is sent directly
> > from virus-infected student computers,
>
> Got any numbers to back up the claim that virus-in
This also pre-dates organized crime becoming heavily involved, and pre-dates
the obsession with browser exploits. Back then a lot of spam was sent by
semi-legitimate marketers from the US. These days all the bad guys are out
to get you to click on a single link.
Right. Back in the 90s spamm
If the router is cisco , you also wanna check the code and see if there
are any known bugs on the code track. We had a simmiliar issu with an
IOS and BGP.
But , I do agree with Darel , as well.
Mo Durrani
>TDS Telecom
>IP Network Engineering
>608-664-5698
mo.durr...@tdstelecom
On Feb 26, 2009, at 6:59 AM, John Levine wrote:
Nor should they. Anyone who actually researches this stuff knows
that
the vast majority of "unsub" links simply confirm you as a live
target
who will click on random links sent to them through e-mail.
That's the conventional wisdom, not con
>Nor should they. Anyone who actually researches this stuff knows that
>the vast majority of "unsub" links simply confirm you as a live target
>who will click on random links sent to them through e-mail.
That's the conventional wisdom, not confirmed by research. The FTC
tried it in 2002 a
>I suggested that probably 99% of the false positives I see could be
>avoided by just waiting until there are two or more complaints from
>the same source before firing it back as spam.
Perhaps, but different people have different heuristics. There's
nothing keeping you from writing your own de-d
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
> Mailman's bounce parser is clever enough that there's no manualarity.
>
> AOL's ARF redaction also causes problems identifying problem .forwarders.
> I don't understand what they are trying to defend against.
If you want to enable verp with mai
AOL's ARF redaction also causes problems identifying problem .forwarders.
I don't understand what they are trying to defend against.
Oh, I went around with them a few times and finally got a reasonable
explanation. They're concerned about disclosing the recipient of a
message to someone who d
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, John R. Levine wrote:
>
> Sounds like it might be time to reconsider your mailing list config. A decade
> ago, bandwidth was really expensive and it made sense to try to load up lots
> of recipients per delivery. These days it's essentially free, and any saving
> in bandwidth
AOL sends its spam button feedback in industry standard ARF format. It
took me about 20 minutes to write a perl script that picks out the
relevant bits from AOL and Hotmail feedback messages and sends unsub
commands to my list manager.
Yes, but you're using qmail and ezmlm which send separate co
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, John Levine wrote:
>
> AOL sends its spam button feedback in industry standard ARF format. It
> took me about 20 minutes to write a perl script that picks out the
> relevant bits from AOL and Hotmail feedback messages and sends unsub
> commands to my list manager.
Yes, but you
Using an external CSU? Power cycle it.
Using Frame Relay? Have provider check card in Frame switch, if the port reads
65535 the buffers are full. Have the provider reset the card (shared memory
cards are bad).
Without configuration info or other supporting info it will be difficult to
tell wh
> -Original Message-
> From: Shivlu Jain [mailto:shivlu.j...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 4:05 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Problem With E1
>
> Since morning I am facing a issue in which one of E1 is configured under
> OSPF. OSPF neighborship is up but not able t
This discussion is probably *much* more appropriate on the mailop list.
(It's been mentioned there and on other MTA/spam-related lists, as
apparently whatever Yahoo's doing is having widespread impact.)
---Rsk
Since morning I am facing a issue in which one of E1 is configured under
OSPF. OSPF neighborship is up but not able to send and receive the data. The
configuration is plain vanila. Why it is happening so; I donot know?
--
Thanks & Regards
shivlu jain
http://shivlu.blogspot.com/
09312010137
36 matches
Mail list logo
